Page history
December 7, 2023
August 22, 2023
August 15, 2023
Reverted edits by 87.80.198.242 (talk) to last revision by Dr Mutran
m−108
no edit summary
+41
no edit summary
+67
July 19, 2023
June 2, 2023
Reverted edits by 87.80.198.242 (talk) to last revision by PorpleBot
m−30
no edit summary
−10
no edit summary
+2
no edit summary
+38
April 12, 2023
December 18, 2022
December 1, 2022
November 30, 2022
November 26, 2022
August 30, 2022
Undo revision 1548212 by BaconShelf (talk) wait no i'm stupid
m−1
Reverted edits by 132.147.113.199 (talk) to last revision by TheArb1ter117
m+1
→Created conflict
−1
August 20, 2022
July 22, 2022
July 11, 2022
Undo revision 1541883 by Revanfear (talk) The edit you reverted is in agreement with what you said, it does not include the visor on the page (compare revisions). It just removes the Banished speculation part, as Bacon said that the Banished manufacturing the visor is not in-universe. See talk?
−17
Whatever they made a visor or not, it doesn't have anything to do with the planet's status. Just putting the source of the information is enough if people are interested. The visor thing doesn't need to be mention in the planet's page.
+17
→Created conflict: If we aren't including the Banished manufacturing the visor as in-universe, the Banished part should be removed altogether. Rather than attributing the "rich in materials that will fuel generations" to the Banished, which the quote doesn't state.
−17
Undo revision 1541880 by Editorguy (talk) I wouldn't take the Visor seriously as an in-universe object anymore than I'd take the MCC visors seriously
−128
Undo revision 1541879 by Revanfear (talk) quote states the visor was made by them, just as the AAP/HEARTPLATE was made by them
+128
→Created conflict
m−128