Talk:List of Ships

The following article has now been cleaned up by the user WRAITH and ia awaiting a check-over by a admin. -- WR A IT H  COMM   CONTRIBS  07:10, 9 June 2007 (UTC)

This seems rather redundant when we already have Category:Star Ships. --Dragonclaws 02:53, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
 * I created this because I felt that that category is a disaster, no offense intended. This will be a centralized core of starship information, by race (human or the joint races of the Covenant, classification (Marathon-class Cruiser, etc...), and will provide basic info for everyy ship. Thanks. Cheers,  Relentless Recusant [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] 12:50, 25 November 2006 (UTC)

I think this is nicly laid out --Climax Viod 21:12, 3 December 2006 (UTC)

on the UNSC Frigate it says it has 3 shiva nuclear missles but on the dedicated frigate page it says that it only has one, which is it?--Omrifere 20:34, 24 December 2006 (UTC)

All UNSC APOC FFG Missile Frigates have 3 Shiva Tactical Nuclear Missile Launchers --DarkAngel 12:00, 15 January 2007 (UTC)

Halyon class
I added the description, may need some clean up, btw Halo needs to be added to Destroyed on Pillar of autumn. Also an article should be added to describe the armor of a halyon class ship, it is useful. I might make it at around 6 EST. -Lt.O&#39;Brien 22:20, 11 January 2007 (UTC)

never mind what i said about the armors page i found it.

The Halcyon summary seems somewhat confusing as it mixes the original Halycon and the refit, giving the impression this class is fairly useless. That is correct for the original but the refit made this class significantly more combat capable. I think the first paragraph should refer to the Halcyon-class ships in their original status (not very combat capable) and then the second paragrah should address the refitted version mentioning its honeycomb armour structure for the refit and focussing on its MAC's ability to fire three rounds per charge and the high speed overburn of the engines --Johnmcl7 03:06, 1 April 2007 (UTC)

Ship weapons
Guys i know that you are completly deidicated to canon, even tho the ships in FLCE are designed on how books etc describe them they arent correct to every last detail. However all the weapons and the amount each ship can carry could problerly be asked for off Sully, the mods designer, and these are correct. -- DarkAngel 16:04, 13 January 2007 (UTC).

Complete Ship list
Im am currently on a project to list all Covenant and UNSC ships. --DarkAngel 12:13, 15 January 2007 (UTC)

Laden
I am confused; is Laden a class of ships or a ship? Respect them Grunts, --Mouse among men 06:44, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
 * In TFoR, it is referred to as a specific ship, the ship that John's team hides aboard to get into the Eridanus Secundus asteroid base. In FS, it is suddenly and inexplicably the name for a class of ship, the Laden-class freighter. Probably an oversight on Nylund's part. -Azathoth 15:22, 24 February 2007 (UTC)

This might be of help [| Letters of Canon]Raptor117 00:14, 28 February 2007 (UTC)

What th?
How Come there is 2 titles saying carrier?

Second to that maybe I should change that=D

dibs,

James R etere N obody   Noone to talk to  +  Nothing here  +  False Character

New Starship Class Heavy Destroyer
found this at HBO http://nikon.bungie.org/wallpaper.html?item=478 its the 3 pictures in the second row the picture even has specs in it i'm not sure if it is an actual class of starship but the pictures and descriptions are superb if someone wants to make a page for it they can

Albatross Transport
I noticed the Albatross is not represented in this article. Should it acompany the Pelican under "Dropships"? Bullitt Time 13:26, 11 March 2007 (UTC)


 * That's what I was thinking, too. BTW, if you're not busy, since you're working on cleaning this article up, do you think you could help me out at User:Guesty-Persony-Thingy/List of Starships? If you look at the things above Frigate, inclusive, you'll see what I'm doing, so if you could just help out with that, it would be much appreciated. =D g u e s t y -p e r s <font color="#0000cc">o <font color="#000066">n <font color="#000000">y -<font color="#000000">t <font color="#007700">h <font color="#00cc00">i <font color="#00ff00">n <font color="#44ff44">g <font color="#99ff99">y  01:08, 11 March 2007 (UTC)

I think its fixed
I recomend that this page is fixed and should be taken off the improvement drive, as it has been on their a long time and i am sure something else could be fixed, also i beliave it can be deemed fixed because their is nothing wrong with it. --Jameogle 09:40, 2 April 2007 (UTC)

In Amber Clad!!!
Should In Amber Clad be listed as destroyed; as a far I know High Charity and so to I.A.C. should still be intact. I think Unoperational would be a better status. RSVP. Fork 00:42, 14 April 2007 (UTC)

Meh Starship page!
I was working on cleaning this up a while back, and forgot about it... but anyway, it's at User:Guesty-Persony-Thingy/List of Starships, and IMO it's better, because it doesn't have info about different ship classes, and it's just a list, as the name says. Should we change it to be like that, or something else? 24.251.106.233 04:18, 15 April 2007 (UTC)

Enough Already
No offensive to the guys who want to keep this page, but we REALLY need a new improvement drive!!! This one has been up ever since my memory can remember. What else is there to fix? It's also hard to get promoted in the COH and UNSCOH when there is nothing to majorly improve. Fork 22:09, 23 April 2007 (UTC)


 * Umm... there's a reason the CoH and UoH have their own improvement articles... <font color="#000000">G <font color="#770000">ü <font color="#cc0000">é <font color="#ff0000">ß <font color="#ff3333">Ł <font color="#ff6666">¥ -<font color="#9999ff">∏ <font color="#6666ff">é <font color="#3333ff">Ґ <font color="#0000ff">∫ <font color="#0000cc">ø <font color="#000066">ñ <font color="#000000">¥ -<font color="#000000">† <font color="#007700">ħ <font color="#00cc00">î <font color="#00ff00">И <font color="#44ff44">g <font color="#99ff99">¥  22:45, 23 April 2007 (UTC)

Organization
I too was trying to put my info on the page, but after it got hectic I just stopped. Seriously, if there's no new improvement drive on the way, then maybe we can get better organized and tone it down a bit, you know, so it's not so crazy.

Note: I mean absolutely no offense to anyone, i'm just giving my opinion. User:TheNewbHunter/TheNewbHunter