Forum:Updating the wiki's look!: Difference between revisions

Line 104: Line 104:


:I'm relying on [http://www.w3schools.com/browsers/browsers_display.asp this source]. The adoption of 1366x768 (and higher screen resolution) is increasing and I think having a fixed width layout would be in the best interest of this wiki in the long run.— <span style="font-size:14px; font-family:Arial;">[[User:Subtank|<span style="color:#FF4F00;">subtank</span>]]</span>  21:59, 12 August 2014 (EDT)
:I'm relying on [http://www.w3schools.com/browsers/browsers_display.asp this source]. The adoption of 1366x768 (and higher screen resolution) is increasing and I think having a fixed width layout would be in the best interest of this wiki in the long run.— <span style="font-size:14px; font-family:Arial;">[[User:Subtank|<span style="color:#FF4F00;">subtank</span>]]</span>  21:59, 12 August 2014 (EDT)
Just gave the fixed width a try. As I'm used to a 1920x1280 page that fills the whole screen, the new format certainly feels very narrow and hauntingly evokes the appearance of Wikia sites with its huge bars of empty space on both sides of the page proper (if this passes, I'd rather we at least implemented some appealing background pattern rather than the dull whiteness). But then again it's true that it would help with standardization. IDK. --[[User:Jugus|<font color="MidnightBlue"><b>Jugus</b></font>]] <small>([[User talk:Jugus|<font color="Gray">Talk</font>]] | [[Special:Contributions/Jugus|<font color="Gray">Contribs</font>]])</small> 00:09, 13 August 2014 (EDT)


=== New logo/background proposal ===
=== New logo/background proposal ===