Halopedia talk:Discord server

Archive 1

Manticore
Shouldn't Manticore also be listed in the Janitor operator section as well?Bllasae 03:50, 7 June 2008 (UTC)


 * No... -- Manticore   (talk)  07:31, 7 June 2008 (UTC)

Grievous797
Before you laugh your ass off at this request, hear me out. I, Grievous797, request low level OP privileges. Why? Because usually when I'm on, the channel is chaotic and when I attempt to warn an op, they're not online, or they're AFK. Now, you may say "Oh, you have a history of rule breaking you'll cause chaos!!11!1 OH TEH NOES". Look, I may be crazy when shenanigan time comes up, but I am reasonable about the rules. ;-) I am also a long time IRC member, and a regular. So, if you're worried about my activity, don't worry.	 Another reason I'm requesting Oppage, I try to tell someone to "stop breaking the rules, or I'll get the Op to kick you!" they ignore me and go on their merry way with causing chaos. By the time the OP that was away DOES kick the person, the damage has been done.	 Just a simple request.

--Grievous797

We really need another low level op that is on the channel often. When I am on the IRC channel and there aren't any ops the place is crazy. Spartan6 23:15, 9 June 2008 (UTC)

I completely support this, all of what has been said above is completely true. Grievous can be immature at times, but he knows when he is pushing the limits, and is extremely responsible most of the time on IRC. Sgt Vatz "My COM Channel""My Work" 23:20, 9 June 2008 (UTC)


 * I am just going to hurl my opinion on here. Grievous797 is great to talk to on the IRC, but he doesn't demonstrate the same level of maturity as the current ops. Though there are times when no Op is around and someone seriously needs to be kicked, but it happens to me too. Do I oppose Grievous797 as an op? No, but I am not sure if I support. I would be fine with him being allowed to be an op, but using his powers only when completely necessary and no other op responds to do the job. Sorry buddy. Pryo 'Zarkum  [[Image:Major-gr2.gif|19px]] My COMMy WorkMy Story 23:31, 9 June 2008 (UTC)


 * I'm thinking along the same lines as Pryo Zarkum. To be honest, if we need another low-level op, I think Pryo Zarkum (Ghost sangheili) would be a more suitable candidate. Thanks, General   simon   r  j  h 08:57, 10 June 2008 (UTC)


 * Ok, I need to clear up a few things. 1) If you're worried I may not be mature enough to handle it, that's a false worry. I go onto the IRC to have fun. I am NOT immature. I may act like it sometimes, but it's not my prime directive to be an immature person. I have fun on the irc, so I'm immature? I guess that means every single person that went onto the IRC and is an OP is not mature enough? CT has fun, he's an OP. Simon has fun, you're an OP. And, please, don't just blow me off and try to nominate someone else for the job I want on MY request. kthx Grievous797


 * As per what Simon said, I am surprised that any op thinks that I could be a low level op. But thanks. I'm not going to try to take it from Grievous797. Honestly, I'm not even sure if I want to be an op. But for now, I 75% support G797. Pryo 'Zarkum  [[Image:Major-gr2.gif|19px]] My COMMy WorkMy Story 19:43, 10 June 2008 (UTC)


 * I Agree with Ghost sangheili and G797 on this matter. Get 'em Grievous. Councilor Εw C 'Dnaudee Battle Net My Editcount 19:52, 10 June 2008 (UTC)


 * I also agree, due to the fact that Grievous797 is very active on the IRC and is on there very often when there aren't many Ops present. -- The   Adm  iral  [[Image:1212237429_Rearadmiralinsignia.jpg|25px]] 20:01, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Um....."but I am reasonable about the rules." - You constantly break rules, especially the ones we have on swearing and caps. For me, just........no.  Ha lo Du de 19:57, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Too immature, doesn't follow the rules half the time himself anyways, caps, swearing, flaming, ect.. So no.. Just no.  Church Re born 20:07, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
 * You know Im gonna stay out of this one, I dont feel I have a say in this and quite frankly im not an IRC regular so I dont really know what im talking about when it comes to people on IRC. Councilor Εw C 'Dnaudee Battle Net My Editcount 20:13, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Do I have to explain things again? I am reasonable about the more major rules and I don't use any major swears. Just "damn". You guys use it a lot too, it's not like the OPs are perfect. Also, please, PLEASE, put some type of reasoning into your comments. Instead of: "Immature". And also, try and take this seriously instead of laughing about it like a couple of you did. And you say I'm immature. Grievous797
 * Also I remember some little incident about you trying to blackmail KillerCRS after he banned you. Ring a bell much?  Church Re born 03:44, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Yeah, but that rumor was also false. H3 was talking about doing it, and I didn't want to. And stop bringing up this total BS in order to stop me from becoming an Op. Seriously. Grievous797
 * And the fact that I bring up something that you were 'discussing' about doing to an op is BS? And a rumour? I was in the freaking channel when I saw the logs being posted. Nice observation. And stop complaining every time someone brings up something similar that you did. I don't hate you or want to stop you from becoming an op, I just don't think you're ready. 9_9
 * May 25 16:34:06 	I'm afraid you two have become quite threatening to me.
 * May 25 16:34:14 	oh not his
 * May 25 16:34:17 	...
 * May 25 16:34:19 <Halo_3|Halo3>	this*
 * May 25 16:34:23 <Grievous797>	Jesus
 * May 25 16:34:23 <KillerCRS>	What with, the conspiracy to blackmail dealie that's been going on
 * May 25 16:34:26 <Grievous797>	...
 * May 25 16:34:26 <Grievous797>	H3...
 * May 25 16:34:32 <Grievous797>	I told you I didn't want to blackmail...
 * May 25 16:34:35 <KillerCRS>	<Halo_3> but i think Grievous797 that we should just keep logging and one day we can bury him with his wrong doings
 * May 25 16:34:35 <KillerCRS>	<Grievous797> But, he claims that I break major rule daily
 * May 25 16:34:38 <KillerCRS>	<Grievous797> If you want those logs saying that, I'll send them to you
 * May 25 16:34:38 <KillerCRS>	<Halo_3> lets just keep our logs and just make sure that we have them till the need arises
 * May 25 16:34:41 <KillerCRS>	<Halo_3> sould good?
 * May 25 16:34:41 <Grievous797>	The fuck...
 * May 25 16:34:41 <KillerCRS>	<Halo_3> sound*
 * May 25 16:34:47 <KillerCRS>	<Grievous797> right
 * May 25 16:34:47 <KillerCRS>	<Halo_3> k then
 * May 25 16:34:50 <KillerCRS>	<Grievous797> I don't want to blackmail him, but if the need arises...
 * It's not the fact that you didn't want to, it's the fact that you still went along with it until they found out what you were both talking about.  Church <font color="Red">Re <font color="Black">born 18:39, 11 June 2008 (UTC)


 * You break the rules (Even minor rules are to be followed, not just major ones), you've been involved in incidents like the one CR mentioned, you're displaying aggressive behaviour because people are opposing this request. People ARE putting reasons in their responses, but you seem to think that being *too immature* or *rulebreaking* isn't a good enough reason for someone to oppose you. Also, if we didn't take this seriously, we wouldn't even bother responding to this, or even so, we wouldn't even bothering putting a reason in our response.

And no, OPs/Admins aren't perfect. I think you'll find OPs that do break the rules are confronted by users, other OPs, or it is discussed with admins via PM. But even so, you have to expect opposition to any requests you make. I don't think you're ready for Operatorship just yet.  Ha <font color="Red">lo <font color="Black">Du <font color="Red">de 14:58, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Ok. Rule breaking is a good reason, it's just the "immaturity" part about it is a personal opinion. I understand what you're saying. Grievous797

Just commenting here; expectations of a unemotional, un-human operator, who will stick to the rules 100% of the time appear ,in my humble opinion, to be unrealistic. I feel it would be safe to say the every single op has broken the rules at one point or another (Though I personally feel this is partly because of the inane nature of the rules, but that would be going off-topic), and I've seen ops do way worse stuff and be more immature (not naming names) then Grievous has.

When I see Grievous, I do not see a hateful or spiteful person. I see someone who is passionate about this, and someone who honestly cares about the well-being of the IRC chat. Tesfan 14:55, 11 June 2008 (UTC)


 * I don't see a hateful or spiteful person either, I doubt anyone here does. But I still don't think he's ready for operatorship just yet.  Ha <font color="Red">lo <font color="Black">Du <font color="Red">de 15:03, 11 June 2008 (UTC)

Request for Low-level Op on IRC
I, Spirit-of-HALO, would like to request for Low-Op on #halopedia. Pertaining to Grievous's reason, I'm usually there when there is no one Opped. I would like to better the IRC channel by, at least, keeping order and helping other users. I have asked RelentlessRecusant on this term and said he would discuss with me. Thank-you for your time.

--Lt. Commander Mendez


 * You use IRC? O_o  Church <font color="Red">Re <font color="Black">born 20:08, 10 June 2008 (UTC)


 * He does, but only started to very recently. -- The   Adm  iral  [[Image:1212237429_Rearadmiralinsignia.jpg|25px]] 20:32, 10 June 2008 (UTC)


 * Oh. >_>  Church <font color="Red">Re <font color="Black">born 03:53, 11 June 2008 (UTC)


 * I will support this request, as S-o-H is perhaps one of the most civil individuals on the IRC. Pryo 'Zarkum  [[Image:Major-gr2.gif|19px]] My COMMy WorkMy Story 12:36, 11 June 2008 (UTC)