User talk:Rotaretilbo

Hello. I am the other half of Rotaretilbo's split personality. You can call me Brandon. I like food and sleeping. Please, leave a message.

This is where you can find old messages.

User talk:Rotaretilbo/Archive

CAR
Yo, Rot, it's RR! (I just noticed that we both start with the same letter)

I propose that CAR-class and Covenant Heavy Cruiser be merged in light of a line on FS, pg. 167, para. 3, line 2 regarding the distinction between a heavy and a light covvie cruiser.

Cheers,TRU7H 02:26, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
 * RR is proposing changes to Halopedia Canon. Please go to the Classification Canon Discussion page to hear him out. -- Esemono 02:56, 21 January 2007 (UTC)

CPV
I get the "heavy" designator from somewhere in GoO, I think during the Battle of Onyx when the prowler commander says "heavy destroyers". I think.

Need to confirm that.

Thanks!

Cheers,

TRU7H 20:44, 21 January 2007 (UTC)

Halo Fanon
Thought you might want to check it out. It's only starting up, but it should be fun. Later. CaptainAdamGraves 04:08, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

http://halofanon.wikia.com/wiki/Main_Page

FanArt Committee Opening
JohnSpartan117 has been declared MIA as he has not fulfilled his duties as Committee member for a month. As per Halopedia policy his seat will come up for elections starting Jan 25, 2007. The user with the most votes will replace John on the Committee for the remainder of his term, not a full three months.

If you want to have your voice heard in who to replace John go and vote now.

Covenant Ship Canon Debate
The instances where RR and I disagree are few and far between. However, they do occur. One such example is the disagreement concerning CAR-class ships. Another one that is sure to begin will be the CPV-class Heavy Destroyer (where does Heavy come from anyway?). Needless to say, I've updated the Covenant Ship Canon Debate with my argument concerning the CPV-class Heavy Destroyer.
 * --RotBrandon 20:24, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
 * I agree for reasons stated on the Canon page. -- Esemono 01:11, 28 January 2007 (UTC)

Comma in LTJG
Hey Rot. Just a courtesy message to let you know I've redirected Lieutenant Junior Grade (without comma) to Lieutenant, Junior Grade. There is a reference on this page from GoO, plus as I stated earlier the rank namings have followed US style to the letter. I will also include the comma in any pages I can find with it missing. I agree with your initial assessment that Nylund didn't include the comma in FoR & FS, but as you can see from the tone of the reference (a promotion) the comma implies formality that was previously not present. Also Nylund might have ommitted the comma accidentally. Who knows? But I think that with that one reference plus the US argument, the comma should stay. Cheers! --  Manticore  TalkundefinedCSV 15:13, 31 January 2007 (UTC)

re:awards
thnx 4 tidying up my userpage. =D

Cheers,

RelentlessRecusant 00:46, 3 February 2007 (UTC)

A little confused...
"You mentioned earlier that you wished to see where the agreements came to. Well, their probably still lingering at Talk:Sergeant. That is where most of the fighting took place (oddly, not even over ranks, but insignias). I can see where you are coming from concerning troop numbers however. Yamanba has been the advicate for the deletion of many ranks even in the addition of Letter - RE:UNSC Ranking System. I did some follow up with him, and I believe the insignias staid mostly the same as well (his answer was vague, mainly because my question was actually based on the black enamel of Haverson's Lieutenants bars)."

Sorry, I'm a little confused here. What was this in response to? I've contributed to lots of talk pages regarding rank. Cheers,  Manticore  TalkundefinedCSV 09:56, 4 February 2007 (UTC)

Re: Halo Warz Project
I'm glad someone is finally doing something, i thought i was to late. I actually was invited quite a while ago by RR, it's in my archives. Also, thanks for your attention, i'll work out those errors quickly. --Shch 'Nodotee 15:01, 4 February 2007 (UTC)


 * I just haven't posted because I was waiting on someone else. I would've posted a long time ago. And yes, It's quite fine. He was just rambling about a plan that may be put into place anyway. So ya, go right ahead. CaptainAdamGraves 18:37, 4 February 2007 (UTC)


 * Looks good. It's definately going to start some new roleplaying. But I have a question or two. Since the fleet retreated, what are the Covenant and Human roleplayers going to do now, since there is no conflict? Also, why would The Hesperus need to land? Not that it's too important, since I can pretty much roll with anything. The lack of fuel would make sense, kinda, since they had already needed to escape atmosphere once and that would take a considerable amount. But they were docked somewhat next to the Anasazi. Well, it's not a big deal, i'm sure we can get around it. Later. CaptainAdamGraves 22:11, 4 February 2007 (UTC)

Re: Battle of Eridanus II
I've already started writing a history for Battle of Eridanus II, i'll finish it up and send you a copy of my past. --Shch 'Nodotee BattleNet 18:07, 5 February 2007 (UTC)