474
edits
User talk:Grizzlei: Difference between revisions
→Gueta protection: new section
Forerunner (talk | contribs) |
(→Gueta protection: new section) |
||
| Line 522: | Line 522: | ||
:Your edits to Sangheili were poor quality and unnecessary. Just because it's true doesn't mean that there should be an entire section on it. Then you began an edit war with an administrator and continued to do so after two reasons were given. Afterwards, you edited the Halo: Reach article and changed weapon names despite administratorial ruling earlier that they should not be changed. You then carried on and so were blocked by CommanderTony. If you wish to discuss this matter with the community, use [[Halopedia:IRC Channel|the '''Irk''']]. Sign your edits.-- [[User talk:Forerunner|Forerunner]] 12:33, August 5, 2010 (UTC) | :Your edits to Sangheili were poor quality and unnecessary. Just because it's true doesn't mean that there should be an entire section on it. Then you began an edit war with an administrator and continued to do so after two reasons were given. Afterwards, you edited the Halo: Reach article and changed weapon names despite administratorial ruling earlier that they should not be changed. You then carried on and so were blocked by CommanderTony. If you wish to discuss this matter with the community, use [[Halopedia:IRC Channel|the '''Irk''']]. Sign your edits.-- [[User talk:Forerunner|Forerunner]] 12:33, August 5, 2010 (UTC) | ||
== [[Gueta]] protection == | |||
IMO, I don't really see how ''full protection'' is justified here in response from anon vandalism, I don't really see it as a good idea to block out ''all'' users because of some IP vandalism. Could it be reduced to semi (''[edit=autoconfirmed]'')? Thanks. [[User talk:G35cpe|G35cpe]] 18:41, August 5, 2010 (UTC) | |||