Halopedia talk:Halopedia in the media: Difference between revisions

From Halopedia, the Halo wiki

No edit summary
Line 14: Line 14:
==GamePro==
==GamePro==
Is [http://www.gamepro.com/article/features/214033/why-master-chief-is-so-interesting/ this] notable enough? --<b>[[User:Dragonclaws|<font color="#4D56B1">Dragon<font color="#F28500">c</font>laws</font>]]<sup>([[User talk:Dragonclaws|<font color="#4D56B1">talk</font>]])</sup></b> 02:53, February 19, 2010 (UTC)
Is [http://www.gamepro.com/article/features/214033/why-master-chief-is-so-interesting/ this] notable enough? --<b>[[User:Dragonclaws|<font color="#4D56B1">Dragon<font color="#F28500">c</font>laws</font>]]<sup>([[User talk:Dragonclaws|<font color="#4D56B1">talk</font>]])</sup></b> 02:53, February 19, 2010 (UTC)
==Order==
Should the list be ordered with newer items on the top or on the bottom? The commented text instructs to put newer entries at the top, bur no one has ever done that. One of these needs to change: the list order or the instruction. --<b>[[User:Dragonclaws|<font color="#800080">Dragon<font color="#DE397E">c</font>laws</font>]]<sup>([[User talk:Dragonclaws|<font color="#6600D8">talk</font>]])</sup></b> 12:08, April 14, 2019 (EDT)

Revision as of 12:08, April 14, 2019

Any other mentions in the press? —This unsigned comment was made by Esemono (talkcontribs). Please sign your posts with ~~~~

None that we know of at this point. --ED(talk)(shockfront) 17:00, 3 April 2007 (UTC)

Bungie News

For the record, I did not write that ad. I just posted it for a GamerFocus user who preferred to be anonymous. --Dragonclaws(talk) 06:45, 5 November 2007 (UTC)

The link http://halo.bungie.net/News/Story.aspx?link=905FA5DF-8639-4A69-9C5A-5CF95AE5A0CA is broken =P Tesfan 20:27, 18 November 2007 (UTC)

*shrugs* Bungie keeps revamping their site and breaking all the links. --Dragonclaws(talk) 06:18, 10 May 2008 (UTC)
Here's it in the archive. --Dragonclaws(talk) 19:50, 10 May 2008 (UTC)

GamePro

Is this notable enough? --Dragonclaws(talk) 02:53, February 19, 2010 (UTC)

Order

Should the list be ordered with newer items on the top or on the bottom? The commented text instructs to put newer entries at the top, bur no one has ever done that. One of these needs to change: the list order or the instruction. --Dragonclaws(talk) 12:08, April 14, 2019 (EDT)