5,323
edits
Forum:Gallery Standardization: Difference between revisions
m
→Comments: removed: 20px (4)
Rock-O-Jello (talk | contribs) No edit summary Tag: Mobile edit |
m (→Comments: removed: 20px (4)) |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
So my proposal: Have the images in the gallery go in real life-chronological order based on their perspective media's release date. This would move most of the images from CEA and 2A down further in various article galleries. Ultimately this doesn't really change much, but I just wanted it to be made the standard.[[User:Sith Venator|<span style="color:green">Sith-venator Wavingstrider</span>]] [[File:Fett helmet.jpg|20px]] ([[User talk:Sith Venator|<span style="color:blue">Commlink</span>]]) 13:48, 11 May 2015 (EDT) | So my proposal: Have the images in the gallery go in real life-chronological order based on their perspective media's release date. This would move most of the images from CEA and 2A down further in various article galleries. Ultimately this doesn't really change much, but I just wanted it to be made the standard.[[User:Sith Venator|<span style="color:green">Sith-venator Wavingstrider</span>]] [[File:Fett helmet.jpg|20px]] ([[User talk:Sith Venator|<span style="color:blue">Commlink</span>]]) 13:48, 11 May 2015 (EDT) | ||
==Comments== | ==Comments== | ||
I've been wanting a chronological order too, but I've just been assuming it. I actually would prefer the Gallery to go in order of chronological release date of the media, but with remakes placed right after the originals. It's graphically less smooth of a transition, but I think it's more logical. Of course, I think any functionally important images, such as comparisons and diagrams should go first in a gallery, then the chronological order takes place.-- | I've been wanting a chronological order too, but I've just been assuming it. I actually would prefer the Gallery to go in order of chronological release date of the media, but with remakes placed right after the originals. It's graphically less smooth of a transition, but I think it's more logical. Of course, I think any functionally important images, such as comparisons and diagrams should go first in a gallery, then the chronological order takes place.--[[User:Ender the Xenocide|<font color="Green">Ender the Xenocide]]</font> 14:12, 11 May 2015 (EDT) | ||
:Well as it stands right now this is what galleries are. | :Well as it stands right now this is what galleries are. | ||
<gallery> | <gallery> | ||
| Line 32: | Line 32: | ||
::As I've just mentioned it, I would favour a real world chronological order (ie, from 2001 to 2015), according to release dates. I think it's really helpful to compare how an appearance has evolved through time. It's also more or less easier to find images from a particular game. I think the remakes should belong to 2011 and 2014. When I look for ''CEA'' or ''H2A'' images, it feels awkward that they're in the beginning rather near the end. In my head, ''CEA'' fits between ''Reach'' and ''Halo 4''. Visually, it's more consistent. It's also 343-made. It would be really helpful if the evolution from old design/graphics to new design/graphics was respected. [[User:Imrane-117|Imrane-117]] ([[User talk:Imrane-117|talk]]) 14:25, 11 May 2015 (EDT) | ::As I've just mentioned it, I would favour a real world chronological order (ie, from 2001 to 2015), according to release dates. I think it's really helpful to compare how an appearance has evolved through time. It's also more or less easier to find images from a particular game. I think the remakes should belong to 2011 and 2014. When I look for ''CEA'' or ''H2A'' images, it feels awkward that they're in the beginning rather near the end. In my head, ''CEA'' fits between ''Reach'' and ''Halo 4''. Visually, it's more consistent. It's also 343-made. It would be really helpful if the evolution from old design/graphics to new design/graphics was respected. [[User:Imrane-117|Imrane-117]] ([[User talk:Imrane-117|talk]]) 14:25, 11 May 2015 (EDT) | ||
:::So we got 3 votes for yes and 1 vote for no.[[User:Sith Venator|<span style="color:green">Sith-venator Wavingstrider</span>]] [[File:Fett helmet.jpg|20px]] ([[User talk:Sith Venator|<span style="color:blue">Commlink</span>]]) 14:29, 11 May 2015 (EDT) | :::So we got 3 votes for yes and 1 vote for no.[[User:Sith Venator|<span style="color:green">Sith-venator Wavingstrider</span>]] [[File:Fett helmet.jpg|20px]] ([[User talk:Sith Venator|<span style="color:blue">Commlink</span>]]) 14:29, 11 May 2015 (EDT) | ||
::::Either way, within each game the order should go "concept art" -> "renders/CGI traiers" -> "cinematics" -> "engine cinematics" -> "gameplay" -> "studies/diagrams" -> "promotional material" -> "miscellaneous"-- | ::::Either way, within each game the order should go "concept art" -> "renders/CGI traiers" -> "cinematics" -> "engine cinematics" -> "gameplay" -> "studies/diagrams" -> "promotional material" -> "miscellaneous"--[[User:Ender the Xenocide|<font color="Gray">Ender the Xenocide]]</font> 14:43, 11 May 2015 (EDT) | ||
:::::I feel like it should go concept art>renders/cgi>promotional material (Such as stuff on the covers, as things like [[Scanned]] are there own thing and would go even before the concept art)>cutscenes and gameplay (Going on the order itself of the game's campaign. Things in multiplayer can be arranged however.)>diagrams.[[User:Sith Venator|<span style="color:green">Sith-venator Wavingstrider</span>]] [[File:Fett helmet.jpg|20px]] ([[User talk:Sith Venator|<span style="color:blue">Commlink</span>]]) 14:50, 11 May 2015 (EDT) | :::::I feel like it should go concept art>renders/cgi>promotional material (Such as stuff on the covers, as things like [[Scanned]] are there own thing and would go even before the concept art)>cutscenes and gameplay (Going on the order itself of the game's campaign. Things in multiplayer can be arranged however.)>diagrams.[[User:Sith Venator|<span style="color:green">Sith-venator Wavingstrider</span>]] [[File:Fett helmet.jpg|20px]] ([[User talk:Sith Venator|<span style="color:blue">Commlink</span>]]) 14:50, 11 May 2015 (EDT) | ||