Talk:Unidentified colony ship: Difference between revisions
From Halopedia, the Halo wiki
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
Well we dont know if they are dead and it can be Sangheili ever think of that or Kig-yar [[Special:Contributions/207.6.168.201|207.6.168.201]] 20:20, 24 February 2011 (EST) | Well we dont know if they are dead and it can be Sangheili ever think of that or Kig-yar [[Special:Contributions/207.6.168.201|207.6.168.201]] 20:20, 24 February 2011 (EST) | ||
Well if it was elites or jackals then the ship would look covenant in design not human[[#@lof@n1234]]-Forgive My English 20:57, 24 February 2011 (EST) | |||
Revision as of 21:57, February 24, 2011
Forerunner Origins?
Does anyone else think that this ship looks almost Forerunner in origin? I'm not suggesting that it is infact a Forerunner ship, but that human technology by the year 2589 has advanced to reverse-engineering of Forerunner technology.--File:PENGUIN4.gifFluffyEmoPenguin(ice quack!) 17:42, 7 November 2010 (EST)
- Or maybe the Covenant has given us (humanity) some of their Forerunner technology in order to repopulate the worlds they glassed during the War. --KaragouniS 19:13, 7 November 2010 (EST)
Well maybe it is a Forerunner ship.I mean all of the forerunner technology that was discovered was destroyed.Plus there are a bunch of Forerunner artifacts under Reach.Plus the covenant technology didin't look like a tenth of the forerunner technology.Plus, I listened to the legendary commentary and they did say it was a colony ship but they didn't say it was UNSC so in my opinion, it is a Forerunner ship with Forerunners in it.Jamesgg521 17:24, 24 November 2010 (EST)
- You can argue that it looks Forerunner, but really, humanity seems top have developed a similar fetish for blocky angles and slants in the 26th century. At times, I thought some of the architecture and geometry in New Alexandria looked very Forerunner. So without any followup material or explanations from Bungie/343i, there seems to be little real evidence that its Forerunner. Forerunner inspired, though, is a different matter - as you said, there's all those relics under Reach, and humanity must spend some time post-war reverse-engineering the portal and other Covenant/Forerunner tech. -- Specops306 Autocrat Qur'a 'Morhek 18:32, 24 November 2010 (EST)
Yes, but what is the proof of it being human in the first place! Thats what Im saying and dont say it said so in the legendary commentary because I watched the ending three times to make sure and they just say colony ship, not human ship in any way.Jamesgg521 19:50, 8 December 2010 (EST)
- It is a UNSC ship. Even if it was co-designed by covenant using forerunner tech, it is still utilized by the UNSC and therefore is a UNSC ship. There's no way it could be forerunner and not be mentioned as being such. If they added a forerunner cameo in Reach that would detract from the whole storyline of the game--File:1221751884 I-animated-this-for-you.gifEnder the XenocideFile:1221751884 I-animated-this-for-you.gif 20:03, 8 December 2010 (EST)
Can someone please show some proof saying that it is Human, Covenant, Sangheili or forerunner before saying it is or it isn't Alertfiend 21:42, 28 January 2011 (EST)
It's simple really the Forerunners are dead, extinct, whatever it can't be Forerunner or Covenant. Covenant ships are bulbous in design. It is human#@lof@n1234 19:24, 4 February 2011 (EST)
Well we dont know if they are dead and it can be Sangheili ever think of that or Kig-yar 207.6.168.201 20:20, 24 February 2011 (EST)
Well if it was elites or jackals then the ship would look covenant in design not human#@lof@n1234-Forgive My English 20:57, 24 February 2011 (EST)