5,323
edits
Talk:MA37 assault rifle: Difference between revisions
m
→Standard Issue?: replaced: {{User:CommanderTony/Sig}} → CommanderTony
CraZboy557 (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
m (→Standard Issue?: replaced: {{User:CommanderTony/Sig}} → CommanderTony) |
||
| (5 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Archived}} | {{Archived}} | ||
==Effective Range== | ==Effective Range== | ||
so i am not a 100% on how to use sources but i popped my copy of halo reach in and made a shooting range in forge. I could hit fusion coils at 150 yards 5 shots 5 hits, i could hit targets out to about 300 but the accuracy was trash. around 200 meters i was able to land 3 out of 5 but the round would go wide. I had fusion coils every 25 meters so i don't know in between incriminates. | so i am not a 100% on how to use sources but i popped my copy of halo reach in and made a shooting range in forge. I could hit fusion coils at 150 yards 5 shots 5 hits, i could hit targets out to about 300 but the accuracy was trash. around 200 meters i was able to land 3 out of 5 but the round would go wide. I had fusion coils every 25 meters so i don't know in between incriminates. | ||
Don't bother. Unless you're gonna be adding this to the gameplay section, all of the games' weapons can not be used reliably for canon, especially accuracy. If you ARE gonna be adding this to the gameplay section, then simply use this format ''<<nowiki>ref>[http://www.yourvideohere.com/ Assault Rifle Ranges]</ref></nowiki>''. Also, please don't forget to sign your comments. Vegerot goes RAWR! | Don't bother. Unless you're gonna be adding this to the gameplay section, all of the games' weapons can not be used reliably for canon, especially accuracy. If you ARE gonna be adding this to the gameplay section, then simply use this format ''<<nowiki>ref>[http://www.yourvideohere.com/ Assault Rifle Ranges]</ref></nowiki>''. Also, please don't forget to sign your comments. Vegerot goes RAWR! [[User:Vegerot|<span style="color:midnightblue; font-weight:bold">Vegerot</span>]] ([[User talk:Vegerot|<span style="color:grey">talk</span>]]) 22:39, 22 October 2011 (EDT)! | ||
==Standard Issue?== | ==Standard Issue?== | ||
The article says that it is the standard rifle in all UNSC branches, but the MA5C also says that, so are they both in use at the same time by the same branches, or is this the Army rifle, and the MA5C the Marine rifle? <font style="papyrus">[[User:Bioniclepluslotr|<font color="lime">'''Bioniclepluslotr'''</font>]]</font> 18:02, 9 August 2011 (EDT) | The article says that it is the standard rifle in all UNSC branches, but the MA5C also says that, so are they both in use at the same time by the same branches, or is this the Army rifle, and the MA5C the Marine rifle? <font style="papyrus">[[User:Bioniclepluslotr|<font color="lime">'''Bioniclepluslotr'''</font>]]</font> 18:02, 9 August 2011 (EDT) | ||
:Just a holdover from when it was amalgamated into the MA5C article. The MA37 is a variant of the MA5 series of course, with the Mk.IV noted as a model developed alongside the MA5C. Feel free to remove it if you'd like. | :Just a holdover from when it was amalgamated into the MA5C article. The MA37 is a variant of the MA5 series of course, with the Mk.IV noted as a model developed alongside the MA5C. Feel free to remove it if you'd like. [[User:Grizzlei|CommanderTony]] | ||
::If you look at it closely while in forge, it says on the side that the MA37 is a variant of the MA5C.--[[User talk:Sierra 109|Sierra 109]] 11:31, 31 May 2012 (EDT) | ::If you look at it closely while in forge, it says on the side that the MA37 is a variant of the MA5C.--[[User talk:Sierra 109|Sierra 109]] 11:31, 31 May 2012 (EDT) | ||
| Line 16: | Line 14: | ||
:I think the detail on the weapon is not an error; it is trying to indicate that it is the fourth iteration (or "mark") of MA37 for the Army, which would be considered as the MA5C for the Marines. Oh, do note that the error on the BR85 has been fixed if you check the latest renders closely. The question thus remains: if it is an error, why hasn't it been fixed throughout the three-year development? — <span style="font-size:16px; font-family:OrbitronMedium;">[[User:Subtank|<span style="color:#FF4F00;">subtank</span>]]</span> 13:52, 8 June 2012 (EDT) | :I think the detail on the weapon is not an error; it is trying to indicate that it is the fourth iteration (or "mark") of MA37 for the Army, which would be considered as the MA5C for the Marines. Oh, do note that the error on the BR85 has been fixed if you check the latest renders closely. The question thus remains: if it is an error, why hasn't it been fixed throughout the three-year development? — <span style="font-size:16px; font-family:OrbitronMedium;">[[User:Subtank|<span style="color:#FF4F00;">subtank</span>]]</span> 13:52, 8 June 2012 (EDT) | ||
Well, the DMR dispenses the wrong round casing when it fires. Not EVERY single minor error gets connected. --[[User:AlphaBenson|AlphaBenson]] ([[User talk:AlphaBenson|talk]]) 18:29, 28 February 2013 (EST) | |||
== Edit == | |||
I redid my edits that were taken down because I used "I" in them. If anyone wants to make sure I got it right this time it's in the multiplayer section. This is [[User:CraZboy557|<span style="color:orange;">'''craZboy557'''</span>]], signing off. 09:24, 25 January 2013 (EST) | |||
==New Trivia?== | |||
I don't know if anyone ever saw ads for a game called "Zombies Ate My Pizza", but the ads showcase some very distinctive weapons seen only in ''Halo: Reach'', including the MA37 assault rifle, the M392 DMR, and other weapons belonging to other franchises. Has anyone ever noticed this? --'''''[[User:Xamikaze330|<span style="color:Black; font-family: Halo;">Xamikaze330</span>]]''''' <small>['''''[[User talk:Xamikaze330|<font color="Blue">Transmission</font>]]'''''|'''''[[Special:Contributions/Xamikaze330|<font color="Green">Commencing</font>]]''''']</small> 11:08, 6 June 2014 (EDT)Xamikaze330 | |||