Forum:Subtracting Canon - Brian Reed, Catalog, etc.: Difference between revisions

Forum:Subtracting Canon - Brian Reed, Catalog, etc. (view source)

Revision as of 10:24, July 28, 2014

879 bytes added , 9 years ago

no edit summary

ScaleMaster117

859

edits

Revision as of 09:01, July 28, 2014 (view source) Killamin7i (talk \| contribs) m (→‎Comments) ← Older edit		Revision as of 10:24, July 28, 2014 (view source) ScaleMaster117 (talk \| contribs) No edit summary Newer edit →
Line 35:		Line 35:

	:::::::And that's what I mean by subtrating canon - wasting opporturnites thus reducing the expansion of canon. I was hoping to see what some of these SIII's look like such as Olivia, but nooooo. Instead they are knocked off the list and never heard from ever again. Not a good look for 343I. Perhaps they may explain their deaths later on down the line but I highly doubt it considering how "simple" it was for 343I to write them off. Let's just hope we don't get anymore upsetting news that may further screw up canon.--'''''[[User:Killamin7\|<span style="color:Black; font-family: Arial;">Killamin7</span>]]''''' <small>['''''[[User talk:Killamin7\|<font color="Red">Comm</font>]]'''''\|'''''[[Special:Contributions/Killamin7\|<font color="Black">Files</font>]]''''']</small> 09:01, 28 July 2014 (EDT)		:::::::And that's what I mean by subtrating canon - wasting opporturnites thus reducing the expansion of canon. I was hoping to see what some of these SIII's look like such as Olivia, but nooooo. Instead they are knocked off the list and never heard from ever again. Not a good look for 343I. Perhaps they may explain their deaths later on down the line but I highly doubt it considering how "simple" it was for 343I to write them off. Let's just hope we don't get anymore upsetting news that may further screw up canon.--'''''[[User:Killamin7\|<span style="color:Black; font-family: Arial;">Killamin7</span>]]''''' <small>['''''[[User talk:Killamin7\|<font color="Red">Comm</font>]]'''''\|'''''[[Special:Contributions/Killamin7\|<font color="Black">Files</font>]]''''']</small> 09:01, 28 July 2014 (EDT)

			I agree with some of what's said, but consider that it may be that for reasons unknown to us, they may not want to revisit certain characters or events. We ask what the circumstances are, they tell us, and we get mixed feelings over it. But to say something is 'subtracting from canon'? Canon, as far as I use the term, is what is official according to the property owner. Not what's comfortable or expected by me. Do I like Spartan team Black gone? Those other S-IIIs? Not really, but they are gone. That's canon now. In real life, we'd often like to visit a place or see people but sudden circumstances can render a place or a person gone without warning and in violation of our wishes. Just because something has a 'potential' future use, doesn't mean it needs to see use. -[[User:ScaleMaster117\|ScaleMaster117]] ([[User talk:ScaleMaster117\|talk]]) 10:24, 28 July 2014 (EDT)