29,222
edits
Talk:List of REQ cards: Difference between revisions
→Rarity or Name
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 37: | Line 37: | ||
:We can keep similar stuff like skins and so on in the said weapon/vehicle articles. I actually keep that updated quite well actually. So there really isnt any punishment to keep pages in Rarity order. --[[User:CIA391|CIA391]] ([[User talk:CIA391|talk]]) 14:33, 20 September 2015 (GMT) | :We can keep similar stuff like skins and so on in the said weapon/vehicle articles. I actually keep that updated quite well actually. So there really isnt any punishment to keep pages in Rarity order. --[[User:CIA391|CIA391]] ([[User talk:CIA391|talk]]) 14:33, 20 September 2015 (GMT) | ||
::I mean not like that broad but like keep similar weapon cards or vehicle cards near eachother might be good.--[[User:Crisperstorm|Crisperstorm]] ([[User talk:Crisperstorm|talk]]) 09:51, 20 September 2015 (EDT) | ::I mean not like that broad but like keep similar weapon cards or vehicle cards near eachother might be good.--[[User:Crisperstorm|Crisperstorm]] ([[User talk:Crisperstorm|talk]]) 09:51, 20 September 2015 (EDT) | ||
So for anyone outside reading this, this effects the | |||
*Loadout Weapons(potentially) | |||
*Weapon Skins | |||
*Armor/Helmets | |||
*And all the Single use warzone cards | |||
Well I vote Rarity mainly cause I feel its more organised that way(and that majority of the other way can be done on the main pages the weapons are on). | |||
But if the majority think the other way that's fine.-[[User:CIA391|CIA391]] ([[User talk:CIA391|talk]]) 15:02, 20 September 2015 (GMT) | |||