182
edits
Talk:MJOLNIR Powered Assault Armor: Difference between revisions
→To do with the CQB armour
| Line 301: | Line 301: | ||
::::It still has nothing to back it up, period. People have countless times tried to add it and each time it has been removed, because either nobody can word it within an tolerable stance or the way the article was just worked for everybody. I've given it my best shot and where it is, is where it belongs. If It gets removed, then abandon this because it will only end up with the article being locked. You are entitle to your theory and to share it with others, however this site should not be a stable ground for rampant speculation with unjustifiable belief. What you are posting does not belong in an article that is, for better or worse, a description about the armor and what it does. Unless there is a credible piece of evidence to further support your claim, looks alone are simply not justifiable. [[User talk:Durandal-217|Durandal-217]] 01:49, 12 August 2009 (UTC) | ::::It still has nothing to back it up, period. People have countless times tried to add it and each time it has been removed, because either nobody can word it within an tolerable stance or the way the article was just worked for everybody. I've given it my best shot and where it is, is where it belongs. If It gets removed, then abandon this because it will only end up with the article being locked. You are entitle to your theory and to share it with others, however this site should not be a stable ground for rampant speculation with unjustifiable belief. What you are posting does not belong in an article that is, for better or worse, a description about the armor and what it does. Unless there is a credible piece of evidence to further support your claim, looks alone are simply not justifiable. [[User talk:Durandal-217|Durandal-217]] 01:49, 12 August 2009 (UTC) | ||
:::::Eh, I actually like what you did with it. At least you kept it there somewhere this time! Again, I'd say rampant speculation has already claimed the majority of this wiki, and I just don't understand why you're latching on to THIS particular subject so much. Pet project? Just stubborn? Either way, you are in fact titled to your opinion. More so than the rest of us of course. Through it all I still say looks in pictures DO in fact present justifiable support for at least a theory. Artistic license or not, it's still out there and, as both are claimed canon, you have to understand that there are going to be people that question, and people who wouldn't have found an answer. I made my difference, and so am satisfied. Life's good. :D | :::::Eh, I actually like what you did with it. At least you kept it there somewhere this time! Again, I'd say rampant speculation has already claimed the majority of this wiki, and I just don't understand why you're latching on to THIS particular subject so much. Pet project? Just stubborn? Either way, you are in fact titled to your opinion. More so than the rest of us of course. Through it all I still say looks in pictures DO in fact present justifiable support for at least a theory. Artistic license or not, it's still out there and, as both are claimed canon, you have to understand that there are going to be people that question, and people who wouldn't have found an answer. I made my difference, and so am satisfied. Life's good. :D --[[User talk:Nerfherder1428|Nerfherder1428]] 04:18, 12 August 2009 (UTC) | ||
--[[User talk:Nerfherder1428|Nerfherder1428]] 04:18, 12 August 2009 (UTC) | |||
== Ensemble Studios, quite clever == | == Ensemble Studios, quite clever == | ||