Talk:Operation: TORPEDO: Difference between revisions

Talk:Operation: TORPEDO (edit)

Revision as of 20:22, April 19, 2011

532 bytes added , 13 years ago

→‎Not a pyrrhic Victory

SomethingDifferent

102

edits

Revision as of 19:30, April 19, 2011 (edit) Forerunner (talk \| contribs) (→‎Not a pyrrhic Victory) ← Older edit		Revision as of 20:22, April 19, 2011 (edit) (undo) SomethingDifferent (talk \| contribs) (→‎Not a pyrrhic Victory) Newer edit →
Line 51:		Line 51:

	::::It's not deaths, it's replacability that judges what is a pyhrric victory. The Covenant could quickly replace the troops they lost in TORPEDO - it took the UNSC several years, and perhaps an equal number of missed chances, to recover.-- '''[[User:Forerunner\|<font color="blue">Fore</font>]]''[[User talk:Forerunner\|<font color="green">run</font>]]''[[Special:Contributions/Forerunner\|<font color="red">ner</font>]]''''' 19:30, 19 April 2011 (EDT)		::::It's not deaths, it's replacability that judges what is a pyhrric victory. The Covenant could quickly replace the troops they lost in TORPEDO - it took the UNSC several years, and perhaps an equal number of missed chances, to recover.-- '''[[User:Forerunner\|<font color="blue">Fore</font>]]''[[User talk:Forerunner\|<font color="green">run</font>]]''[[Special:Contributions/Forerunner\|<font color="red">ner</font>]]''''' 19:30, 19 April 2011 (EDT)

			:::::It's not replacability! Do you think the covenant could replace 7 warships, a whole refinery and tens ouf thousands of troops and '''Elites''', which stand on equal terms if not greater than the S-11 (Depending on ranks) in the time it takes to produce cheap SPI armour, augment 300 guys and give them training? I find that to be debateable. Anyway, it is simply a numbers game that determines the nature of the victory. Alas, it is not pyrrhic. <font color="black">Something<b>Different</b></font> 20:22, 19 April 2011 (EDT)