6,257
edits
Halopedia talk:Projects/Timeline/Eras: Difference between revisions
m
→Overhaul of the timeline
Helianthus (talk | contribs) |
Imrane-117 (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 108: | Line 108: | ||
::I was wondering if we could do away with the naming of each era. Maybe a more neutral naming. — <span style="font-size:14px; font-family:Arial;">[[User:Subtank|<span style="color:#FF4F00;">subtank</span>]]</span> 22:09, 17 January 2015 (EST) | ::I was wondering if we could do away with the naming of each era. Maybe a more neutral naming. — <span style="font-size:14px; font-family:Arial;">[[User:Subtank|<span style="color:#FF4F00;">subtank</span>]]</span> 22:09, 17 January 2015 (EST) | ||
:::That could work. What sort of naming scheme were you thinking of instead? {{User:Helianthus/Sig}} | :::That could work. What sort of naming scheme were you thinking of instead? {{User:Helianthus/Sig}} | ||
::::I like most of what Helianthus said, but I'm still concerned because of the way we're supposed to apply the eras to some articles. For example, Installation 00 and Requiem would fit into the Imperial era because they "existed" at the time, but it has nothing to do with them. Dropping the names and keeping the years only may be better, but less easy to remember. [[User:Imrane-117|Imrane-117]] ([[User talk:Imrane-117|talk]]) 12:54, 18 January 2015 (EST) | |||