Halopedia talk:Halopedia in the media

Any other mentions in the press?
 * None that we know of at this point. -- ED ( talk )(shockfront) 17:00, 3 April 2007 (UTC)

Bungie News
For the record, I did not write that ad. I just posted it for a GamerFocus user who preferred to be anonymous. --Dragonc laws (talk ) 06:45, 5 November 2007 (UTC)

The link http://halo.bungie.net/News/Story.aspx?link=905FA5DF-8639-4A69-9C5A-5CF95AE5A0CA is broken =P Tesfan 20:27, 18 November 2007 (UTC)


 * * shrugs* Bungie keeps revamping their site and breaking all the links. --Dragonc laws (talk ) 06:18, 10 May 2008 (UTC)


 * Here's it in the archive. --Dragonc laws (talk ) 19:50, 10 May 2008 (UTC)

GamePro
Is this notable enough? --Dragonc laws (talk ) 02:53, February 19, 2010 (UTC)

Order
Should the list be ordered with newer items on the top or on the bottom? The commented text instructs to put newer entries at the top, bur no one has ever done that. One of these needs to change: the list order or the instruction. --Dragonc laws (talk ) 12:08, April 14, 2019 (EDT)


 * Having newer entries at the bottom comes across as more logical to me, so I would vote changing the instruction. --Tacitus (talk) 05:19, April 15, 2019 (EDT)


 * Yea I seem some wikis do the newest to oldest but tbh it just comes off as awkward at times. What Tacitus said, Oldest to newest, seems the better option. I mean we "could" do a thing where "only" the newest item gets put to the top so folks can see the most recent time we were mentioned, but thats pushing stuff.-CIA391 (talk) 11:38, April 15, 2019 (EDT)