8,072
edits
Talk:Operation: TORPEDO: Difference between revisions
→Not a pyrrhic Victory
| Line 75: | Line 75: | ||
:'''Reluctantly''' I agree with your point. So if there was say, another company of 300 at the same time, it would not of been pyrrhic? But anyway, well played :) <font color="black">Something<b>Different</b></font> 23:57, 19 April 2011 (EDT) | :'''Reluctantly''' I agree with your point. So if there was say, another company of 300 at the same time, it would not of been pyrrhic? But anyway, well played :) <font color="black">Something<b>Different</b></font> 23:57, 19 April 2011 (EDT) | ||
Another company, do mean of Marines or something? That depends based on the proportion. If say, Spartans are Scorpions, ODSTs are Warthogs, and Marines Mongooses, and Covenant ships Scarabs, then the outcome can be seen like so. | |||
:8 Mongooses lost to defeat Scarabs. = Ah well, they had no chance. But we can replace Mongooses. | |||
:8 Warthogs lost to defeat Scarabs. = Ouch. But we ''might'' be able rough it out. | |||
:8 Scorpions lost defeat Scarabs. = SKJGSDAKRHKABKJAWAAAAAAAAATT!??!!?! | |||
Like that, it all depends on how well the UNSC can recover for what ever it had to sacrifice. So if it had been another company, of Marines or ODSTs, the chances of victory would have been smaller, but the cost of losses would have been different. [[User:Tuckerscreator|<span style="color:#6600cc;">'''''Tuckerscreator'''''</span>]]<sup>([[User talk:Tuckerscreator|<font color="#008000">stalk</font>]])</sup> 00:20, 20 April 2011 (EDT) | |||