TheArb1ter117's board-to-board with CIA391

It's the "or earlier" part that I am taking issue with. :) Its using her earliest known point of existing as an anchor point in a scenario where it could be any amount of time, I just dont feel comfortable with that vagueness. :) I'll happily discuss this on the server however as I do have plans for infoboxes that involve vague info like this.

Respectfully, my edit on the Gabriela article wasn't an assumption. Gabriela says she was present at the Fall of Reach. And it was the last known location of her and the UNSC Promise of Dawn until they showed up again on Sephune III. So since we know for a fact that she was at the Fall of Reach, her activation date would have to be August 2552 or earlier. I don't see the issue with stating that.