29,222
edits
Talk:Main Page/Archive 13: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
m (re-categorisation per CFD, replaced: [[UserWiki: → UserWiki: (3), [[File: → File: (4), [[Image: → File: (15), → {{Unsigned| (5), px → (19), Halopedia:Administrators...) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 281: | Line 281: | ||
The recent rename of the [[Battle of Reach]] to [[Fall of Reach]] reminded me of something I've been meaning to address for some time now. | The recent rename of the [[Battle of Reach]] to [[Fall of Reach]] reminded me of something I've been meaning to address for some time now. | ||
As of now, the names of our battle articles are a mixed bunch. Most pages follow the "Battle of", "Raid on", "Assault on", etc. naming convention, and that's fine. However, we still have pages titled like [[Operation: TORPEDO]] or [[Operation: FIRST STRIKE]] that seem to contradict with the standard naming style. As explained by CommanderTony | As of now, the names of our battle articles are a mixed bunch. Most pages follow the "Battle of", "Raid on", "Assault on", etc. naming convention, and that's fine. However, we still have pages titled like [[Operation: TORPEDO]] or [[Operation: FIRST STRIKE]] that seem to contradict with the standard naming style. As explained by CommanderTony here, we should avoid naming battle articles by the name of the UNSC operation since as a wiki, our viewpoint should be as neutral as possible. | ||
That said, there are exceptions like [[Operation: TREBUCHET]] or [[Operation: KALEIDOSCOPE]] that aren't battles in a sense and as such, the naming isn't that clear cut. That is, we shouldn't just go and rename every "[[operation]]" out there. But ones that are obviously battles, raids or assaults should follow the standard convention, with the name of the UNSC operation obviously mentioned on the page. | That said, there are exceptions like [[Operation: TREBUCHET]] or [[Operation: KALEIDOSCOPE]] that aren't battles in a sense and as such, the naming isn't that clear cut. That is, we shouldn't just go and rename every "[[operation]]" out there. But ones that are obviously battles, raids or assaults should follow the standard convention, with the name of the UNSC operation obviously mentioned on the page. | ||