Talk:Raid on High Charity: Difference between revisions

m
→‎Next Battle: clean up, replaced: {{Arby116Sig}} → Arby116
m (→‎Next Battle: clean up, replaced: {{Arby116Sig}} → Arby116)
 
(3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
==Title Change==
==Title Change==


I think the title of this would be better called "Raid to High Charity" since its not like much of a battle....--[[user:SPARTAN-077| The State]]<sup>([[user talk:SPARTAN-077|Our Decrees and Law]])</sup><sup>([[Special:Contributions/SPARTAN-077|The State Alchemists we've enlisted]])</sup>[[Image:ROY!.jpg|25px]] 11:56, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
I think the title of this would be better called "Raid to High Charity" since its not like much of a battle....--[[user:SPARTAN-077| The State]]<sup>([[user talk:SPARTAN-077|Our Decrees and Law]])</sup><sup>([[Special:Contributions/SPARTAN-077|The State Alchemists we've enlisted]])</sup>File:ROY!.jpg|25px]] 11:56, 5 October 2007 (UTC)


I agree. Since MC and the Arbiter were the only UNSC combatants, and there was no Covenant its not really a battle. [[User:Chamboozer|Chamboozer]] 22:04, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
I agree. Since MC and the Arbiter were the only UNSC combatants, and there was no Covenant its not really a battle. [[User:Chamboozer|Chamboozer]] 22:04, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
Line 16: Line 16:
-'''Braidenvl @ 8:23 P.M. 5/3/08'''
-'''Braidenvl @ 8:23 P.M. 5/3/08'''


This page should be renamed. {{Arby116Sig}}
This page should be renamed. Arby116


== Same about their being a Raid/Battle of Installation 04(II) ==
== Same about their being a Raid/Battle of Installation 04(II) ==
Line 24: Line 24:
So who else believes raid of installation 04 warrants its own article? Anyone? --[[User talk:CookieMonstersayshello|CookieMonstersayshello]] 14:17, 2 August 2011 (EDT)
So who else believes raid of installation 04 warrants its own article? Anyone? --[[User talk:CookieMonstersayshello|CookieMonstersayshello]] 14:17, 2 August 2011 (EDT)
:Good question.--[[User:Halofan1234|ハローファン]] ([[User talk:Halofan1234|H1234-NET]]) 14:21, 2 August 2011 (EDT)
:Good question.--[[User:Halofan1234|ハローファン]] ([[User talk:Halofan1234|H1234-NET]]) 14:21, 2 August 2011 (EDT)
I personally think if raid on high charity can have its own article why cant raid on installation 04b have its own article? --[[User talk:CookieMonstersayshello|CookieMonstersayshello]] 14:37, 2 August 2011 (EDT)


==Needed==
==Needed==