Talk:Post-Covenant War conflicts: Difference between revisions

Talk:Post-Covenant War conflicts (edit)

Revision as of 23:05, October 4, 2015

892 bytes added , 8 years ago

→‎The Insurrection's inclusion

Infernal Keeper

272

edits

@@ Line 82: / Line 82: @@
 I'm personally in favor of having a general summary of postwar rebel occurrences on the Insurrection page but moving the more detailed elaboration to this article. "Post-Covenant War conflicts" would also be listed in the "conflict" field of post-war insurgency engagements rather than "Insurrection". What do you think? --[[User:Jugus|<font color="MidnightBlue"><b>Jugus</b></font>]] <small>([[User talk:Jugus|<font color="Gray">Talk</font>]] | [[Special:Contributions/Jugus|<font color="Gray">Contribs</font>]])</small> 02:01, 26 September 2014 (EDT)
 :That sounds good to me.--{{User:Spartacus/Sig}} 13:11, 26 September 2014 (EDT)
+== "Sangheili-Jiralhanae War ==
+Okay, this description has several problems with it. First of all, The Return never implies that the Great Schism is flaring up again after a recession in 2559. In fact, it makes it sound like both sides are losing heart for the conflict. Secondly, the name implies that there's one single and all-encompassing Jiralhanae faction against one Sangheili faction, which is most certainly not the truth. Thirdly, we have absolutely no evidence to suggest the Sangheili are conducting a "genocidal campaign" against the Jiralhanae; the lore at this point all suggests that both sides of the Schism just want the other to stay far away from them. Certainly there are some on both sides in favour of genocide, but certainly not all, and probably not most.
+--[[User:Infernal Keeper|Infernal Keeper]] ([[User talk:Infernal Keeper|talk]]) 23:05, 4 October 2015 (EDT)