Talk:Halo 4: Difference between revisions

314 bytes added ,  12 years ago
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Archived}}
{{Archived}}


== spartan laser ==
== Spartan Laser ==


I wonder if there will be a few more human energy weapons on there ships or portable energy weapons like the spartan laser.  Apparantly halofour follower on youtube said that 343 studios said the unsc is capable of producing really hightec weapons and high tec gadgets now that they are not being pushed on there feet by the covenant. {{unsigned|Spartan Matt}}
I wonder if there will be a few more human energy weapons on there ships or portable energy weapons like the spartan laser.  Apparantly halofour follower on youtube said that 343 studios said the unsc is capable of producing really hightec weapons and high tec gadgets now that they are not being pushed on there feet by the covenant. {{unsigned|Spartan Matt}}
Line 16: Line 16:


::I may have failed the Introduction to Logic paper, but its lessons shall live on in me toying with other people's incorrect assumptions. It is reasonable to assume that, with a Forerunner world, the fleshing out of Forerunner culture and history, the introduction of a "new sandbox", and a "new enemy", that these would be Forerunners. But this is inductive logic - it's probably right. But probability does not mean truth or rule out coincidence. Besides, I'm still clinging to my "cyborg Neanderthal" theory like an Innie to his conspiracy theories - contrary to all evidence before me, and with increasing desperation.  -- [[User:Specops306|<b><font color=indigo>Specops306</font></b>]] [[w:c:halofanon:user:Specops306|<u><i><font color=blue><sup>Autocrat</sup></font></i></u>]] [[User talk:Specops306|<u><i><font color=purple><sup>Qur'a 'Morhek</sup></font></i></u>]] 08:22, 16 April 2012 (EDT)
::I may have failed the Introduction to Logic paper, but its lessons shall live on in me toying with other people's incorrect assumptions. It is reasonable to assume that, with a Forerunner world, the fleshing out of Forerunner culture and history, the introduction of a "new sandbox", and a "new enemy", that these would be Forerunners. But this is inductive logic - it's probably right. But probability does not mean truth or rule out coincidence. Besides, I'm still clinging to my "cyborg Neanderthal" theory like an Innie to his conspiracy theories - contrary to all evidence before me, and with increasing desperation.  -- [[User:Specops306|<b><font color=indigo>Specops306</font></b>]] [[w:c:halofanon:user:Specops306|<u><i><font color=blue><sup>Autocrat</sup></font></i></u>]] [[User talk:Specops306|<u><i><font color=purple><sup>Qur'a 'Morhek</sup></font></i></u>]] 08:22, 16 April 2012 (EDT)
*Not to be a buzz-kill but isn't this topic more like a "speculation" topic rather than an actual discussion? It starts with "I wonder" which was used TWICE. Correct me if I'm wrong but shouldn't this topic have been started/posted under the forums? --[[User talk:Killamint|Killamint]] 12:31, 16 April 2012 (EDT)


== music ==
== music ==
Can we post the music sample on the Halo 4 page or would there be copy right problems?[[User talk:Weeping Angel|Weeping Angel]] 11:37, 16 April 2012 (EDT)
Can we post the music sample on the Halo 4 page or would there be copy right problems?[[User talk:Weeping Angel|Weeping Angel]] 11:37, 16 April 2012 (EDT)
3,280

edits