Template talk:Fan Works: Difference between revisions

m
Line 21: Line 21:


:The Youtube link is meant to demonstrate that site traffic is not a strong proof of popularity. The first I could get off the top of my head. Seems like we have different focus when it comes to assessing through Google. Do mind that I do this with utmost scrutiny. What I focused on is looking through legitimate sites such as press sites, avoid hits that refers back to the content or hits made by fans of that content (usually through fan-sites, -blogs, -forums). For example, fanworks such as [[Halo 2600]] and [[Halo: Out With a Whimper]] attracted legitimate sites that covered their development/release. The following is how I perform my search:
:The Youtube link is meant to demonstrate that site traffic is not a strong proof of popularity. The first I could get off the top of my head. Seems like we have different focus when it comes to assessing through Google. Do mind that I do this with utmost scrutiny. What I focused on is looking through legitimate sites such as press sites, avoid hits that refers back to the content or hits made by fans of that content (usually through fan-sites, -blogs, -forums). For example, fanworks such as [[Halo 2600]] and [[Halo: Out With a Whimper]] attracted legitimate sites that covered their development/release. The following is how I perform my search:
:*Both [https://www.google.com/search?q=%22Company+0051%22+%22Halo%22 Company 0051] and [https://www.google.com/search?q=%22ODS%20Steve%22 ODS Steve"] have small amount of hits. By eliminating deviantart (which is where the the content was released), halowaypoint, bungie.net, bungie.org, rvb's forum and tvtropes, the content has very little legitimate sites covering the content.
:*Both [https://www.google.com/search?q=%22Company+0051%22+%22Halo%22 Company 0051] and [https://www.google.com/search?q=%22ODS%20Steve%22 ODS Steve"] have small amount of hits. By eliminating the source of the content, I then proceed to removing deviantart, halowaypoint, bungie.net, bungie.org, rvb's forum and tvtropes from the search and ended up with no legitimate website covering the content.
:*[https://www.google.com/search?q=%22Sangheili%27s+War%22 Sangheili's War] has similar treatment. I began removing halowaypoint, bungie.net, bungie.org, deviantart, and halofanon (my tribute poem came up on the search? :O). As you said, there are translations, but these are not "legitimate sites covering the content".
:*[https://www.google.com/search?q=%22Sangheili%27s+War%22 Sangheili's War] has similar treatment. I began removing halowaypoint, bungie.net, bungie.org, deviantart, and halofanon (my tribute poem came up on the search? :O). As you said, there are translations, but these are not "legitimate sites covering the content".
:The basis for this strict approach originates from the attempts made to get Halopedia on Wikipedia ([[Wikipedia:Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Halo#Halopedia_on_Wikipedia|see David Fuchs' comment]]). Regardless of popularity, there must be sources that reported the content (where the content is the sole subject of an article). As I said repeatedly, this is to ensure the floodgates to remain tightly closed. — <span style="font-size:14px; font-family:Arial;">[[User:Subtank|<span style="color:#FF4F00;">subtank</span>]]</span>  00:33, 18 March 2013 (EDT)
:The basis for this strict approach originated from the attempts made to get Halopedia on Wikipedia ([[Wikipedia:Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Halo#Halopedia_on_Wikipedia|see David Fuchs' comment]]). Regardless, there must be sources that reported the content (where the content is the sole subject of an article). As I said repeatedly, this is to ensure the floodgates to remain tightly closed. — <span style="font-size:14px; font-family:Arial;">[[User:Subtank|<span style="color:#FF4F00;">subtank</span>]]</span>  00:33, 18 March 2013 (EDT)
24,589

edits