Talk:Fall of Reach: Difference between revisions

Talk:Fall of Reach (edit)

215 bytes added , 11 years ago

15,412

edits

Revision as of 10:43, May 6, 2013 (edit) Lord Susto (talk \| contribs) (→‎Rename article?) ← Older edit		Revision as of 10:59, May 6, 2013 (edit) (undo) Spartacus (talk \| contribs) (→‎Rename article?) Newer edit →
Line 226:		Line 226:

	:Calling it the fall of reach captivates the uniqueness of the battle and the importance of the planet itself. Reach was special to humanity as it was their most heavily fortified world. It wasn't just another battle, it was “The Fall of Reach!” Quite possibly the most important event central to the Halo mythos. I say let the name be. [[User:Forgotten Helljumper\|Forgotten Helljumper]] ([[User talk:Forgotten Helljumper\|talk]]) 10:43, 6 May 2013 (EDT)		:Calling it the fall of reach captivates the uniqueness of the battle and the importance of the planet itself. Reach was special to humanity as it was their most heavily fortified world. It wasn't just another battle, it was “The Fall of Reach!” Quite possibly the most important event central to the Halo mythos. I say let the name be. [[User:Forgotten Helljumper\|Forgotten Helljumper]] ([[User talk:Forgotten Helljumper\|talk]]) 10:43, 6 May 2013 (EDT)
			::Helljumper highlighted it perfectly. As it is almost universally called the Fall of Reach, we should use the most commonly used name in canon. No need for a change.--{{User:Spartacus/Sig}} 10:59, 6 May 2013 (EDT)