1,925
edits
Talk:Main Page: Difference between revisions
→These unnecessary appearances things
| Line 123: | Line 123: | ||
::[[:Category:Appearance templates|There are four appearance templates]]: ''First appearance'', ''First mentioned'', ''Mentioned only'', and ''Indirect mention''. I completely agree with Jugus. There is nothing wrong with being to-the-point. For example, typing <small>(First mentioned)</small> <small>(Mentioned only)</small> is unnecessary and rather messy-looking when it's just as easy to use <small>(First mentioned)</small>. Furthermore, it's not hard to tell which template is used for which circumstance; they say exactly what they mean. --[[User talk:Braidenvl|Courage never dies.]] 18:18, 18 January 2012 (EST) | ::[[:Category:Appearance templates|There are four appearance templates]]: ''First appearance'', ''First mentioned'', ''Mentioned only'', and ''Indirect mention''. I completely agree with Jugus. There is nothing wrong with being to-the-point. For example, typing <small>(First mentioned)</small> <small>(Mentioned only)</small> is unnecessary and rather messy-looking when it's just as easy to use <small>(First mentioned)</small>. Furthermore, it's not hard to tell which template is used for which circumstance; they say exactly what they mean. --[[User talk:Braidenvl|Courage never dies.]] 18:18, 18 January 2012 (EST) | ||
{{C|Technology only}} Excuse my French, but this is fucking bullshit now. I demand we revert this, and in fact, I do not recall ever approving this template for widespread use on the Wiki. Please direct me to where this was made a thing. Grah that is so stupid! 00:54, 13 March 2012 (EDT) | |||
==Halo's Wikipedia article== | ==Halo's Wikipedia article== | ||