Template talk:Disambig header: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
No edit summary
Line 5: Line 5:
:The above definition fits the current situation. I suggest you refrain from the sarcasm and caps in edit summaries, as users won't take you seriously when you do that. This goes as a warning to cool it.--{{User:Spartacus/Sig}} 23:29, 14 December 2014 (EST)
:The above definition fits the current situation. I suggest you refrain from the sarcasm and caps in edit summaries, as users won't take you seriously when you do that. This goes as a warning to cool it.--{{User:Spartacus/Sig}} 23:29, 14 December 2014 (EST)
:Being snarky isn't helping the situation, Noddy. Just state why you felt this template warranted revision in a drastic fashion from its present form and we'll hear you out. It's that simple. Simply give us a heads up. This is a collaborative effort. {{User:Helianthus/Sig}}
:Being snarky isn't helping the situation, Noddy. Just state why you felt this template warranted revision in a drastic fashion from its present form and we'll hear you out. It's that simple. Simply give us a heads up. This is a collaborative effort. {{User:Helianthus/Sig}}
::@Spartacus: "Repeatedly." I'm pretty sure me and Helianthus only undid one edit... Not seeing why you went over-the-top and locked editing on the page for normal users.
::@Helianthus: I guess neither you nor Spartacus bothered to take a look at the minor change I made: I simply added more parameters for pages that mention more than one similarly titled or associated page in the template header.  [[User:Noddy|Noddy]] ([[User talk:Noddy|talk]]) 23:36, 14 December 2014 (EST)
160

edits