Talk:MA37 assault rifle: Difference between revisions

Talk:MA37 assault rifle (edit)

Revision as of 21:54, June 8, 2012

279 bytes removed , 11 years ago

no edit summary

Grizzlei

17,383

edits

Revision as of 20:54, June 8, 2012 (edit) Anonymous ONI agent (talk \| contribs) m (→‎Standard Issue?) ← Older edit		Revision as of 21:54, June 8, 2012 (edit) (undo) Grizzlei (talk \| contribs) No edit summary Newer edit →
Line 13:		Line 13:

	:I think the detail on the weapon is not an error; it is trying to indicate that it is the fourth iteration (or "mark") of MA37 for the Army, which would be considered as the MA5C for the Marines. Oh, do note that the error on the BR85 has been fixed if you check the latest renders closely. The question thus remains: if it is an error, why hasn't it been fixed throughout the three-year development? — <span style="font-size:16px; font-family:OrbitronMedium;">[[User:Subtank\|<span style="color:#FF4F00;">subtank</span>]]</span> 13:52, 8 June 2012 (EDT)		:I think the detail on the weapon is not an error; it is trying to indicate that it is the fourth iteration (or "mark") of MA37 for the Army, which would be considered as the MA5C for the Marines. Oh, do note that the error on the BR85 has been fixed if you check the latest renders closely. The question thus remains: if it is an error, why hasn't it been fixed throughout the three-year development? — <span style="font-size:16px; font-family:OrbitronMedium;">[[User:Subtank\|<span style="color:#FF4F00;">subtank</span>]]</span> 13:52, 8 June 2012 (EDT)

	I know BR85 error has been fixed; I stated so, though not outright. Anyway, things slip under the radar - why do videogames have still have glitches and bugs when they are released? [[User:Anonymous ONI agent\|A.O.A., Administrator of Ace Combat Fanon]] 20:54, 8 June 2012 (EDT)