Talk:Magnetic Accelerator Cannon: Difference between revisions

Talk:Magnetic Accelerator Cannon (edit)

84 bytes added , 10 years ago

123

edits

Revision as of 12:06, February 20, 2014 (edit) Councilor 'Rumilee (talk \| contribs) (→‎Sorry Folks Teratons is canon) ← Older edit		Revision as of 12:07, February 20, 2014 (edit) (undo) Councilor 'Rumilee (talk \| contribs) (→‎Sorry Folks Teratons is canon) Newer edit →
Line 254:		Line 254:


	That's not an error though. The two MAC round measures are in line with each other (.4c for ship mounted ones and .5c for SMACs) I don't like it, but most recent canon figures outrank old ones. Although I don't like that it says teratons, I do prefer that the SMACs are only around 8-9 times more powerful than ship mounted MACs rather than thousands and thousands of times more powerful. [[User:Councilor 'Rumilee\|Councilor 'Rumilee]] ([[User talk:Councilor 'Rumilee\|talk]]) 11:06, 20 February 2014 (EST)		That's not an error though. The two MAC round measures are in line with each other (.4c for ship mounted ones and .5c for SMACs) I don't like it, but most recent canon figures outrank old ones. Although I don't like that it says teratons, I do prefer that the SMACs are only around 8-9 times more powerful than ship mounted MACs rather than thousands and thousands of times more powerful. Its even a 117 reference, 1.17 teratons. That seems to be an intentional measure. [[User:Councilor 'Rumilee\|Councilor 'Rumilee]] ([[User talk:Councilor 'Rumilee\|talk]]) 11:06, 20 February 2014 (EST)