Talk:Battle of Installation 00

Why does it say second Battle of Installation 00 now?I don't recall there EVER being another one.Sith Venator 02:46, 17 November 2008 (UTC)

The one with Mendicant Bias? --Dragonc laws (talk ) 03:47, 17 November 2008 (UTC)

Maybe,but even so they were 2 different wars thus still wouldn't be a second just a Battle of Instalation 00(Forerunner-Flood War) and Battle of Instalation 00(Human-Covenant War).Sith Venator 23:19, 20 November 2008 (UTC)

New Main Image
This page is mighty impressive yes. But the main image in my opinion ought to be changed. I don't think three ODSTs running in a line showcases this battle appropriately. I don't know what to put in place but I suggest the space battle image, or possibly an image from the ground battle involving large UNSC forces etc. Wr1ghty 10:09, October 3, 2009 (UTC)

Timeline of Battle
Why does it say the battle takes months? It seems like it just take hours (timeline wise)? There doesn't seem to indicate any sleeping time and waiting time and why would it take months to activate the rings if you're already at The Ark?--99.237.222.73 23:08, October 13, 2009 (UTC)

Aegis Fate
Why isn't the Aegis Fate included here? Bungie claims that their multiplayer maps are all more or less canonical, so the map Sandtrap should be enough to warrant its inclusion here. If one needs more evidence: in the initial stages of the Battle of the Ark, six pelicans were launched towards the Ark's surface, however, only three were dropped from the Dawn's cargo bay. This would seem to at least imply a second frigate's presence. D3in0nychu5 23:28, August 28, 2010 (UTC)


 * I guess someone keeps removing it. It sand trap set on 00?--  Fore  run  ner '' 00:19, August 29, 2010 (UTC)