Talk:Installation 00: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
No edit summary
Line 460: Line 460:


At this point, I'm no so sure it's appropriate to say the Ark was 'destroyed' anymore in any capacity. Structurally it is still intact, it's its environments and life support systems that were damaged. But the Ark itself is still largely whole, as is the moon it strip-mines at its core. So should we still be saying destroyed with these newer revelations?[[User:262VigilantGuardian|262VigilantGuardian]] ([[User talk:262VigilantGuardian|talk]]) 21:58, 20 August 2015 (EDT)
At this point, I'm no so sure it's appropriate to say the Ark was 'destroyed' anymore in any capacity. Structurally it is still intact, it's its environments and life support systems that were damaged. But the Ark itself is still largely whole, as is the moon it strip-mines at its core. So should we still be saying destroyed with these newer revelations?[[User:262VigilantGuardian|262VigilantGuardian]] ([[User talk:262VigilantGuardian|talk]]) 21:58, 20 August 2015 (EDT)
== Status of the Ark 2559 ==
I'm kind of surprised that there is - so far - no mention of the obvious Halo in the Center of the Ark in 2559, I do know it is not known WHICH Installation it is, maybe 04C or 03 (Which is more likely). Or that the Ark seems to recovered fully when it comes to the enviroment. [[Special:Contributions/93.197.97.38|93.197.97.38]] 12:56, 11 July 2016 (EDT)
Anonymous user