64,687
edits
Talk:Orion-class assault carrier: Difference between revisions
m
Text replacement - "" to ""
No edit summary |
m (Text replacement - "" to "") |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Hope we get a view of it== | |||
Hope we'll get a view of one of these someday soon.[[User:262VigilantGuardian|262VigilantGuardian]] ([[User talk:262VigilantGuardian|talk]]) 15:32, 2 September 2015 (EDT) | Hope we'll get a view of one of these someday soon.[[User:262VigilantGuardian|262VigilantGuardian]] ([[User talk:262VigilantGuardian|talk]]) 15:32, 2 September 2015 (EDT) | ||
| Line 14: | Line 15: | ||
== Size of Orion-class assault carrier. == | == Size of Orion-class assault carrier. == | ||
Can we assume the scale comparison between the Orion and RCS-class armored cruiser as canon? If so the Orion-class assault carrier would be 2,240 meters long and 660 meters wide (at widest point). | Can we assume the scale comparison between the Orion and RCS-class armored cruiser as canon? If so the Orion-class assault carrier would be 2,240 meters long and 660 meters wide (at widest point).{{Unsigned|SPARTAN-nylund}} | ||
:These are not official numbers, but I measured my actual Orion resin Fleet Battles miniature and got these numbers: | :These are not official numbers, but I measured my actual Orion resin Fleet Battles miniature and got these numbers: | ||
:Model at 1/20,000 scale: | :Model at 1/20,000 scale: | ||
| Line 30: | Line 32: | ||
:I'm not saying these values should be put on the Orion page unless it's with a caveat that it's based on measurements of a physical model. Hopefully 'official' numbers will be forthcoming someday. | :I'm not saying these values should be put on the Orion page unless it's with a caveat that it's based on measurements of a physical model. Hopefully 'official' numbers will be forthcoming someday. | ||
:-[[User:ScaleMaster117|ScaleMaster117]] ([[User talk:ScaleMaster117|talk]]) 17:04, 26 February 2018 (EST) | :-[[User:ScaleMaster117|ScaleMaster117]] ([[User talk:ScaleMaster117|talk]]) 17:04, 26 February 2018 (EST) | ||
::We can use it. With a note stating its based off the model. I will do it today actually when I get time. Thanks :D --[[User:CIA391|CIA391]] ([[User talk:CIA391|talk]]) 04:31, 27 February 2018 (EST) | |||