Editing User talk:Parax

{{Welcome|Shade Link|}}

==Welcome to Halopedia!==
[[Image:Monaco.png|right]]
'''Welcome, to Halopedia, the definitive source for ''Halo'' information!'''

Please read [[Halopedia:About|our introduction]], where you'll find out what this site is and what we're trying to accomplish. 

*'''Need help?''' Visit our [[Help:Contents|help]] section where you can find how to [[Help:Images|add images]] and get assistance with [[Help:Editing|editing]].

*'''Sign your edits!''' We only sign our edits when posting on Talk pages; to do this, just put the following code after your post: <nowiki>-- ~~~~</nowiki>.  Then, when you press the "Save Page" button, Halopedia will replace the code with ''your'' username and the time and date you posted! For more information on how to customize your signature visit [[Help:Signatures|our help page]].

'''Want to get involved and active on Halopedia?''' Join one of our [[Halopedia:Groups|usergroups]]!

'''Interested in chatting with fellow users?''' Then check out our [[Halopedia:IRC Channel|IRC channel]]!


==Edit Warring==

There were various sources stating the endangerment of the Skirmisher race, and all you could do was delete the section stating so every time somebody re-added it. Your various summaries went as far as to be considered ''violent'', and somewhat irrational. If it meant so much to you, why couldn't you just place a proposal on the talk page? Edit warring is condemned at the Halopedia, and you're opinion was vastly unpopular. ''Please'' don't keep doing that! Contact me if you want any clarification.--[[User talk:Sangheili Commando 021: Fluffball Gato|Fluffball Gato]] 06:24, June 6, 2010 (UTC)

Mmmmm.... Mmmm hmmm. Yeah, "violent".
#Nothing I stated was violent. Here are my edit summaries: 1. Give me a source on how it is canon. 2. How would you know they were not featured anywhere else because of being rare? They weren't THOUGHT OF until Halo: Reach was being made. And: Because they were thought of specifically for Reach. They weren't made in other games because of being rare, they weren't there because they weren't thought of. Nothing in those two summaries were what you considered "violent".
#''Vastly'' unpopular? The only people that seemed to dislike my "opinion" (which was merely me removing information that wasn't true) was you and JEA13.
#I didn't see any sources stating that Skirmishers weren't put in other games because of being rare. As I have said several times, they weren't ''thought of'' until Halo: Reach was in production.
#I chose the 3 revert rule. If one of you was to put it back, I would have talked about it on the talk page.


I ask for you to reply back about this if you have something else.--'''<span style="background:Black;display:inline-block;height:16px;padding-right:4px;line-height:1em;position:relative;top:-3px;-moz-border-radius:0 50% 50%">[[User:Shade Link|<font color="Blue">Shade</font>]]</span>''' 12:48, June 6, 2010 (UTC)


Forgot to add something: The other admins that protected the page agreed that it wasn't needed. Notice they chose not to add it back. That means they ''also'' believe the information is fake/unneeded.--'''<span style="background:Black;display:inline-block;height:16px;padding-right:4px;line-height:1em;position:relative;top:-3px;-moz-border-radius:0 50% 50%">[[User:Shade Link|<font color="Blue">Shade</font>]]</span>''' 12:49, June 6, 2010 (UTC)

:The above is untrue. I protected the article and chose to just leave the info as it is, while also improve some of the contents (grammar, layout, etc). - <font face="Century Gothic">[[User:Subtank|<font color="gold"><font color="#FF4F00">5</font>əb<font color="#FF4F00">'7</font>aŋk</font>]]<sup>([[User talk:Subtank|<font color="#FF4F00">7alk</font>]])</sup></font> 14:37, June 6, 2010 (UTC)

Also, as much as you claimed my summaries (see above) were violent, they weren't. In fact, I saw some rudeness in ''your'' summaries, rather than mine. Oh, and why exactly is a normal, un-righted user telling me what I am doing "wrong", yet I deleted the false information with good intention?--'''<span style="background:Black;display:inline-block;height:16px;padding-right:4px;line-height:1em;position:relative;top:-3px;-moz-border-radius:0 50% 50%">[[User:Shade Link|<font color="Blue">Shade</font>]]</span>''' 13:06, June 6, 2010 (UTC)

:I meant ''borderline'' violent, you don't have to get so angry about it. =( The only person who thought it was worthy of deletion was you, and your opinion is no greater than anybody else's. I believe you are kind of stepping out of your boundaries for deleting something just because it was your ''opinion''. I didn't mean to sound so accusatory, or make you so upset, but please propose a content deletion if it means ''so'' much to you. Constant deletion is ''not'' the answer, and everybody should follow this rule. --[[User talk:Sangheili Commando 021: Fluffball Gato|Fluffball Gato]] 16:39, June 6, 2010 (UTC)

::Oh, I forgot to add this. Remember how you said how their were no sources to that information? Well, we got it from the Xbox website, where they have said a couple things stating their extinction or near extinction by the Battle of Reach. Here is one that I found, "''It could also introduce such new enemies as Skirmishers and fit them into Halo's lore with the explanation that the vast extent of the battle and destruction of the planet caused their extinction.''" I don't know if that's proof enough for you, so you can search Xbox.com for more. I was just saying that there ''are'' sources, so your deletions are unfounded. --[[User talk:Sangheili Commando 021: Fluffball Gato|Fluffball Gato]] 16:50, June 6, 2010 (UTC)

Once again Fluffball Gato, I wasn't the only one who thought it was worthy of deletion. Also, I wasn't giving an opinion; it's a fact that it is unneeded. I wasn't "stepping out of my borderlines because it was my opinion"; as I have said, Skirmishers weren't created until Halo: Reach was in production. I have another question: Why exactly does my "opinion" (which is not an opinion) not matter, yet ''yours'' does? I am not upset, I am just curious why only your opinion seems to matter. And it wasn't "constant deletion", it was good intention; For the... *counts* 4th or 5th time, Skirmishers weren't absent in other games because of being rare; they just weren't created. I'm not against you or anything, just to let you know.--'''<span style="background:Black;display:inline-block;height:16px;padding-right:4px;line-height:1em;position:relative;top:-3px;-moz-border-radius:0 50% 50%">[[User:Shade Link|<font color="Blue">Shade</font>]]</span>''' 16:54, June 6, 2010 (UTC)

:I don't think you can understand: we ''know'' the Skirmishers weren't in any previous games because they were not thought of. That does not make that trivia entry any less important, as ''canonically'' they were nearly wiped out. Did you skip the source I provided? And your opinion does ''not'' matter less than mine. I was saying that two opinions (which were the ones that weren't really opinions... look at the source!) are better than one. You appear to be the only one to believe that way. The page was not locked because you were "right", it was locked because you wouldn't stop your campaign until it had finished. Just looking at your contributions, I see a pattern. A deletion, a revert, a deletion, another deletion... please consider adding to the wiki, not destroying it. I don't understand why it appears to be so important to delete that ''factual'' information. Sorry, but I am getting really shocked at your reaction, seemingly focused on the smaller things I have said, yet not the bigger picture.--[[User talk:Sangheili Commando 021: Fluffball Gato|Fluffball Gato]] 17:02, June 6, 2010 (UTC)

::Halopedia uses the "two-revert rule" (2RR) as opposed to Wikipedia's 3RR. You're closer to an edit war block than you think.-- '''[[User:Forerunner|<font color="blue">Fore</font>]]''[[User talk:Forerunner|<font color="green">run</font>]]''[[Special:Contributions/Forerunner|<font color="red">ner</font>]]''' 17:47, June 6, 2010 (UTC)

I didn't say it was locked because I was right. I am done arguing anyways, seeing neither of us can exactly listen to each other, Sangheili Commando.--'''<span style="background:Black;display:inline-block;height:16px;padding-right:4px;line-height:1em;position:relative;top:-3px;-moz-border-radius:0 50% 50%">[[User:Shade Link|<font color="Blue">Shade</font>]]</span>''' 17:50, June 6, 2010 (UTC)

Second, I am not "destroying" the wiki. A single user couldn't do that. Don't try to make me look like some blood-sucking villain--'''<span style="background:Black;display:inline-block;height:16px;padding-right:4px;line-height:1em;position:relative;top:-3px;-moz-border-radius:0 50% 50%">[[User:Shade Link|<font color="Blue">Shade</font>]]</span>''' 17:55, June 6, 2010 (UTC)

:Look both of you are wrong for edit-warring and both of you have things wrong such as: Shade Link not destroying this Wiki, and Fluffball Gato was sort of right about the canon thing but just leav most of it alone because new releases cause speculation and leads to edit-wars so it should just be like it should normally until further information is released. {{User:Cally99117/Sig|19:11|June 6}}

Agreed.--'''<span style="background:Black;display:inline-block;height:16px;padding-right:4px;line-height:1em;position:relative;top:-3px;-moz-border-radius:0 50% 50%">[[User:Shade Link|<font color="Blue">Shade</font>]]</span>''' 18:13, June 6, 2010 (UTC)

I wasn't attempting to edit war, which is why I initially contacted you. You said that you wanted evidence, so I gave it to you. I don't understand you're argument, sorry! Anyway, I'll be find to end it right here.--[[User talk:Sangheili Commando 021: Fluffball Gato|Fluffball Gato]] 18:33, June 6, 2010 (UTC)

== So... ==
what could i do?--[[User talk:Shade Link|Shade Link]] 15:36, 8 June 2009 (UTC)
Maybe make a user talk bubble? if only i knew how UberPhoeb made mine on Zeldapedia...

== More userboxes ==

Go [http://halopedian.com/Category:Userboxes here]. <b>[[User:Smoke.|<span style="color:Gray; font-weight:bold; font-family:Tahoma Small Cap">Smoke</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Smoke.|<span style="color:Gray; font-weight:bold; font-family:Tahoma Small Cap">Sound off!</span>]]</sup></b> 16:25, 8 June 2009 (UTC)

I am just looking for how....--[[User talk:Shade Link|Shade Link]] 16:34, 8 June 2009 (UTC)

if you are looking for userboxes too put more info onto your space, go to "community" then "project userbox."if you see a user box you like, then copy and paste the code that is next to it.Also, you can look on other peoples pages for userboxes made by them.Check out mine, i have afew you might interest in.Good day.[[User talk:Strider 658369398|StriderKing-with arms wide open]] 15:39, 31 August 2009 (UTC)

== Haider ==
Bye.(I can get rid of my own posts).'''-- [[User:Ccbermanzzpedia|<font color="red">C</font>]][[User talk:Ccbermanzzpedia|<font color="blue">2</font>]]''' / [[Special:Editcount/Ccbermanzzpedia|C]][[Special:Contributions/Ccbermanzzpedia|<font color="purple">C</font>]] 00:24, September 4, 2009 (UTC)

== Strider ==

Heeeee's baaaaaacccckkkk!!!!!!! <font face="century gothic"><font color="Purple">[[User:General Paradox|<font color="#666666">Lol</font>]]@[[User talk:General Paradox|<font color="#666666">Phailure</font>]]</font></font> 00:07, June 6, 2010 (UTC)



(Just wanted to inform u)

==Thank you!==
<div align="center">
{| align="center" cellspacing="0" style="border: 4px solid green; margin:-top: 5px; margin-bottom: 5px; width: 500px; background: off-white; color: black"
| [[File:HailToTheChief.jpg|250px]]
| style="padding-top: 5px; text-align: center;" | '''[[User:Jack Phoenix|Jack Phoenix]]''' would like to ''thank you'' for voting on [[Halopedia talk:Halopedian of the Month/07 2010|July's Halopedian of the Month]] &mdash; your support is very much appreciated!
|}
</div>
--[[User:Jack Phoenix|Jack Phoenix]] <sub>([[User talk:Jack Phoenix|Contact]])</sub> 15:23, July 1, 2010 (UTC)

==RE: Scarab Signature==
Oh, thanks for letting me know. I wasn't exactly sure what was wrong with it, but I changed the signature out to a standard one. Please let me know if it helped. Sorry about that. :P --[[Blemo]]

==Re: RfA Page==
All RfA pages are protected when closed for archiving reasons and thus are not to be modified in any way after this regardless. Protection just prevents unauthorised changes. - [[File:Major.png|20px]] [[User:Nicmavr|<span style="color:DarkGoldenrod; font-weight:bold; font-family:Arial">Nìcmávr</span>]] <sup><span style="color:DarkGoldenrod">(</span>[[User Talk:Nicmavr|<span style="color:DarkGoldenrod; font-weight:bold">Tálk</span>]]<span style="color:DarkGoldenrod">)</span></sup> 17:16, September 5, 2010 (UTC)

== Re: ==

Done, thanks. - [[File:Major.png|20px]] [[User:Nicmavr|<span style="color:DarkGoldenrod; font-weight:bold; font-family:Arial">Nìcmávr</span>]] <sup><span style="color:DarkGoldenrod">(</span>[[User Talk:Nicmavr|<span style="color:DarkGoldenrod; font-weight:bold">Tálk</span>]]<span style="color:DarkGoldenrod">)</span></sup> 19:05, November 6, 2010 (UTC)

Why did you make a change to my john 117 edit

Why did you just delete my edits on the [[Covenant light cruiser]] and [[Unrelenting]] pages? [[Halo: The Fall of Reach]] clearly states that the Unrelenting had pulse laser turrets, and therefore by extension so would other light cruisers as well. Deleting someone's edits (especially those that are accurate) for no reason is against the rules of this Wiki, so I'm going to change it back and I hope that you realise that what you're doing is not allowed. [[User talk:AlexB1001|AlexB1001]] 17:08, December 5, 2010 (UTC)

No problem, we all make mistakes :D [[User talk:AlexB1001|AlexB1001]] 17:56, December 5, 2010 (UTC)

== Answer ==

No i am not the person who created the Human-Flood Conflict, but it is canon and i would highly recommend reading halo:cryptum because it gives a lot of information about the relationship between humans, forerunners and the flood

== Halo: Cryptum ==

Halo: Cryptum is the new Halo novel that just came out on the 4th by Greg Bear. It's the first book in the Forerunner Saga. [[User talk:Shadowknightsims|Shadowknightsims]] 20:07, January 20, 2011 (UTC)