35,264
edits
Halopedia talk:Manual of Style: Difference between revisions
→Proposal: an end to the obfuscation of article titles: new section
(→Proposal: an end to the obfuscation of article titles: new section) |
|||
| Line 306: | Line 306: | ||
So, if nobody else objects, I'll change the MoS to reflect that stub templates go at the top of the article.--{{User:Spartacus/Sig}} 13:42, 7 March 2013 (EST) | So, if nobody else objects, I'll change the MoS to reflect that stub templates go at the top of the article.--{{User:Spartacus/Sig}} 13:42, 7 March 2013 (EST) | ||
== Proposal: an end to the obfuscation of article titles == | |||
A while ago, I brought up an issue regarding the use of [[:Template:Title]] on [[:Template talk:Title#Regarding usage|said template's talk page]]. I'll just repost a modified version of my original proposal here since one of my core points hasn't changed and neither has our practice. If no one has any massively strong objections to this I'll go and add the instructions regarding the use of the template to the MOS title section. | |||
Currently, our pages use the Title template to hide bracketed disambiguation addenda (see [[Forward Unto Dawn (poem)]], [[Bradley (commander)]]) in article titles. However, this is problematic for a number of reasons. The template is useful for italicizing media titles and so forth, but the addition or omission of parts of the title itself is something I believe we should get rid of. Hiding the addenda can easily lead to confusion as to what the actual title of the page is since it's not very conspicuously visible aside from the URL bar. While looking at the address is hardly a colossal task, it's not something that's immediately obvious to a lot of people. That, and hiding the disambiguation serves no real purpose aside making the title itself slightly prettier, but I might again stress that the purpose of the article title isn't, ultimately, to be pretty or even be the most technically correct or all-encompassing name of the subject. The full title should always be readily available in the introductory paragraph (and in many cases the infobox), while the article title can almost be thought of as a shortcut. | |||
This type of standard is also in place over at Wikipedia: for example, the titles of [[Wikipedia:Joker (comics)|Joker (comics)]] or [[Wikipedia:Flood (Halo)|Flood (Halo)]] aren't rendered as "Joker" or "Flood" even though this would be possible with the title template. I defer to Wikipedia's conventions in this case since while a wiki such as ours obviously differs when it comes to content inclusion policies and the like, their formatting is generally a reliable precedent. --[[User:Jugus|<font color="MidnightBlue"><b>Jugus</b></font>]] <small>([[User talk:Jugus|<font color="Gray">Talk</font>]] | [[Special:Contributions/Jugus|<font color="Gray">Contribs</font>]])</small> 11:42, 23 April 2014 (EDT) | |||