Talk:Battle of Installation 00

Second Battle of Installation 00
Why does it say second Battle of Installation 00 now?I don't recall there EVER being another one.Sith Venator 02:46, 17 November 2008 (UTC)

The one with Mendicant Bias? --Dragonc laws (talk ) 03:47, 17 November 2008 (UTC)

Maybe,but even so they were 2 different wars thus still wouldn't be a second just a Battle of Instalation 00(Forerunner-Flood War) and Battle of Instalation 00(Human-Covenant War).Sith Venator 23:19, 20 November 2008 (UTC)

New Main Image
This page is mighty impressive yes. But the main image in my opinion ought to be changed. I don't think three ODSTs running in a line showcases this battle appropriately. I don't know what to put in place but I suggest the space battle image, or possibly an image from the ground battle involving large UNSC forces etc. Wr1ghty 10:09, October 3, 2009 (UTC)

Timeline of Battle
Why does it say the battle takes months? It seems like it just take hours (timeline wise)? There doesn't seem to indicate any sleeping time and waiting time and why would it take months to activate the rings if you're already at The Ark?--99.237.222.73 23:08, October 13, 2009 (UTC)

Aegis Fate
Why isn't the Aegis Fate included here? Bungie claims that their multiplayer maps are all more or less canonical, so the map Sandtrap should be enough to warrant its inclusion here. If one needs more evidence: in the initial stages of the Battle of the Ark, six pelicans were launched towards the Ark's surface, however, only three were dropped from the Dawn's cargo bay. This would seem to at least imply a second frigate's presence. D3in0nychu5 23:28, August 28, 2010 (UTC)


 * I guess someone keeps removing it. It sand trap set on 00?--  Fore  run  ner '' 00:19, August 29, 2010 (UTC

infobox
the battle infobox is misleading. the separatists and forerunners are not part of the unsc. it appears to be an issue with the template itself 02:04, 2 December 2010 (EST)


 * fixed--Ender the Xenocide 02:15, 2 December 2010 (EST)
 * "covenant separatists" still appears as a division of "UNSC" 05:10, 2 December 2010 (EST)

000 Tragic Solitude
As the monitor of 00 wouldn't Solitude be in control of the Sentinels on the Ark that were encountered on The Ark (level)? If so shouldn't it be included in the infobox? Col.  Snipes  4  50  12:16, 21 July 2015 (EDT)
 * Yeah I'll add him. (unrelated side note my post at the top of the page from 2008 really comes off as rude) Sith Venator Mega Blastoise.gif ( Dank Memes ) 14:15, 21 July 2015 (EDT)

Operation: BLIND FAITH
Source for operation: BLIND FAITH ? 78.221.172.106 20:47, 30 August 2015 (EDT)
 * Page 57 of the Halo Encyclopedia, as shown in the article here.-- 20:50, 30 August 2015 (EDT)

Raid on Installation 04B?
Should the Raid on Installation 04B be classed as part of the Battle of Installation 00 or not? I ask this because the raid on 04B did not occur on the Ark and it took place after the Covenant and Truth were defeated (and High Charity destroyed). So should it be included in the 'Aftermath' portion of the article instead, along with its influence in the info box removed? thoughts?--Paulhalo121 (talk) 07:23, 22 April 2016 (EDT)
 * I believe it should count as part of the battle. John, Thel and Johnson were still in combat with the Flood, just as the UNSC-Sangheili forces on the Ark's surface were, and Installation 04B's destruction was instrumental in wiping out the remaining Flood on the Ark. Also, although it was a different structure, the ring was in basically the same location as Installation 00. -- Topal the Pilot Blueteam.png ( Talk | Contribs ) 08:49, 22 April 2016 (EDT)

Needs Condensing
This article is in some SERIOUS need of condensing. The edit made in July 2018 added so much unnecessary Detail that the actual main points of the battle are lost due to every single unit ever faced in the campaign is named. If someone could condense this to keep it on point and accurate that would be great. It’s nearly unreadable in this state Camelboiis (talk) 12:08, May 1, 2021 (EDT)