Halopedia talk:Featured/Article/Nomination: Difference between revisions

From Halopedia, the Halo wiki

No edit summary
Line 91: Line 91:
*{{Oppose}} - Does not exceed the minumum size and does not have many images in the actual article.--[[User talk:The Reborn Qual 'Fulsamee|The Reborn Qual 'Fulsamee]] 12:52, 6 April 2011 (EDT)
*{{Oppose}} - Does not exceed the minumum size and does not have many images in the actual article.--[[User talk:The Reborn Qual 'Fulsamee|The Reborn Qual 'Fulsamee]] 12:52, 6 April 2011 (EDT)
*{{Oppose}} - The article is definitely interesting enough to have potential for the title, but its current state doesn't warrant that. - [[File:Major.png|20px]] [[User:Nicmavr|<span style="color:DarkGoldenrod; font-weight:bold; font-family:Arial">Nìcmávr</span>]] <sup><span style="color:DarkGoldenrod">(</span>[[User Talk:Nicmavr|<span style="color:DarkGoldenrod; font-weight:bold">Tálk</span>]]<span style="color:DarkGoldenrod">)</span></sup> 14:56, 6 April 2011 (EDT)
*{{Oppose}} - The article is definitely interesting enough to have potential for the title, but its current state doesn't warrant that. - [[File:Major.png|20px]] [[User:Nicmavr|<span style="color:DarkGoldenrod; font-weight:bold; font-family:Arial">Nìcmávr</span>]] <sup><span style="color:DarkGoldenrod">(</span>[[User Talk:Nicmavr|<span style="color:DarkGoldenrod; font-weight:bold">Tálk</span>]]<span style="color:DarkGoldenrod">)</span></sup> 14:56, 6 April 2011 (EDT)
*{{Oppose}} - Do not feel it meets the standards for FA. - [[User:ShadowBroker44|<span style="background:black; font-family:Courier New;font-size:10pt;color:white;">'''S.B.44'''</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:ShadowBroker44|<span style="color:black;">[Talk]</span></sup>]] 16:24, 2 August 2011 (EDT)


==[[Forerunner]] (Won)==
==[[Forerunner]] (Won)==

Revision as of 16:24, August 2, 2011

Preston Jeremiah Cole

An excellent article, excellently written with solid sourcing and notes per the new sourcing guidelines. Evolutions has provided a lot of new information for him and I think the article warrants some time as a featured article. - S.B.44 [Talk] 01:12, February 28, 2010 (UTC)

Support (Won)

  1. Support.svg Support - per nomination - S.B.44 [Talk] 01:12, February 28, 2010 (UTC)
  2. Support.svg Support - I was just thinking this the other day. It's very well written, very detailed and well sourced. It's featured article material in my book. - File:Black Mesa.jpg Halo-343 (Talk) (Contribs) (Edits) 01:16, February 28, 2010 (UTC)
  3. Support.svg Support - Hell yeah! The article is very well witten, and we have not had a new fetured article in almost 2 years I think. --"We are not backing down now. Besides, I dont like losing, remember?" User: Yugiohtipman34 01:19, February 28, 2010 (UTC)
  4. Support.svg Support - And it's done. User:CommanderTony/Sig
sweet. - S.B.44 [Talk] 01:40, February 28, 2010 (UTC)

Neutral

  1. Halopedia Vote Symbol Neutral.svg Neutral Being a picky bastard right now; sources should be well cited; that includes page numbers and what chapters they were mentioned/appeared in and formatted properly. Some of the content looks legit but potentially well made-up. Citations would clear things up. And yes, I'm just voicing my opinion on how to further improve the article and am not going to do it right now.(7alk) 01:38, February 28, 2010 (UTC)

Oppose

Catherine Elizabeth Halsey (Won)

Dr. Halsey is an integral part of the Halo canon. From her development of the MJOLNIR armor system, to the augmentations performed on the Spartan-II's , and even the creation of Cortana, Halsey has indirectly saved humanity many times. She has not been directly mentioned in any of the games but it is clear that she is one of the most important characters in halo universe and warrants featured article status. In addition to this it is a well written article, and fits all of CommanderTony's new criteria for featured articles. - S.B.44 [T] 03:47, March 17, 2010 (UTC)

Support

  1. Support.svg Support - Per nomination, - S.B.44 [T] 03:47, March 17, 2010 (UTC)
  2. Support.svg Support It's a well written, and sourced, article. There's a few places, currently, where inline citations are scarce (working on that), but those are far and few between. If FA's are to be a regular event this would be a good one to move on to. -- Lord Hyren 04:29, March 25, 2010 (UTC)
  3. Support.svg Support - What ShadowBroker said. :P --"Why am I here and what the hell are you?"The guy who hates his username. 05:31, March 25, 2010 (UTC)
  4. Support.svg Support - And it's done. User:CommanderTony/Sig

Neutral

Oppose

New Mombasa (Won)

New Mombasa has had a flood of new information upon the release of ODST, and it has been maintained to a high standard since then. It is well written, laid out accordingly, fully sourced, has a fine amount of images in the main article, and a sizable gallery. Being such an integral part of the series, being a main setting in Halo 2 and Halo 3: ODST, its article does it justice. It fits all of CT's new Featured Article criteria. - File:Black Mesa.jpg Halo-343 (Talk) (Contribs) (Edits) 20:17, April 14, 2010 (UTC)

Support

  1. Support.svg Support - As per above suggestion. - File:Black Mesa.jpg Halo-343 (Talk) (Contribs) (Edits) 20:17, April 14, 2010 (UTC)
  2. Support.svg Support - It's definitely a good choice. --Jugus (Talk | Contribs) 20:57, April 14, 2010 (UTC)
  3. Support.svg Support -- 5əb'7aŋk(7alk) 19:36, April 26, 2010 (UTC)
  4. Support.svg Support - - File:Major.png Nìcmávr (Tálk) 19:10, May 2, 2010 (UTC)
  5. Support.svg Support -- Lord Hyren 19:24, May 2, 2010 (UTC)
  6. Support.svg Support - File:Commander Silver Leaf.PNG Kougermasters (Talk) (Contribs) (Edits) 19:54, May 2, 2010 (UTC)

Neutral

Oppose

Thel 'Vadam

In addition to being a well written-well sourced article, the Arbiter is the second most important character in the Halo series. He heavily influences the entire Halo Universe and stands out as an example of what a Sangheili should be. - User:ShadowBroker44/sig 00:34, September 8, 2010 (UTC)

Support

  1. Support.svg Support - per nomination - User:ShadowBroker44/sig 00:34, September 8, 2010 (UTC)
  2. Support.svg Support - I'm surprised this article was never featured yet. I took a good look at it and not much cleanup is needed. Citations seemed to have been added and taken cared of too. --Template:UF Signature
  3. Support.svg Support - Well written, well cited, well organized, good images, good quotes, no 2nd person handwriting... This article is a great example for writing a character article! S331 Bubbleshieldhud.svg (TalkContributions) 07:44, 19 April 2011 (EDT)
  4. Support.svg Support - Per nomination. This is an extremely important figure in the Halo universe and should be recognised. User:CurtisRustiGunn

#Support.svg Support - Thel 'Vadam is to important of a charactor to leave out. He was a very large part of the original Halo trilogy, in Halo 2, Halo 3, and even behind the scenes in Halo 1. Of course Thel 'Vadam should be a featured article!!! 'If only it were so easy'. - File:Halo-wars-5-th.jpg CovenantSeparatist 18:29, 28 July 2011 (EDT)

Neutral

  1. Halopedia Vote Symbol Neutral.svg Neutral The article is well cited until material from Halo 2 is being covered, and the citations all but disappear in the sections following. It wouldn't take much work to add them, and if added I'll change my vote, but for now I must remain neutral. I won't say the article shouldn't be featured, but it just isn't there yet for me. -- Lord Hyren 04:43, September 8, 2010 (UTC)

Oppose

SPARTAN-B312 (Won)

For an article about a character that technically has no gender, SPARTAN-B312 is both surprisingly well written and well constructed. Noble Six would be an excellent featured article in light of the recent release of Halo: Reach. The article is sourced well, and exceeds the minimum size of a featured article. - File:Black Mesa.jpg Halo-343 (Talk) 16:41, 5 November 2010 (EDT)

Support

Neutral

Oppose

Slipstream space (Won)

An excellent article, written with solid sourcing and notes.- 5əb'7aŋk(7alk) 19:08, 2 January 2011 (EST)

Support

Neutral

Oppose

Carter-A259

This article is extremely well written and raises the bar for proper citation of sources which assured accurate information.--Sierra259 10:59, 30 March 2011 (EDT)

Support

  • Support.svg Support - As per above proposal.--Sierra259 11:11, 30 March 2011 (EDT)

Neutral

  • Halopedia Vote Symbol Neutral.svg Neutral - While it is a well written, well sourced article, it just doesn't seem to be long enough to be designated a featured article, and indeed does not exceed the minimum size of 15,000 bytes. - File:Black Mesa.jpg Halo-343 (Talk) 11:59, 1 April 2011 (EDT)
  • Halopedia Vote Symbol Neutral.svg Neutral — In addition to what H343 stated above, there's definitely enough content in Halo: Reach to expand his biography. User:CommanderTony/Sig
  • Halopedia Vote Symbol Neutral.svg Neutral - Its not far from a featured article, but still needs some improvements to reach that standards. As said above, "Biography" is good but it can be expanded a lot. The equipment section should be renamed to "Appearance" that will include his weaponry and armor as well. Some information in trivia could be added to an "Age" section, or to his "Childhood" section. "Traits and Personality" can include a "Relationships" section, where Carter's relationships with the rest of the team will be analyzed further. ShadowDancer |contribs| 04:05, 15 June 2011 (EDT)
  • Halopedia Vote Symbol Neutral.svg Neutral - Its well well written but he doesn't seem that important to the halo series.User:Shadowklaw

Oppose

  • Oppose.svg Oppose - Does not exceed the minumum size and does not have many images in the actual article.--The Reborn Qual 'Fulsamee 12:52, 6 April 2011 (EDT)
  • Oppose.svg Oppose - The article is definitely interesting enough to have potential for the title, but its current state doesn't warrant that. - File:Major.png Nìcmávr (Tálk) 14:56, 6 April 2011 (EDT)
  • Oppose.svg Oppose - Do not feel it meets the standards for FA. - S.B.44 [Talk] 16:24, 2 August 2011 (EDT)

Forerunner (Won)

A highly informative, well-written and well-sourced article about one of Halo's primary subjects, a fact helped in no small part by the release of Halo: Cryptum, giving for the first time solid information as to who the hell these guys were. The article exceeds the minimum requirements of size, sources and so forth. - File:Black Mesa.jpg Halo-343 (Talk) 17:25, 25 July 2011 (EDT)

Support

  1. Support.svg Support - As per above proposal. - File:Black Mesa.jpg Halo-343 (Talk) 17:25, 25 July 2011 (EDT)
  2. Support.svg Support - I fully agree with Halo-343. --Courage never dies. 17:31, 25 July 2011 (EDT)
  3. Support.svg Support - An exceptionally fine article. --Jugus (Talk | Contribs) 17:48, 25 July 2011 (EDT)
  4. Support.svg Support - As per above.--1234fansofHalo 00:48, 26 July 2011 (EDT)
  5. Support.svg Support - With Halo Cryptum, we now have so much more information about the Forerunners. Now is one of the best times to have them as a featured article. 'If only it were so easy'. - File:Halo-wars-5-th.jpg CovenantSeparatist 18:31, 28 July 2011 (EDT)

Neutral

Oppose