Talk:Adjutant Reflex

AdjutantReflex appears to be a new AI concerning a new viral marketing campaign for Halo 3. http://www.bungie.net/Forums/posts.aspx?postID=11263399 http://carnage.bungie.org/haloforum/halo.forum.pl?read=808840 It said the date was "871803909 ± 384 hours since event." That puts it at about 99,520.99 years. That coincides with the first firing of the Halo rings, as used by the Forerunners. --TuralX18 00:05, 12 June 2007 (UTC)

Interesting... Can it be confirmed as Bungie/42? -- Dragonc laws ( talk ) 23:59, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
 * 42? Cheers, Relen tless Recu sant 'o the Halopedia Team [[Image:Fleet Admiral.jpg|25px]] TALK • SPEAK 00:01, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
 * 4orty2wo Entertainment, who made ILB and said "no comment" when questioned if they were doing one for Halo 3. -- Dragonc laws ( talk ) 00:06, 12 June 2007 (UTC)

My initial numbers were wrong. (I erroneously used 365 as the number of days in a year, which is not exact) The correct number of years is exactly 99,455 (give or take 16 days). As for the confirmation, it is pretty clear that it is a Bungie/Bungie affiliate (3rd party possibly) event, considering the "AI" has a special status on the Bungie forums. That means it was given the status by one of the guys at Bungie. --TuralX18 00:05, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Okay, thanks. -- Dragonc laws ( talk ) 00:07, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
 * I'd really hate to break the atmosphere, especially with such a tightly-knit tension that AdjutantReflex has brewed over at HBO and Bungie.net...however, the content unfortunately I would not like to remove without some sort of authentication from this mystery user. As aforementioned, if he wants to communicate with me privately, he can email me at alpha_217@verizon.net or pm me at Bungie.net under Relentless70. He has my word that I will not leak anything if he communicates anything with me privately. Cheers, Relen tless Recu sant 'o the Halopedia Team [[Image:Fleet Admiral.jpg|25px]] TALK • SPEAK 01:27, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
 * The AI definately had special status. Yellow text is only used by staff and moderators. Cheers, Relen <font color="#A9A9A9">tless <font color="#808080">Recu <font color="#000000">sant 'o the Halopedia Team [[Image:Fleet Admiral.jpg|25px]] <font color="#A9A9A9">TALK • <font color="A9A9A9">SPEAK 00:11, 12 June 2007 (UTC)


 * Please don't spread more misinformation about AdjutantReflex -- people are relying on Halopedia as a source in AdjutantReflex discussions, and when Halopedia says that AdjutantReflex is a forerunner artificial intelligence construct, people believe it. The problem is that this information is UNCONFIRMED.  We who are following this breaking story closely will be happy to provide updates to Halopedia as necessary, but in your zeal to be the first to make new Halopedia content, please do not speculate beyond what we know already.  Thank you. Foman123 00:49, 12 June 2007 (UTC)

I was thinking the same thing. That's why I didn't put anything on the actual page, instead I just posted it here in the discussion. Who did put up that information? --TuralX18 01:11, 12 June 2007 (UTC)


 * RelentlessRecusant and myself. We really did have to post something, though. -- Dragon<font color="FF0000">c laws ( talk ) 01:16, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Definately. I am waiting for a reply from Foman123 before removing any content. Cheers, <font color="#D3D3D3">Relen <font color="#A9A9A9">tless <font color="#808080">Recu <font color="#000000">sant 'o the Halopedia Team [[Image:Fleet Admiral.jpg|25px]] <font color="#A9A9A9">TALK • <font color="A9A9A9">SPEAK 01:18, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
 * If he is 42, I doubt you'll get a response. They don't like to acknowledge that it's a game until it's over as to not break the atmosphere. -- Dragon<font color="FF0000">c laws ( talk ) 01:24, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
 * 'd really hate to break the atmosphere, especially with such a tightly-knit tension that AdjutantReflex has brewed over at HBO and Bungie.net...however, the content unfortunately I would not like to remove without some sort of authentication from this mystery user. As aforementioned, if he wants to communicate with me privately, he can email me at alpha_217@verizon.net or pm me at Bungie.net under Relentless70. He has my word that I will not leak anything if he communicates anything with me privately. Cheers, <font color="#D3D3D3">Relen <font color="#A9A9A9">tless <font color="#808080">Recu <font color="#000000">sant 'o the Halopedia Team [[Image:Fleet Admiral.jpg|25px]] <font color="#A9A9A9">TALK • <font color="A9A9A9">SPEAK 01:27, 12 June 2007 (UTC

He's completely correct though. There is no confirmation that it is Forerunner, or even an AI, at all. That is all assumption, yet it is presented as if it were factual. --TuralX18 02:17, 12 June 2007 (UTC)

I was thinking about what one of the guys said about not jumping to the conclusion about it being a forerunner AI, so a strange idea came to me, 'What if AdjutantReflex is the name of the cortana/gravemind meld?' Again, this is just an idea, but sometimes when to identities meld, they become some1 entirely different. They may have the memories of both, but the personality is greatly different from both originals. PS: these are only my opinions and idea. plus it's bungie, and that makes any idea possible -- Sailic 15:51, 18 June 2007 (UTC)

Focus
Should the focus of this article be AdjutantReflex the character, or the ongoing realworld event? -- Dragon<font color="FF0000">c laws ( talk ) 04:28, 12 June 2007 (UTC)

I think we'll have to wait an see how the scenario develops. If the "AI" turns out to be giving information from itself (Its own perspective), rather than just general information, then it should be focused on the AI as a being. If not, it could be shifted to whatever this event turns out to be named.--TuralX18 06:19, 12 June 2007 (UTC)

Hey if this guy hit HBO and Bnet we could be next. I suggest we be a little more careful before reverting cryptic edits.-- MCPO Spartan  1138  19:38, 15 June 2007 (UTC)

He left HBO after the first day, and he will stay only on Bungie.net. Anything not on Bungie.net from the AR account is fake. End of story. --TuralX18 19:42, 15 June 2007 (UTC)

This is Interesting, Whoever thought this up sure has a creative mind. -- <font color="#D3D3D3">WR <font color="#A9A9A9">A <font color="#808080">IT <font color="#000000">H  COMM   CONTRIBS  19:50, 15 June 2007 (UTC)

It could only make the situation to be stranger and even more mysterious if he went to more halo websites ,we don't have alot information about him/her/ yet, for all we know he might come here to halopedia? P.S. he kind of scares me when you think about it.--0nyx Sp1k3r 15:16, 16 June 2007 (UTC)BLARG!!!

He might, but he won't. Bungie knows that it would be impossible to verify the integrity of the "AI" if he went to random sites. They will keep all updates on Bungie.net so that everyone can be sure the updates are real. Again, if it isn't on Bungie.net, it is fake. Period. --TuralX18 18:05, 16 June 2007 (UTC)

Is it possible that this number is actually a timestamp? It could be possible, though I haven't checked it out. . . --CXA26483 01:58, 18 June 2007 (UTC)

Ark
I think this thing is the intelligence behind the Ark, possibly the gray Monitor. Its avatar is the same symbol observed by N'chala as he watched the Ark being built. -- Dragon<font color="FF0000">c laws ( talk ) 22:44, 15 June 2007 (UTC)

Pattern
Cortana letters, I love bees, AdjutantReflex. A pattern or coincidence?-- MCPO Spartan  1138  03:31, 16 June 2007 (UTC)


 * What pattern? They are all in the same category of publicity stunts, but I don't see a pattern. -- Dragon<font color="FF0000">c laws ( talk ) 05:20, 16 June 2007 (UTC)

i see a pattern, but not what spartan 1138 said, AdjutantReflex seems like a monitor name... guilty spark, penitent tangent, and now adjutant reflex fludz &#39;carnttuchmee 14:14, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

Rip Off
I for one object to stealing the article from Bungiepedia. While it may be legal, it just seems tacky. We should come up with our own article even if we end up covering the same subject matter. -- Dragon<font color="FF0000">c laws ( talk ) 20:05, 16 June 2007 (UTC)

Is it possible that the time given by Adjutant is a timestamp? I haven't checked this out, but it could be possible. ..