Talk:Nuclear weapon: Difference between revisions
From Halopedia, the Halo wiki
m (moved Talk:Nuclear Weapon to Talk:Nuclear weapon over redirect: As per new capitalization proposal.) |
(→Fission warheads: new section) |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
==Covenant== | ==Covenant== | ||
Say, did the Covenant have nuclear weapons? Somehow I don't think they do... --[[User:NuparuMahnika|<span style="color: DimGray ">'''''Nup'''''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:NuparuMahnika|<span style="color:DimGray;">(T)</span>]]</sup> 13:07, May 13, 2010 (UTC) | Say, did the Covenant have nuclear weapons? Somehow I don't think they do... --[[User:NuparuMahnika|<span style="color: DimGray ">'''''Nup'''''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:NuparuMahnika|<span style="color:DimGray;">(T)</span>]]</sup> 13:07, May 13, 2010 (UTC) | ||
== Fission warheads == | |||
Why is the UNSC still using nuclear warheads with fissile material, by now they should have converted to pure fusion weapons entirely by now. Considering this is the same UNSC that authorized the SPARTAN-II program to put down rebels, you'd think that they wouldn't be squeamish about introducing relatively practical-for-tactical use WMDs. The only reason why we haven't converted is, besides expenses and technical difficulties, to keep us from throwing them out like candy (not that any sane military would, it's just a figure of speech) since their lack of radioactive fallout consequences make them easier to use and the associated expenses and difficulties, but like I said, the UNSC was willing to go through with the S-IIs, | |||
Revision as of 15:35, February 9, 2014
What relevance does the First Strike cover have to a nuclear bomb? Honour Light Your Way - File:HalfJaw03.jpg Kora ‘Morhek The Battle-Net My Conquests. 04:34, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
Covenant
Say, did the Covenant have nuclear weapons? Somehow I don't think they do... --Nup(T) 13:07, May 13, 2010 (UTC)
Fission warheads
Why is the UNSC still using nuclear warheads with fissile material, by now they should have converted to pure fusion weapons entirely by now. Considering this is the same UNSC that authorized the SPARTAN-II program to put down rebels, you'd think that they wouldn't be squeamish about introducing relatively practical-for-tactical use WMDs. The only reason why we haven't converted is, besides expenses and technical difficulties, to keep us from throwing them out like candy (not that any sane military would, it's just a figure of speech) since their lack of radioactive fallout consequences make them easier to use and the associated expenses and difficulties, but like I said, the UNSC was willing to go through with the S-IIs,