3,280
edits
Forum:Disney getting serious with Star Wars canon: Difference between revisions
Forum:Disney getting serious with Star Wars canon (view source)
Revision as of 12:48, January 11, 2014
, 10 years agoDoing you a favor subs :)
mNo edit summary |
Killamin7i (talk | contribs) m (Doing you a favor subs :)) |
||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
:Time will tell if the Halo universe becomes too fragmented with too many new secondary characters and too many new plotlines, but I seriously doubt 343's going to make too many mistakes there. Halo 2 was a lesson they will refer to, where too many directions and an unnecessary second point of view did exactly what so many Star Wars novels are guilty of. (Seriously, almost every single one has two or more main characters)--[[Special:Contributions/70.70.8.253|70.70.8.253]] 10:00, 11 January 2014 (EST) | :Time will tell if the Halo universe becomes too fragmented with too many new secondary characters and too many new plotlines, but I seriously doubt 343's going to make too many mistakes there. Halo 2 was a lesson they will refer to, where too many directions and an unnecessary second point of view did exactly what so many Star Wars novels are guilty of. (Seriously, almost every single one has two or more main characters)--[[Special:Contributions/70.70.8.253|70.70.8.253]] 10:00, 11 January 2014 (EST) | ||
::It's an observation: I was merely pointing out one of many possible futures of the ''Halo'' franchise as well as giving out my doubt of Frankie's handling of the ''Halo'' canon (oh, this is more of a criticism than it is a complaint). ''Halo'' franchise is comparable to the ''Star Wars'' franchise as it is already considered as the new "Star Wars" for this age (debatable of course). Whatever changes made to the ''Star Wars'' franchise will eventually be made to the ''Halo'' franchise as well. It chimes. It's the natural progression of entertainment franchise. Time will tell. :) 10:24, 11 January 2014 (EST) | ::It's an observation: I was merely pointing out one of many possible futures of the ''Halo'' franchise as well as giving out my doubt of Frankie's handling of the ''Halo'' canon (oh, this is more of a criticism than it is a complaint). ''Halo'' franchise is comparable to the ''Star Wars'' franchise as it is already considered as the new "Star Wars" for this age (debatable of course). Whatever changes made to the ''Star Wars'' franchise will eventually be made to the ''Halo'' franchise as well. It chimes. It's the natural progression of entertainment franchise. Time will tell. :) — <span style="font-size:14px; font-family:Arial;">[[User:Subtank|<span style="color:#FF4F00;">subtank</span>]]</span> 10:24, 11 January 2014 (EST) | ||
:::I agree Subtank. Halo 4 was a clear example of mishandling the Halo universe (and Halo gameplay) with all the inconsistencies and retcons. And it stretches even further with the whole Forerunner saga imo (splitting the Didact in 2, the humans being separate from the Forerunners). I was content with a more realistic story string & continuation of the Halo series but 343i did too much and also deviated towards unrealistic plot lines and science fanasy elements imo. And it seems like they may stretch the series thin with those "12" issues of Halo escalation. Not to say I don't like Halo escalation, it looks interesting (I haven't gotten a copy of the issues since I'm waiting for Mortal Dictata which will be my LAST Halo novel purchase). It may just result in more stuff that makes it seem like 343i is milking the series rather than supplementing it for the fans. That's why a lot of people said the series should have ended at Halo 3 especially after 343i's poor execution of Halo 4.--'''''[[User:Killamint|<span style="color:Black; font-family: Arial;">Killamint</span>]]''''' <small>['''''[[User talk:Killamint|<font color="Red">Comm</font>]]'''''|'''''[[Special:Contributions/Killamint|<font color="Black">Files</font>]]''''']</small> 11:48, 11 January 2014 (EST) | |||