Talk:Main Page

Private Hosting: Halopedia.org
Alright, I've brought this up in the past, and it's about time to make it happen. My name is AgentSeethroo, and I sort of created this site, back on www.halopedia.org, when it was a part of the gamerfocus network. DragonClaws was the first admin that I appointed, and he went from there with keeping up with the 'pedia. He appointed more admins, and when I ran out of funds to keep the site up and running, you guys moved it over to Wikia. Kudos. I'm incredibly happy that the site I created has grown so much. However, when I see that growth, I hate that it's attached to something like Wikia.

I'll give the hosting info to the person that would like to start moving the databases over. Let's get this project going. Email me at AgentSeethroo@gmail.com.

Thanks, -Seethroo


 * Hello sir, and welcome back to Halopedia. Though quite frankly, I don't think we have much of a problem with the fact that we are currently a part of Wikia and Wikia gaming, that goes for me, many other Admins, and a ton of other users. [[Image:United Nations logo.png|35px]] General  Tony ,  Administrator of Halopedia  Talk 2/11/2009


 * Maybe it's a matter of my pride. I dunno. I just think the 'pedia should be independent. Or dependent on me. heh. Update: halopedia.org is totally unavailable now. Does anyone have ideas for a new domain? - TehSeethroo

Featured Content
Does the feature content alway got to be the spiker? Double  Agent   Rtas 'Vadam  22:11, December 2008 (UTC)


 * The Featured Article is now Orbital Drop Shock Trooper. — Lt.   Commander   Kouger  10:22, 1 January 2009 (UTC)

Opening Poll
i closed a poll, but now i can't open it. Bioniclepluslotr 16:23, 3 January 2009 (UTC)


 * And? 02:26, 4 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Something like this doesn't belong on the discussion for the main page...

Halo: Chronicles
Is there currently any work being done on said project, or is it in stasis? Do we have any news on its development? Lieutenant Mcloganator

Date
Dude, images used in the date are wrong. Today's the 01/02/09 (1st Feb 2009). Not 02/01/08. 02 and 01 are plausible due to sequence, but the year is most definately wrong.


 * We use the US date format, hence the 02/01. I've updated the image for 2009 though. 13:14, 1 February 2009 (UTC)