35,264
edits
Halopedia talk:Notability policy: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
m (No more "eggheads"!!!!) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 52: | Line 52: | ||
Apologies for taking it a while to put it in. I believe the very wide discretion provided by the current section would give some freedom and guidance to editors as to what would be considered as a "notable quote". At the end, what is important is the ''quotability'' of a quote. — <span style="font-size:14px; font-family:Arial;">[[User:Subtank|<span style="color:#FF4F00;">subtank</span>]]</span> 19:53, 8 February 2014 (EST) | Apologies for taking it a while to put it in. I believe the very wide discretion provided by the current section would give some freedom and guidance to editors as to what would be considered as a "notable quote". At the end, what is important is the ''quotability'' of a quote. — <span style="font-size:14px; font-family:Arial;">[[User:Subtank|<span style="color:#FF4F00;">subtank</span>]]</span> 19:53, 8 February 2014 (EST) | ||
:We could add the bit that randomized gameplay and Firefight lines (well, obviously apart from the aforementioned grunts and the like) can be included in their entirety in sections of their own, despite their often dubious quotability, by virtue of not being listed anywhere else. So, for instance, the [[Gravemind/Quotes|Gravemind]]'s gameplay quotes are fine because they've got to be listed somewhere, whereas random, completely unquotable lines currently on the quote page (e.g. ''"Not by choice."'') can go. --[[User:Jugus|<font color="MidnightBlue"><b>Jugus</b></font>]] <small>([[User talk:Jugus|<font color="Gray">Talk</font>]] | [[Special:Contributions/Jugus|<font color="Gray">Contribs</font>]])</small> 11:37, 19 February 2014 (EST) | |||