Talk:Unggoy Rebellion

Untitled

 * I don't think it was said anywhere. I've removed it. --Dragonclaws 09:52, 27 December 2006 (UTC)


 * I removed the FactOrFiction template and added the FactOrFictionResolved template here.--RotBrandon 06:46, 9 January 2007 (UTC)


 * What is the source of the following statement: DATE: Age of Doubt? I haven,t read the novels more than once, I can be wrong. But PLEASE, Cite the sources! Troubleshooter 14:10, 24 March 2007 (UTC)

It's possible that the Arbiter would not have been needed to fight the grunts.That (dependinding on the reason the grunts rebeeled)may have been used for fear. Because in halo 2 grunts think of the arbiter as a god.or on the other hand it may be much more probible that the grunt rebellion arbiter just 1.whipped their 4ft asses. 2 painted the walls with grunt blood(nothing like new paint(:.
 * They said an arbiter was needed, I would trust the Prophets on this issue. -- ED ( talk )(shockfront) 19:31, 4 April 2007 (UTC)


 * I just read a bit that said the Unggoy managed to kill an Arbiter before the conflict ended. Is this true, is that accurate? I was under the impression only one Arbiter served during the conflict and that was the Arbiter who ultimately won the war.262VigilantGuardian (talk) 12:21, 2 December 2014 (EST)

irony
I think that it is ironic that we don't know whether it was in the age of Doubt or not! 24.34.59.220 18:34, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Heh yeah, that is funny. -- ED ( talk )(gaming) 18:41, 20 June 2007 (UTC)

Hmm, yes some what funny.--''' UoH. COL. "Running   Riot"   Ryan  File:Sm Sniper Rifle.gif]]  BAM' '' 23:04, 20 June 2007 (UTC)

They could have just glassed the planted, but that would have destroyed all grunts. Which they saw as great cannin fodder.