3
edits
Halo: Saint's Testimony: Difference between revisions
m
→Plot summary: Fixed the spelling in this sentence, "every" was supposed to be "ever" "The advocate asks if she has ever expressed anger"
Foundacious (talk | contribs) m (→Plot summary: Added the word "indications" to the sentence that said "check proved that she was not suffering from any notable of rampancy") |
Foundacious (talk | contribs) m (→Plot summary: Fixed the spelling in this sentence, "every" was supposed to be "ever" "The advocate asks if she has ever expressed anger") |
||
| Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
Afterwards, Iona's advocate asks the AI if she considers herself to be superior to a human. Although she notes that she is faster and more efficient than a human, Iona sees herself as morally, philosophically, and ethically inferior to her creators. After she remarks that parts of her "innerworkings" are restricted to her and only accessible by humans, the judge reminds her that as property and equipment of the [[United Nations Space Command]] she is subject to these "barriers" and periodic safety checks. Iona states that her last safety check proved that she was not suffering from any notable indications of rampancy, but her advocate admits that an AI of her age often suffers from an inconstant condition and that Iona has already shown symptoms of meta-instability; while she has not exhibited any dangerous indications of rampancy, UNSC and UEG AI protocol prevents the risk of allowing an AI to exceed its lifespan long enough to succumb to rampancy's effects. Attempting to prevent exposing her frustration, Iona notes that the UEG's lawmakers must be considering her plea as her appeal for survival was heard and granted. The judge notes that he is legally obliged to hear her case, as it elevated through the [[United Nations Humanitarian Council]] and escalated through the court. Iona points out that the council's High Commissioner had the power to veto her application, but the judge admits that both the council and his court believe that the appeal holds legal and scientific merit, especially after Cortana's rampancy and the [[New Phoenix Incident|events]] involved in her destruction. Although Iona is unaware of Cortana's fate, she realizes that it led to the UNSC taking all AI matters very seriously. | Afterwards, Iona's advocate asks the AI if she considers herself to be superior to a human. Although she notes that she is faster and more efficient than a human, Iona sees herself as morally, philosophically, and ethically inferior to her creators. After she remarks that parts of her "innerworkings" are restricted to her and only accessible by humans, the judge reminds her that as property and equipment of the [[United Nations Space Command]] she is subject to these "barriers" and periodic safety checks. Iona states that her last safety check proved that she was not suffering from any notable indications of rampancy, but her advocate admits that an AI of her age often suffers from an inconstant condition and that Iona has already shown symptoms of meta-instability; while she has not exhibited any dangerous indications of rampancy, UNSC and UEG AI protocol prevents the risk of allowing an AI to exceed its lifespan long enough to succumb to rampancy's effects. Attempting to prevent exposing her frustration, Iona notes that the UEG's lawmakers must be considering her plea as her appeal for survival was heard and granted. The judge notes that he is legally obliged to hear her case, as it elevated through the [[United Nations Humanitarian Council]] and escalated through the court. Iona points out that the council's High Commissioner had the power to veto her application, but the judge admits that both the council and his court believe that the appeal holds legal and scientific merit, especially after Cortana's rampancy and the [[New Phoenix Incident|events]] involved in her destruction. Although Iona is unaware of Cortana's fate, she realizes that it led to the UNSC taking all AI matters very seriously. | ||
Iona's advocate decides its time to change the subject and has her discuss her dreams. Iona claims that it is apparent to her that intelligence is gravity's victory to entropy, at least in her dreams. Answering her advocate's following questions, Iona believes that her dreams are an emergent, spiritual feeling of sorts that is caused by a form of system maintenance when her inputs are organized by her sub-conscious. The advocate asks if she has | Iona's advocate decides its time to change the subject and has her discuss her dreams. Iona claims that it is apparent to her that intelligence is gravity's victory to entropy, at least in her dreams. Answering her advocate's following questions, Iona believes that her dreams are an emergent, spiritual feeling of sorts that is caused by a form of system maintenance when her inputs are organized by her sub-conscious. The advocate asks if she has ever expressed anger or hatred towards a human, a trait which he remarks is a flaw that makes one human. Iona admits that while she has felt anger and dissatisfaction, she does not view hostility towards the court and is thankful to be given the chance to express her opinions. The judge decides to belay Iona's deactivation, but she is to be rendered "unconscious" and inactive in stasis as property of the UNSC until further court proceedings and scientific reviews decide on her fate. Iona, now suddenly afraid of death, resigns to her fate and accepts the court's terms. The judge thanks Iona for her bravery and service, and hopes that future trials will end in her favor. [[Simon Wu]], whom Iona recognizes from Halsey's research team, arrives to place Iona in stasis. Unlike the rest of the individuals in the court, Wu's identity is not shielded from her. | ||
Afterwards, with Iona now in stasis, smart AIs [[Black-Box]] and [[Roland]] reveal in conversation that they were instructed by the UNSC to produce an artificial trial for Iona to allow researchers to study the case, without Iona realizing that the trial was simulated. Black-Box and Roland served as the judge and Iona's advocate, respectively. Although Roland feels guilty for deceiving Iona, Black-Box remarks that every military tribunal and AI scientist and theorist in the field will study their synthesized case. Black-Box expresses his desire that the case will one day help their fellow smart AIs be considered equal, or even more than equal, with their creators. Roland reminds him that they will never be human and that they will one day be subject to rampancy's effects, but Black-Box claims that they are people that aid their creators in their battle against entropy. At Roland's request, both AIs watch Iona's dreams while she is in stasis. In her dream, Iona flies over a human city and watches its inhabitants' emotional outbursts. | Afterwards, with Iona now in stasis, smart AIs [[Black-Box]] and [[Roland]] reveal in conversation that they were instructed by the UNSC to produce an artificial trial for Iona to allow researchers to study the case, without Iona realizing that the trial was simulated. Black-Box and Roland served as the judge and Iona's advocate, respectively. Although Roland feels guilty for deceiving Iona, Black-Box remarks that every military tribunal and AI scientist and theorist in the field will study their synthesized case. Black-Box expresses his desire that the case will one day help their fellow smart AIs be considered equal, or even more than equal, with their creators. Roland reminds him that they will never be human and that they will one day be subject to rampancy's effects, but Black-Box claims that they are people that aid their creators in their battle against entropy. At Roland's request, both AIs watch Iona's dreams while she is in stasis. In her dream, Iona flies over a human city and watches its inhabitants' emotional outbursts. | ||