Talk:UNSC Armed Forces: Difference between revisions

Talk:UNSC Armed Forces (edit)

Revision as of 14:43, January 20, 2014

244 bytes added , 10 years ago

m

→‎Do away with the UNSC ranking?

Subtank

24,589

edits

Revision as of 00:13, January 16, 2014 (edit) Braidenvl (talk \| contribs) (→‎Do away with the UNSC ranking?) ← Older edit		Revision as of 14:43, January 20, 2014 (edit) (undo) Subtank (talk \| contribs) m (→‎Do away with the UNSC ranking?) Newer edit →
Line 32:		Line 32:

	:Yea, verily. I'd say perhaps a third of the ranks we have pages for have actually been referenced in official media, the ''Encyclopedia'' notwithstanding. What do you think about having separate pages for enlisted and commissioned ranks? That would prevent the clutter of having every entry on the same page, yet it would still be preferable to the current system. --[[User:Braidenvl\|<span style="color:gray">'''''Our vengeance is at hand.'''''</span>]] [[File:Gravemind.svg\|14px]] ([[User talk:Braidenvl\|<span style="color:gray">Talk to me.</span>]]) 23:13, 15 January 2014 (EST)		:Yea, verily. I'd say perhaps a third of the ranks we have pages for have actually been referenced in official media, the ''Encyclopedia'' notwithstanding. What do you think about having separate pages for enlisted and commissioned ranks? That would prevent the clutter of having every entry on the same page, yet it would still be preferable to the current system. --[[User:Braidenvl\|<span style="color:gray">'''''Our vengeance is at hand.'''''</span>]] [[File:Gravemind.svg\|14px]] ([[User talk:Braidenvl\|<span style="color:gray">Talk to me.</span>]]) 23:13, 15 January 2014 (EST)

			::I'll start an article soon. Somewhere along the lines of "UNSCDF rank structure" perhaps? — <span style="font-size:14px; font-family:Arial;">[[User:Subtank\|<span style="color:#FF4F00;">subtank</span>]]</span> 13:43, 20 January 2014 (EST)