Forum:Weapon wish list: Difference between revisions

m
Minor adjustments to my text.
mNo edit summary
m (Minor adjustments to my text.)
Line 7: Line 7:
Those are my Ideas; what are yours? --[[User:Weeping Angel|Weeping Angel]] ([[User talk:Weeping Angel|talk]]) 19:02, 11 May 2013 (EDT)
Those are my Ideas; what are yours? --[[User:Weeping Angel|Weeping Angel]] ([[User talk:Weeping Angel|talk]]) 19:02, 11 May 2013 (EDT)


:Yeah this is something that [[Forum:Halo_4_discussion/Archive#About_the_weapon_sandbox|we discussed]] last year. I said it numerous times that 343i has a lack of creativity. First I would bring back the sentinel beam but maybe as an infantry issued weapon that has a little more power. That would replace the suppressor. I would replace the light rifle with a weapon that shoots a tracer/tracker like beam round up to a certain range. I would replace the boltshot with the unidentified forerunner weapon from the origins video. I would eliminate the scattershot altogether and replace it with the stasis rifle but I would buff it so that the target would take damage as long as they are stuck in the stasis field. The binary rifle wouldn't fire like a regular sniper rifle but instead open up a mini slipspace portal that would allow it to shot a beam round from a distance or through objects. The incinerator cannon wouldn't fire rounds like a rocket launcher nor would it be called an incinerator cannon. Instead I would called it the pulse cannon and make it an infantry version of the particle cannon but retains it's ability to spread rounds on impact. Lastly, non of the forerunner weapons would require reloading energy cores (the dumbest idea ever for forerunner weapons) and run off of battery power. All these ideas will help eliminate weapon redundancy.--'''''[[User:Killamint|<span style="color:Black; font-family: Arial;">Killamint</span>]]''''' <small>['''''[[User talk:Killamint|<font color="Red">Comm</font>]]'''''|'''''[[Special:Contributions/Killamint|<font color="Black">Files</font>]]''''']</small> 01:45, 12 May 2013 (EDT)
:Yeah this is something that [[Forum:Halo_4_discussion/Archive#About_the_weapon_sandbox|we discussed]] last year. I said it numerous times that 343i has a lack of creativity.  All my ideas will help eliminate weapon redundancy. First I would bring back the sentinel beam but maybe as an infantry issued weapon that has a little more power. That would replace the suppressor. I would replace the light rifle with a weapon that shoots a tracer/tracker like beam round up to a certain range. I would replace the boltshot with the [[Unidentified Forerunner weapon|forerunner weapon]] from the origins video but aesthetically look like the [[Burst pistol]] or [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F82g-Cvq7Ig Bishop Beam]. I would eliminate the scattershot altogether and replace it with the [[Stasis rifle]] but I would buff it so that the target would take damage as long as they are stuck in the stasis field. The binary rifle wouldn't fire like a regular sniper rifle but instead open up a mini slipspace portal that would allow it to shoot a beam round from a long distance or through objects. The incinerator cannon wouldn't fire rounds like a rocket launcher nor would it be called an incinerator cannon. Instead I would call it the pulse cannon and make it an infantry version of the particle cannon but retains it's ability to spread rounds on impact. Also, non of the forerunner weapons would require reloading energy cores (the dumbest idea ever for forerunner weapons) and instead, run off of battery power. Lastly I would make them sound beefy cause as of now the scattershot sounds weird & unappealing, and the boltshot sounds weak & stupid. Why 343i just didn't stick with continuity is beyond me.--'''''[[User:Killamint|<span style="color:Black; font-family: Arial;">Killamint</span>]]''''' <small>['''''[[User talk:Killamint|<font color="Red">Comm</font>]]'''''|'''''[[Special:Contributions/Killamint|<font color="Black">Files</font>]]''''']</small> 01:45, 12 May 2013 (EDT)
3,280

edits