1,379
edits
mNo edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
:No. Even if the level of canon cannot be concluded, this article and its information should remain. -[[User:TheLostJedi|'''<span style="color:maroon">TheLostJedi</span>''']] 12:48, 5 April 2011 (EDT) | :No. Even if the level of canon cannot be concluded, this article and its information should remain. -[[User:TheLostJedi|'''<span style="color:maroon">TheLostJedi</span>''']] 12:48, 5 April 2011 (EDT) | ||
::I believe that the article should be kept. Canonical or symbolic, the bodies ''still exist''. I feel, therefore, that we sould have an article on them. Rather than simply deleting this legitimate information, we ought to put up a section, marked with the congecture template if needed, that discusses the possible symbolism. Their notability, certainly, decreases if they are merely symbolic, but all the same it should be kept: they can be both symbolic and canonical. Their aspects may be symbolic, but the substance might be canonical. - [[User talk:DefeatingLine|DefeatingLine]] 21:24, 4 April 2012 (EDT) |
edits