Talk:Vindication-class light battleship: Difference between revisions

Talk:Vindication-class light battleship (edit)

705 bytes removed , 10 years ago

m

Reverted edits by Jugus (talk) to last revision by Erickyboo

35,264

edits

@@ Line 3: / Line 3: @@
 :Only one that is canonically acceptable. Can't just "make one up". Unfortunately, not much information is available regarding these types of ships or their individual names. --[[User:Xamikaze330|Xamikaze330]] ([[User talk:Xamikaze330|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Xamikaze330|contribs]]) 17:34, 8 January 2013 (EST)Xamikaze330
 ::What I more meant was something like "Unidentified UNSC capital ship (armored)" or whatever, not pulling a random class name out of a hat. --[[User:WTRiker|WTRiker]] ([[User talk:WTRiker|talk]]) 13:21, 9 January 2013 (EST)
-==Carrier?==
-Is it safe to assume that this ship is of an unidentified '''carrier''' class, according to [http://autodestructdigital.blogspot.com/2012/11/unsc-carrier.html this page]? Note that it also has the "in-atmosphere thrusters"... I know that concept art are not exactly a good source, things can change during development, but in this case there simply isn't any other information. [[User:Imrane-117|Imrane-117]] ([[User talk:Imrane-117|talk]]) 17:38, 7 July 2013 (EDT)
-:I'll ask and see if I'm allowed to tell you what it is. All I can say for now is it's not safe to assume it's a carrier. - [[User:ScaleMaster117|ScaleMaster117]] ([[User talk:ScaleMaster117|talk]]) 21:17, 7 July 2013 (EDT)
 ==Wrong ship!==