Talk:Swords of Sanghelios: Difference between revisions

(→‎Covenant remnant?: new section)
Line 233: Line 233:


Previous colour schemes on various combat harnesses indicate that these are probably majors. Majors in Halo CEA for instance are painted in the same way. However, we need to note that we are talking about the way the UNSC interprets ranks since sometimes there is confusion. For instance the UNSC calls zealot a rank but the covenant treats it as a class with a ranking system that varies from fleet to fleet and chapter to chapter.--[[User:The Master Builder|The Master Builder]] ([[User talk:The Master Builder|talk]]) 08:37, 5 June 2015 (EDT)
Previous colour schemes on various combat harnesses indicate that these are probably majors. Majors in Halo CEA for instance are painted in the same way. However, we need to note that we are talking about the way the UNSC interprets ranks since sometimes there is confusion. For instance the UNSC calls zealot a rank but the covenant treats it as a class with a ranking system that varies from fleet to fleet and chapter to chapter.--[[User:The Master Builder|The Master Builder]] ([[User talk:The Master Builder|talk]]) 08:37, 5 June 2015 (EDT)
== Covenant remnant? ==
While it is true that the SoS was created as a "splinter" of the original Covenant and in spite of the fact that it is still considered, or at least ''was'' considered, by some in the UNSC as the legitimate successor to the Covenant, given new information from the Universe articles as well as comments made by SoS members in H2A and H5G in which members of Thel's faction instead refer to Jul 'Mdama's forces as the "Covenant", should the Swords of Sanghelios still be considered a "Covenant Remnant"? I suppose it comes down to whether or not the umbrella term of "Covenant remnants" applies to all former members of the Covenant or simply the ones that still consider themselves to be "Covenant". --[[User:Cyrannian|Cyrannian]] ([[User talk:Cyrannian|talk]]) 20:23, 18 July 2015 (EDT)
26

edits