Halopedia talk:Halopedian of the Month/07 2010

According to the Self-Voting Amendment, users may no longer vote for themselves until someone votes for them first.

Votes

 * Jugus - Has been a dedicated and active contributor this month, with plenty of good-quality edits, vandalism reverts and article cleanup. Commander Silver Leaf.PNG Nìcmávr  ( Tálk ) 17:46, October 3, 2009 (UTC)
 * Jugus - OF COURSE. - JEA13  [ iTalk  ] 18:46, October 3, 2009 (UTC)
 * Jugus - One of the most active users I see on everyday. --  General5 7    talk    contribs    email   21:32, October 3, 2009 (UTC)
 * Galacticdominator - I changed my mind, because I see GD more often than Jugus, undoing much vandalism and useless edits. --  General5 7    talk    contribs    email   21:47, October 3, 2009 (UTC)
 * Jugus He is the best choice!-- Strider 6583 69398 1207534821 Marathon symbol.gif 22:01, October 3, 2009 (UTC)
 * Jugus A far better editor. Galacticdominator seems to have a problem with multiple edits, despite being warned twice by Subtank. Not exactly what you want to see in a HOTM.--Emblem 1.jpgRusty - 112 22:27, October 3, 2009 (UTC)
 * Nicmavr A great user who has been very helpful to the community. All his edits are actually good, and he is really friendly.--Shade  00:12, October 4, 2009 (UTC)

Comments
Jugus certainly got off to a good start. I suppose that's what happens: Someone sees a good user, votes for them, people see that vote, got no reason to vote for anyone else, they follow suit. Let's wait for someone to break the chain, make things interesting. -  Halo-343   ( Talk )   ( Contribs )   ( Edits )  21:43, October 3, 2009 (UTC)

yes, but i said the same ting last month, its to early to tell my friend -- Strider 6583 69398  22:04, October 3, 2009 (UTC)


 * Didn't I say that? :P --  General5 7    talk    contribs    email   22:06, October 3, 2009 (UTC)


 * You sort of said that, but in a lot more subtle and less blunt manner than myself. - Black Mesa.jpg Halo-343   ( Talk )   ( Contribs )   ( Edits )  22:39, October 3, 2009 (UTC)

Jugus had been active since June. Back then, DavidJCobb had not started his editing rampage yet. I personally have nominated him once already, but seeing that almost nobody knew about his existence -hence why nobody voted for him- I did not nominate him again. I'm happy Nicmavr noticed him at last. But what really concerns me is the nominators' real motives; why would one nominate Thunderstream last month (no offense)? I won't compare him to Jugus. I will just say that Jugus was far more active than him. As was Galacticdominator, sure! Thunderstream had just become active for a month or so, he needed some time to get on with things.

General, you say that Jugus' activity has decreased little bit; that's right. But you know what? When all you guys voted me in August and I won, I had done literally nothing. 'twas just because I had already been nominated once, in February, when I had around 50 edits a day, and in August some remembered about me again/I was one of the last veterans not to have it. You could have done the same thing with Jugus last month, with the only exception that he was still active then, while I wasn't when I won.

Halo-343: Jugus, as I said above, has been editing like hell for some months. He didn't "get off" now. See what I mean when I say "nobody knew about his existence"? - JEA13  [ iTalk  ] 08:03, October 4, 2009 (UTC)

I most certainly knew of his existence, like 60% of the images on the site have been uploaded by Jugus. He certainly deserves the award, but I'm waiting for things to get interesting before I consider voting. And can you get the award twice? Because Nicmavr has been HOTM before. Halo-343  ( Talk )   ( Contribs )   ( Edits )  09:23, October 4, 2009 (UTC)