Talk:859 Static Carillon: Difference between revisions
From Halopedia, the Halo wiki
Alex T Snow (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
If you play around with Carillon's designation, you can end up with Master Chief's service tag. (8+5)×9= 117 . I thought it interesting and wonder if it's just a coincidence. Do you guys think this is notable enough to include in the trivia section? [[User:Lord Susto|<span style="color:red">Lord Susto</span>]] 14:56, 29 August 2014 (EDT) | If you play around with Carillon's designation, you can end up with Master Chief's service tag. (8+5)×9= 117 . I thought it interesting and wonder if it's just a coincidence. Do you guys think this is notable enough to include in the trivia section? [[User:Lord Susto|<span style="color:red">Lord Susto</span>]] 14:56, 29 August 2014 (EDT) | ||
:I think it's better if we don't. People seem to want to make connections out of numbers and see things that aren't there and it does become, unnecessary? I'd remove it myself but I guess others wouldn't agree. [[User:Erickyboo|Erickyboo]] ([[User talk:Erickyboo|talk]]) 18:58, 4 September 2014 (EDT) | :I think it's better if we don't. People seem to want to make connections out of numbers and see things that aren't there and it does become, unnecessary? I'd remove it myself but I guess others wouldn't agree. [[User:Erickyboo|Erickyboo]] ([[User talk:Erickyboo|talk]]) 18:58, 4 September 2014 (EDT) | ||
::I agree, you can connect ''any'' number to another if you try hard enough; they need to be fairly obvious and intuitive references. [[User:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] ([[User talk:Alex T Snow|talk]]) 17:04, 5 September 2014 (EDT) | |||
Latest revision as of 17:04, September 5, 2014
Reference to John's spartan tag?[edit]
If you play around with Carillon's designation, you can end up with Master Chief's service tag. (8+5)×9= 117 . I thought it interesting and wonder if it's just a coincidence. Do you guys think this is notable enough to include in the trivia section? Lord Susto 14:56, 29 August 2014 (EDT)
- I think it's better if we don't. People seem to want to make connections out of numbers and see things that aren't there and it does become, unnecessary? I'd remove it myself but I guess others wouldn't agree. Erickyboo (talk) 18:58, 4 September 2014 (EDT)
- I agree, you can connect any number to another if you try hard enough; they need to be fairly obvious and intuitive references. Alex T Snow (talk) 17:04, 5 September 2014 (EDT)