Talk:Main Page

Archives: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5 6 - 7 - 8 - 9 - 10 11 - 12 - 13 - 14 - 15 16 - 17 - 18 - 19

Note: This page is the best place to ask questions and propose projects. To get a better response from the Halopedian community, please see the Community forums instead. For questions and answers regarding the Halo universe, see our "Ask Us Anything" page.

Jiralhanae Civil War

Should there be a page on the armed conflict between the Jiralhanae that took place before they joined the Covenant?--光环的家伙 (H1234-NET) 14:16, 8 October 2011 (EDT)

I'm not sure; virtually all we know about this war is that the Jiralhanae were heavily scarred, technology-wise. It probably wasn't a civil war, either - the species was culturally divided into clan-based systems, even into their service under the Covenant.-- Forerunner 15:49, 8 October 2011 (EDT)

In Stomping on the Heels of a Fuss, the Jiralhanae continuously refer to it as "the great civil war" (p62 and 63). "Civil war" in this context may have a broader meaning, referring to a civil war amongst their entire species or civilization, as opposed to one within a single nation. Within the Covenant, species and culture are largely synonymous, as evidenced by the fact the names of Covenant species are capitalized without exception, while "human" isn't. Despite the fact the Jiralhanae tribes have differences, it's rather easy to find enough unifying similarities to group them as a single civilization. In addition, it's not entirely impossible the Jiralhanae had a united government of some kind before the war and the current tribal system is a result of regression caused by the war, much like most post-apocalyptic fiction deals with the collapse of human civilization and the re-emergence of smaller, tribal societies.--Jugus (Talk | Contribs) 08:44, 20 October 2011 (EDT)

Considering their entire species was until recently united together in an empire. I suppose you could consider it like the 1948 war between Israel and Palestine - the two were one nation that plunged into a civil war, with Israel seceeding. The US civil war was between the United States and the territories that had recently seceeded from them. So, a civil war isn't just defined by "one nation goes to war with itself"; it can include warfare with territory recently seceeded from them.-- Forerunner 14:40, 20 October 2011 (EDT)

Landing page update 2011

So, what do you think? :) — subtank 15:15, 18 October 2011 (EDT)

A Bit of reformatting is necassary, but its definitely better than the clusterf*ck that was the old page. User:Infernal-Blaze

Mind taking a screenshot? :) — subtank 15:58, 18 October 2011 (EDT)

Thanks for using the logo I made. It's really cool to see it on the front page!--Soul reaper 21:27, 18 October 2011 (EDT)

Well I like it. Now we just need that background... pestilence Phil, pestilence! 21:33, 18 October 2011 (EDT)

I kinda miss the pictures. Also the real world button isn't very good.--Ben Traeger is King 22:21, 18 October 2011 (EDT)

What if we changed the Real World button to an image of Mister Chief? :D pestilence Phil, pestilence!

Create a good image and we'll see. :) — subtank 09:47, 19 October 2011 (EDT)

Usage of the New Content template

I've noticed that people often tend to remove the New Content template the moment the "new content" comes out, without updating the page with the said new content. To me, this seems counterproductive; it negates the whole purpose of the template, which is to point out the page needs to be updated. It seems more appropriate to remove the template only after the content's some months old or already updated; otherwise there isn't much point to it in the first place. We could immediately replace it with Template:Outofdate, but that doesn't make much sense either, given the content is still very new. I think the New Content template should be kept in articles for a certain amount of time, perhaps two months, after which it would be replaced by the out of date template if the content hasn't been updated by that point. --Jugus (Talk | Contribs) 13:43, 26 October 2011 (EDT)

I agree, 2 months seems like a fair amount of time. File:Colonel Grade One.pngCol. Snipes450File:Colonel Grade One.png 14:09, 26 October 2011 (EDT)

Possible Sangheili Civil War article

Throughout Halo: Glasslands, there are multiple instances of a split between the Sangheili race, namely those loyal to the Arbiter and those loyal to the Servants of Abiding Truth. Near the end of the book the pilot escorting Phillips notes there has been armed conflict between the keeps on Sanghelios, does anyone else think there should be at least a brief article on this? File:Colonel Grade One.pngCol. Snipes450File:Colonel Grade One.png 12:16, 31 October 2011 (EDT)

Up to date

I'm just curious how up to date we are on Glasslands info. I don't have the book yet and am unwilling to read spoilers, so I can't really check. pestilence Phil, pestilence! 21:14, 4 November 2011 (EDT)

Not at all. I've just finished reading the 10000 unread Halopedia emails that I wouldn't read before I finished the book, and we're not up to date AT ALL. Vegerot goes RAWR! File:Icon-Vegito2.gif Vegerot (talk) 21:29, 5 November 2011 (EDT)!