317
edits
Four-forty: Difference between revisions
Causing the shelter of ignorance to come crashing down on a daily basis.
m (Reverted edits by 75.108.122.252 (Talk) to last version by Subtank) |
Griever0311 (talk | contribs) (Causing the shelter of ignorance to come crashing down on a daily basis.) |
||
| Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
{{Conjecturalization}} | {{Conjecturalization}} | ||
The size of the projectile causes something of a discrepancy. If it is indeed 440mm, then it is unnecessarily large for an artillery piece especially given the UNSC's use of missiles and rockets instead. If it is .440mm, then it seems too small. However, if the .440 artillery uses [[mass driver]] technology, like that of Harvest, then the size makes much more sense - the kinetic energy imparted by a railgun or coilgun means that the projectile does not need to be particularly large, or even explosive, to inflict tremendous damage upon a target. If it is 440mm, then it may be a ground-based anti-ship weapon. For now, either theory remains conjecture. When contacted, even Eric Nylund could not explain such an oddity. He mentioned, however, that a 440mm cannon could be used against orbital installations.<ref>[[Letter - RE:Four Forty Artillery]]</ref> | The size of the projectile causes something of a discrepancy. If it is indeed 440mm, then it is unnecessarily large for an artillery piece especially given the UNSC's use of missiles and rockets instead. If it is .440mm, then it seems too small. However, if the .440 artillery uses [[mass driver]] technology, like that of Harvest, then the size makes much more sense - the kinetic energy imparted by a railgun or coilgun means that the projectile does not need to be particularly large, or even explosive, to inflict tremendous damage upon a target. If it is 440mm, then it may be a ground-based anti-ship weapon. For now, either theory remains conjecture. When contacted, even Eric Nylund could not explain such an oddity. He mentioned, however, that a 440mm cannon could be used against orbital installations.<ref>[[Letter - RE:Four Forty Artillery]]</ref> | ||
{{Conjecturalization End}} | {{Conjecturalization End}} This however, would only make sense if the weapon was a direct-fire anti-ship magnetic cannon. A .440 magnetic cannon COULD NOT be considered artillery, because it would not be an indirect fire weapon, leaving the 440mm as the only possibility. | ||
==Sources== | ==Sources== | ||