47,303
edits
Talk:Ogab'd-pattern anti-aircraft Wraith: Difference between revisions
m
BaconShelf moved page Talk:Type-52 Anti-Aircraft Wraith to Talk:Ogab'd-pattern anti-aircraft Wraith: As per Encyclopedia
m (Robot: Automated text replacement(s)) |
BaconShelf (talk | contribs) m (BaconShelf moved page Talk:Type-52 Anti-Aircraft Wraith to Talk:Ogab'd-pattern anti-aircraft Wraith: As per Encyclopedia) |
||
| (5 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Untitled== | |||
Where was this first seen? [[User:E93|E93]] 21:33, 21 September 2007 (UTC) | Where was this first seen? [[User:E93|E93]] 21:33, 21 September 2007 (UTC) | ||
Update: thanks for new pics, but still need sources [[User:E93|E93]] 21:36, 21 September 2007 (UTC) | Update: thanks for new pics, but still need sources [[User:E93|E93]] 21:36, 21 September 2007 (UTC) | ||
| Line 8: | Line 9: | ||
Yeah, i find all the new stuff and my discovories are whored! lol. Seen all those compiled images circulating on the web of the armor perms and descriptions and names on them? That was mostly my work, and i get no thanks for that! --[[User:Ajax 013|Ajax 013]] 22:17, 21 September 2007 (UTC) | Yeah, i find all the new stuff and my discovories are whored! lol. Seen all those compiled images circulating on the web of the armor perms and descriptions and names on them? That was mostly my work, and i get no thanks for that! --[[User:Ajax 013|Ajax 013]] 22:17, 21 September 2007 (UTC) | ||
/me shrugs, Ajax, you seem to specialize in "Unknown" stuff, oh well, on September 25th all shall be revealed, --[[user:SPARTAN-077| The State]]<sup>([[user talk:SPARTAN-077|Our Decrees and Law]])</sup><sup>([[Special:Contributions/SPARTAN-077|The State Alchemists we've enlisted]])</sup> | /me shrugs, Ajax, you seem to specialize in "Unknown" stuff, oh well, on September 25th all shall be revealed, --[[user:SPARTAN-077| The State]]<sup>([[user talk:SPARTAN-077|Our Decrees and Law]])</sup><sup>([[Special:Contributions/SPARTAN-077|The State Alchemists we've enlisted]])</sup>File:ROY!.jpg|25px]] 22:26, 21 September 2007 (UTC) | ||
Do you guys think that we should merge this article with the other Wraith Article??? | Do you guys think that we should merge this article with the other Wraith Article??? | ||
| Line 23: | Line 24: | ||
:First of all, ''yes you can pilot the Wraith''. And second of all, ''there will be no 4th Halo''. And third of all, ''nobody gives a crap whether you've got Halo 3 or not''. This is a discussion page, so you don't have to tell ppl every little thing you're thinking. | :First of all, ''yes you can pilot the Wraith''. And second of all, ''there will be no 4th Halo''. And third of all, ''nobody gives a crap whether you've got Halo 3 or not''. This is a discussion page, so you don't have to tell ppl every little thing you're thinking. | ||
:There WILL be a 4TH Halo (Halo Reach). You're confusing it with Halo 4, which is completely different and will not be made. [[User talk:Youngrubby|Youngrubby]] 19:57, June 8, 2010 (UTC) | :There WILL be a 4TH Halo (Halo Reach). You're confusing it with Halo 4, which is completely different and will not be made. [[User talk:Youngrubby|Youngrubby]] 19:57, June 8, 2010 (UTC) | ||
::Heh, new info comes to light, eh? Halo 4, all the way! [[User talk:Infernal-Blaze|Infernal-Blaze]] 15:17, 8 November 2011 (EST) | |||
Did you guys not read the page? It's possible to pilot it through a glitch. --[[User:Ajax 013|Ajax 013]] 11:14, 24 October 2007 (UTC) | Did you guys not read the page? It's possible to pilot it through a glitch. --[[User:Ajax 013|Ajax 013]] 11:14, 24 October 2007 (UTC) | ||
| Line 52: | Line 53: | ||
:In the [[Fuel Rod Cannon]] article, it said that the shots from a AA Wraith do home, more so than those of say, a Banshee. What would really need to be changed is the speed of the rounds and how far they travel before exploding. Speeding up the rounds a bit and cutting the range by 1/4 or so seems about right. Also, they sould only be placed on the large maps, such as Sandtrap, Avalanche, and Sandbox, and they would need looooooong respawn times, and maybe should be set to not spawn at start to avoid rushing. --[[User talk:Theend64|Theend64]] 23:31, November 10, 2009 (UTC) | :In the [[Fuel Rod Cannon]] article, it said that the shots from a AA Wraith do home, more so than those of say, a Banshee. What would really need to be changed is the speed of the rounds and how far they travel before exploding. Speeding up the rounds a bit and cutting the range by 1/4 or so seems about right. Also, they sould only be placed on the large maps, such as Sandtrap, Avalanche, and Sandbox, and they would need looooooong respawn times, and maybe should be set to not spawn at start to avoid rushing. --[[User talk:Theend64|Theend64]] 23:31, November 10, 2009 (UTC) | ||
::The concept is good, but to my knowledge, there is no way to make it fire ''only'' at aerial targets. If there was, then there would have to be volumes of code that specify what precisely is in the air and what is not. Either that, or something would have to be added to the whole game that defines each vehicle as an aerial or ground vehicle (something like this already exists in the form of a flag, but it may be difficult if not impossible to use this as the definition here), and then modify the AA-Wraith version of the fuel rod to ''only'' exit the barrel when it is locked on to a vehicle marked as aerial. Other than that, amping the speed and slightly increasing the homing sounds good. Oh, the physics and movement will need to be changed, as I hear tell that this Wraith is much more cumbersome than its blue cousin. | ::The concept is good, but to my knowledge, there is no way to make it fire ''only'' at aerial targets. If there was, then there would have to be volumes of code that specify what precisely is in the air and what is not. Either that, or something would have to be added to the whole game that defines each vehicle as an aerial or ground vehicle (something like this already exists in the form of a flag, but it may be difficult if not impossible to use this as the definition here), and then modify the AA-Wraith version of the fuel rod to ''only'' exit the barrel when it is locked on to a vehicle marked as aerial. Other than that, amping the speed and slightly increasing the homing sounds good. Oh, the physics and movement will need to be changed, as I hear tell that this Wraith is much more cumbersome than its blue cousin. <small><span style="border: 2px solid black; -moz-border-radius:24px">[[User:orionf22|'''<span style="background-color:#787878; color:white; -moz-border-radius-topleft:24px; -moz-border-radius-bottomleft:24px"> ΘяɪɸɴF22 </span>''']][http://halopedian.com/User:orionf22<span style="background-color:#787878; color:firebrick; -moz-border-radius-bottomright:24px; -moz-border-radius-topright:24px"> Me </span>][[User talk:orionf22|<span style="background-color:#787878; color:firebrick; -moz-border-radius-bottomleft:24px; -moz-border-radius-topleft:24px"> Talk </span>]][[Special:Contributions/orionf22|<span style="background-color:#787878; color:firebrick"> Contributions </span>]][http://xfire.com/clans/coag<span style="background-color:#787878; color:gold; -moz-border-radius-bottomright:24px; -moz-border-radius-topright:24px"> <b>CAG</b> </span>]</span></small> 01:11, June 9, 2010 (UTC) | ||
:::I believe when he said "fire only into the air" he meant lock the turret at around an 65º angle. That way, you wouldn't have to specify anything as being air or ground, because it could literally only fire at the air. [[User talk:Infernal-Blaze|Infernal-Blaze]] 15:23, 8 November 2011 (EST) | |||
== Question == | == Question == | ||