Forum:Disney getting serious with Star Wars canon: Difference between revisions

Forum:Disney getting serious with Star Wars canon (view source)

Revision as of 13:02, January 11, 2014

441 bytes added , 10 years ago

m

→‎Comments

Spartacus

15,412

edits

Revision as of 12:52, January 11, 2014 (view source) Killamin7i (talk \| contribs) m (→‎Comments: Oops) ← Older edit		Revision as of 13:02, January 11, 2014 (view source) Spartacus (talk \| contribs) m (→‎Comments) Newer edit →
Line 21:		Line 21:

	:::I agree Subtank. Halo 4 was a clear example of mishandling the Halo universe (and Halo gameplay) with all the inconsistencies and retcons. And it stretches even further with the whole Forerunner saga imo (splitting the Didact in 2, the humans being separate from the Forerunners). I was content with a more realistic story string & continuation of the Halo series but 343i did too much and also deviated towards unrealistic plot lines and science fantasy elements imo. And it seems like they may stretch the series thin with those "12" issues of Halo escalation. Not to say I don't like Halo escalation, it looks interesting (I haven't gotten a copy of the issues since I'm waiting for Mortal Dictata which will be my LAST Halo novel purchase). It seems like 343i is milking the series rather than supplementing it. That's why a lot of people said the series should have ended at Halo 3 especially after 343i's poor execution of Halo 4.--'''''[[User:Killamint\|<span style="color:Black; font-family: Arial;">Killamint</span>]]''''' <small>['''''[[User talk:Killamint\|<font color="Red">Comm</font>]]'''''\|'''''[[Special:Contributions/Killamint\|<font color="Black">Files</font>]]''''']</small> 11:48, 11 January 2014 (EST)		:::I agree Subtank. Halo 4 was a clear example of mishandling the Halo universe (and Halo gameplay) with all the inconsistencies and retcons. And it stretches even further with the whole Forerunner saga imo (splitting the Didact in 2, the humans being separate from the Forerunners). I was content with a more realistic story string & continuation of the Halo series but 343i did too much and also deviated towards unrealistic plot lines and science fantasy elements imo. And it seems like they may stretch the series thin with those "12" issues of Halo escalation. Not to say I don't like Halo escalation, it looks interesting (I haven't gotten a copy of the issues since I'm waiting for Mortal Dictata which will be my LAST Halo novel purchase). It seems like 343i is milking the series rather than supplementing it. That's why a lot of people said the series should have ended at Halo 3 especially after 343i's poor execution of Halo 4.--'''''[[User:Killamint\|<span style="color:Black; font-family: Arial;">Killamint</span>]]''''' <small>['''''[[User talk:Killamint\|<font color="Red">Comm</font>]]'''''\|'''''[[Special:Contributions/Killamint\|<font color="Black">Files</font>]]''''']</small> 11:48, 11 January 2014 (EST)

			''Halo'' becoming the new ''Star Wars'' was inevitable when 343i took over the handling of the universe. Not to say it's all bad, but all the inconsistencies and retcons they've created have been annoying. Not to say they can't be better, but as it stands now that seems a bit far-fetched. @Killamint: I have Issue #1 of ''Escalation'' and I found the storyline to be quite interesting.--{{User:Spartacus/Sig}} 12:02, 11 January 2014 (EST)