29,532
edits
Talk:ANVIL Station: Difference between revisions
Just more curious why we removed it.
No edit summary |
(Just more curious why we removed it.) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
:I don't think it was explicitly stated that Anvil and the ''Halo 5'' station were one and the same. Unless there is a confirmation, I would avoid saying that. We don't know how many training facilities / space stations the S-IVs have at their disposal. [[User:Imrane-117|Imrane-117]] ([[User talk:Imrane-117|talk]]) 16:41, 25 March 2015 (EDT) | :I don't think it was explicitly stated that Anvil and the ''Halo 5'' station were one and the same. Unless there is a confirmation, I would avoid saying that. We don't know how many training facilities / space stations the S-IVs have at their disposal. [[User:Imrane-117|Imrane-117]] ([[User talk:Imrane-117|talk]]) 16:41, 25 March 2015 (EDT) | ||
::I was just curious why the article was saying that. Seemed weird so I thought I would ask. --[[User:CIA391|CIA391]] ([[User talk:CIA391|talk]]) 21:54, 25 March 2015 (GMT) | ::I was just curious why the article was saying that. Seemed weird so I thought I would ask. --[[User:CIA391|CIA391]] ([[User talk:CIA391|talk]]) 21:54, 25 March 2015 (GMT) | ||
==343 Industries and Microsoft helped develop Anvil== | |||
[[File:Anvil Station Blueprint.png|thumb|300px]] | |||
Well the image that has this is the only source we have. Shouldn't we follow it by the letter till another source goes into more detail. I mean it hasnt stopped us saying 343 Industries made the Fotus armor. And Microsoft must still be a company in the future. I mean its symbol does appear in a easter egg also on a Halo Map also. So I dont see why we should take out that they helped develop this station. --[[User:CIA391|CIA391]] ([[User talk:CIA391|talk]]) 23:25, 28 December 2015 (GMT) | |||