Talk:Battle of the Apex

Merge With Battle of the Flood-controlled Shield World

They are the same battle over all, the Battle of the Apex is just a another part to it. Halo-343 10:38, 24 August 2009 (UTC)

Support

Support- As per above suggestion. Halo-343 (Talk) (Contribs) (Edits) 10:38, 24 August 2009 (UTC)

Support- There's no reason they should be treated as separate battles. Also, see my comment on the matter here.--Jugus 10:44, 24 August 2009 (UTC)

Support - Don't see why not, same battle, same thing. - Nìcmávr ^(Tálk) 13:49, 24 August 2009 (UTC)

Oppose

• Merge no longer needed, as mentioned below - Halo-343 (Talk) (Contribs) (Edits) 20:16, September 14, 2009 (UTC)

Merging not necessary anymore

I just made this into a sub-battle of the Battle of the Flood-controlled Shield World, not separate from it as it used to be. The original text i merged into the Battle of the Flood-Controlled Shield World Article. So now everyone should be happy as no merging is necessary.

Merge

I used to defend this article, going so far as to partially rewrite it to be a sub-battle of the Battle of the Flood-controlled Shield World instead of a follow-up to it (like it used to be). I'm not so sure about that anymore. It's just an overly detailed version of the events described in that article and it doesn't have that much content on its own. So at this point, I don't see a good reason for it to exist. Some parts and images of it could be incorporated into the Battle of the Flood-controlled Shield World article, and this could be turned into a redirect as a lot of pages still link to this. --Jugus (Talk | Contribs) 21:02, January 24, 2010 (UTC)

1. Support - As per above. It's just one of those unnecessary sub-battles.--Jugus (Talk | Contribs) 21:02, January 24, 2010 (UTC)

1. Support - I would suggest redirecting to the section of the main article.- 5əb'7aŋk^(7alk) 21:08, January 24, 2010 (UTC)

1. Support - As per Jugus. --Sgt.T.N.Biscuits 23:16, January 24, 2010 (UTC)

1. Support - As per everyone above me. ----"We are not backing down now. Besides, I dont like losing, remember?" Yugiohtipman34 23:28, January 24, 2010 (UTC)

The vote seems to be dead. Does anyone disagree or should I proceed with merging these? Or should we wait until we get more votes? --Jugus (Talk | Contribs) 18:58, April 20, 2010 (UTC)

When a discussion is no longer active, one can assume everyone agrees with the outcome of the discussion. With that said, merge away! :D - 5əb'7aŋk^(7alk) 19:02, April 20, 2010 (UTC)

Done.--Jugus (Talk | Contribs) 19:07, April 20, 2010 (UTC)