Talk:Unidentified Longsword (Installation 00): Difference between revisions

Latest revision as of 16:15, February 13, 2018

I'm going to go ahead and say it should be deleted because it feels unnecessary and does not add much to the fiction. I'm sure that there were many Longsword crashes on Installation 00 and this was only highlighted because we see it a tad bit more.

I agree. This and the Unidentified Longsword (Voi) need to be deleted. Redundant as we would have to have a page for every single miscellaneous vessel that goes down. SLiD1nG Pr0Xy (talk) 10:14, 12 January 2015 (EST)

Revision as of 11:14, January 12, 2015 (edit) ArcticGhostXCV (talk \| contribs) No edit summary ← Older edit		Latest revision as of 16:15, February 13, 2018 (edit) (undo) D9328 (talk \| contribs) No edit summary
Line 1:		Line 1:
	I'm going to go ahead and say it should be deleted because it feels unnecessary and does not add much to the fiction. I'm sure that there were many Longsword crashes on Installation 00 and this was only highlighted because we see it a tad bit more.		I'm going to go ahead and say it should be deleted because it feels unnecessary and does not add much to the fiction. I'm sure that there were many Longsword crashes on Installation 00 and this was only highlighted because we see it a tad bit more.

	I agree. This and the [[Unidentified Longsword (Voi)]] need to be deleted. Redundant as we would have to have a page for every single miscellaneous vessel that goes down. [[User:SLiD1nG Pr0Xy\|SLiD1nG Pr0Xy]] ([[User talk:SLiD1nG Pr0Xy\|talk]]) 10:14, 12 January 2015 (EST)		I agree. This and the Unidentified Longsword (Voi) need to be deleted. Redundant as we would have to have a page for every single miscellaneous vessel that goes down. [[User:SLiD1nG Pr0Xy\|SLiD1nG Pr0Xy]] ([[User talk:SLiD1nG Pr0Xy\|talk]]) 10:14, 12 January 2015 (EST)