252
edits
User talk:Tacitus: Difference between revisions
→Project Chrysanthemum: new section
(→Project Chrysanthemum: new section) |
|||
| Line 354: | Line 354: | ||
:You probably noticed it already, but that's actually how Installation 07 looked at one time (and how it looks now, according to ''[[Halo: Hunters in the Dark]]''). The hologram in ''Halo 3'' has been established to have been out of date. --[[User:Jugus|Jugus]] ([[User talk:Jugus|talk]]) 10:31, 21 September 2016 (EDT) | :You probably noticed it already, but that's actually how Installation 07 looked at one time (and how it looks now, according to ''[[Halo: Hunters in the Dark]]''). The hologram in ''Halo 3'' has been established to have been out of date. --[[User:Jugus|Jugus]] ([[User talk:Jugus|talk]]) 10:31, 21 September 2016 (EDT) | ||
== Project Chrysanthemum == | |||
[https://www.halopedia.org/index.php?title=Project_CHRYSANTHEMUM&type=revision&diff=1211395&oldid=1211270| Regarding this edit]. I can understand wanting to leave it vague, but i'm more curious as to why you don't think it implies genetic predisposition. Emile's, Jun's, and Kat's articles all use a word that refers to the natural ability of the individual. Whether it be "aptitude", "talents", or "potential" respectively. These words all imply natural inclination to skills. So, it makes sense that these would all be references to predispositions if they are a natural occurrence in the individual in question. Though none of the articles go into detail, they do make an effort to acknowledge the genetic ability of the character. However, in your defense, the only one who doesn't directly state that their skill was from natural ability was Carter's. | |||
On a side note, do you visit any other Halo sites beside this one? I've always wondered but never had an excuse to ask.[[User:Kal825B|Kal825B]] ([[User talk:Kal825B|talk]]) 20:13, 5 April 2017 (EDT) | |||