User talk:Forerunner

Welcome back
your syspso right on halopedia.fr are still on so your clear to rule again. C F 0 0 1 15:46, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Lol, he wishes he was an administrator here.Bllasae 19:58, 13 June 2008 (UTC)

Vandal tags
Stop removing them. If they're there, they're there for a reason. -- Manticore   (talk)  15:41, 4 June 2008 (UTC)

Vandalism
Don't edit other people's user pages. Bllasae 14:57, 1 July 2008 (UTC)

RE:Edit
Still vandalism. Ask the user.Bllasae 20:41, 1 July 2008 (UTC)


 * I checked his contribs... I don't see vandalism. Do you mind linking me to some specif diffs in question? Pryo 'Zarkum,  [ iTalk ] [ iWork ] [ iWrite]|undefined 20:48, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
 * There's vandalism. Look at what Manticore is posted above. Removing vandal tags. Also, I don't see how this concerns you.Bllasae 20:49, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Don't delete them from the pages anyways. Also, "illegal", I downgraded it from 3 back to 1. Also, a "sockpuppet" is an account created by the same user in order to take the blame for something, or to help vote for something.Bllasae 00:55, 2 July 2008 (UTC)

Installation 01/07 screwup
Yes, they installation 01 and 07 pictures are messed up. Surface01 needs to be on Installation 01 and vice versa. My internet connection is being very slow, so I can't really do that right now.User0(contribs)(talk) 19:52, 12 July 2008 (UTC)

Template categorisation
Wonderful that you're doing it. But remember to use rather than , because the former will categorise the templates by the name of the template and therefore alphabetically. Thanks. The 888th Avatar (Talk) 14:19, 8 March 2009 (UTC)

Re: Plasma
Thank you Captain Obvious, but you've forgotten something, the forth state of matter being Plasma IS a ionized gas. Different from the properties of normal gasses but still related. A solid projectile coming into contact with Plasma is instantly vaporized on contact because of the intense heat, in the context of the Halo mythology any projectile based weaponry the UNSC has used, (for example Archer Missiles) have been vaporized on contact with any plasma based weapon the Covenant use.

Therefor a 50mm round from a PDG will do very little against the oncoming Plasma Torpedo. Point Defense Guns are only used against incoming attack crafts, they are not used to stop incoming plasma attacks (which is impossible and idiotic anyway) otherwise we would be winning space battles against the Covenant. Durandal-217 20:47, 6 April 2009 (UTC)

Why?
Why are you reverting my correction? Smoke  20:25, 22 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Yeah, they were wrong. I'm pretty sure "it's" is "it is". It is not a possessive noun; it is the exception to the rule. In the case of most other words, adding an apostrophe will signify either a contraction of "(noun) is" or ownership. The word "It" is the exception to the rule. You might want to stop reverting it, as that entire sentence looked bad before I corrected it. I will move it back to what it was before. You can go look it up on dictionary.com or something. Smoke  20:45, 22 April 2009 (UTC)

Team Omega
"as far as we know, it's a Red-op" But how do you know? - TheLostJedi  11:30, 27 May 2009 (GMT)

I'm aware of Reach thanks... your speculation is very logical I admit, but I can't accept it, because purely that's all it is. Various teams merge and change, etc. we both know this, I'd just like a source with clarity to suggest Team Omega as part of Red Team. "used on a mission where Red Team splits up" are you referring to Halo Wars by the way? - TheLostJedi  12:02, 27 May 2009 (GMT)

As you might have gathered, I'm not a fan of that rule, as speculation isn't always true. You mentioned that Red and Blue team never have less than 6 members in their team unless they had to split up, although at Reach, Blue Team was a three member squad comprised of John, James and Linda, this was without splitting up. Also using Halo Wars as the example of Red Team splitting up isn't clarity for me, as we're still debating whether they were part of Red Team in the first place. - TheLostJedi  12:18, 27 May 2009 (GMT)

Hmm, now that sounds appropriate to me. Good thinking... and thanks for the intelligent discussion. - TheLostJedi  12:28, 27 May 2009 (GMT)

Re: Spartan tag
I know that, my point being that I didn't want to just revert someone's undoing of my edit without going to the talk page first. So regardless, There can be Spartans over 150, so it should be added back to the page. And it still clearly says "Sparton 320" in it, which is greater than 300. :( -- DarkJedi613 (Talk) 19:51, 1 June 2009 (UTC)