Talk:Main Page

Note: ''This page is Halopedia's community center. It's a forum to ask questions and propose projects. For general site or community discussion, see the Halopedia Forums instead.''

Ads being covered on the Main Page
On smaller resolutions the current version of the main page table covers the ads, due to the poll box and the featured image being in two side-by-side tables. This is a bad thing (tm). Some suggestions for making the table more dynamic:
 * Don't use a globally wrapping table, a div would be contstrained (in most browsers) by the content div.
 * Split the columns a bit more into their own separate tables. A table looks nice, but doesn't allow content to find its natural parting.
 * Try to align inflexible content, such as the poll and the image. This would allow the opposing column, in extremely small browsers or resolutions, to squeeze to the width of the widest word (worst case).

--Splarka (talk) 05:01, 12 February 2007 (UTC)


 * Um, This is/was specific to the main page which is why I used this page. --Splarka (talk) 01:33, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
 * We can just remove it. The voting template will be brought down soon anyway, and it can be put back later. -ED 22:19, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

Question About Userboxes
Are we allowed to use userboxes from other wikis on our user pages?--Ketchup 01:46, 13 February 2007 (UTC)


 * They are free by definition, but they will most probably not work, as the code is stored on their Wiki's server, not ours. You could create the userbox to use on Halopedia, but it's best to do so on a subpage of your userpage if it's not related to Halo. --  Manticore  [[Image:Fleet Admiral.jpg|25px]] TalkundefinedCSV 02:59, 13 February 2007 (UTC)

Can we create our own custom userboxes? if so then how? -Spartan G-23

Halopedia Presentation

 * Do you think we can change the presentation of the Halopedia Main Page, it seems to have bits of information placed everywhere and doesn't look that great compared to other wikia's such as Wookiepedia. Could we also perhaps consider changing the font.

-Exodus 117

"Auto-ranking" Spartans
OK I'm really frustrated by this. Nearly every Spartan page whose rank has not been specifically mentioned is listed as a Petty Officer Second Class. Yes, I know all the SPARTAN-IIs were promoted to this rank upon "graduation", but that doesn't mean that was the same for every SPARTAN-III (I know some have been mentioned as PO2's though). It definitely doesn't make sense that Gamma Company SPARTAN-IIIs (who are still in training!) are listed as PO2. They haven't "graduated" yet!!! I think we need to make a page to list references for Spartan characters' ranks, and then list the others without references as unknown. Does anyone agree with me on this? Is anyone else irritated? --  Manticore  TalkundefinedCSV 13:07, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Gamma company graduated. That is why they left Onyx. Those that remained there were just competing for top team. -ED 20:13, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Ohh yeah! Well now I just sound kinda crazy. But if you check out SPARTAN-G099 you'll see a reference to him being called Private. Anyways it wasn't just Gamma Company. --  Manticore  [[Image:Fleet Admiral.jpg|25px]] TalkundefinedCSV 02:57, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
 * They did graduate, but no reference was made to them graduating to the rank of PO2, as with the SPARTAN-IIs. Theres no reference to any other classes of Spartans graduating to this rank either (even if SPARTAN-IIIs hold the rank, they may have been promoted to it following years of service). --  Manticore  [[Image:Fleet Admiral.jpg|25px]] TalkundefinedCSV 07:21, 27 February 2007 (UTC)

Regarding DYK...
I don't really like having the big long list there... I'd rather it just displays one random thing from a list, sorta like this, and then anyone can add something to the list, and it'll just display one random thing from the entire list. Whaddya think?  guesty - persony - thingy  I too am an AI... my owner's name is Supreme Honcho. 04:24, 17 February 2007 (UTC)


 * Yeah, that makes sense. --Dragonclaws(talk) 04:38, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Agreed. -ED 20:14, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
 * GPT, that Idea is amazing. In fact, I am going to impliment it right now. -ED 02:20, 20 February 2007 (UTC)


 * Yeah that's a good idea, but it should have 4 items, not 2. With 2 it looks bare, and it also is unbalanced on the Main Page. --  Manticore  [[Image:Fleet Admiral.jpg|25px]] TalkundefinedCSV 03:07, 20 February 2007 (UTC)

wikipedia
is this site part of the wikimedia foundation?--Socialist 13:49, 23 February 2007 (UTC)


 * No, it isn't. Please see Wikimedia for details of how Wikia and Wikimedia are different. Angela talk 14:30, 23 February 2007 (UTC)

Improvement Drive?
When I visited the page for the selection of the next improvement drive, I noticed that it is VERY unorganized. Personally I think that we should set it up like the featured article and stuff, with the nice, organized voting. That way we will be able to tell fairly which improvement drive is next. Also we should have a page that stating everything that needs to be accomplished before a section is considered good, and you can check off what has been finished. I think that will make our improvement drives more effective. Whad does everybody else think? Raging Phantom 19:13, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
 * There's never really been a lot of demand for the drive, its sort of fallen my the wayside lately. If you would like to imprive it, feel free. -ED 18:56, 3 March 2007 (UTC)

I have changed the voting page. Please note that I erased all nominations from before 2007, so if you had an idea before 2007 and want to have it nominated, you will have to do it again. sha dow in the pri sm 19:24, 4 March 2007 (UTC)

Ranking
Do you guys know how featured articles have a Legendary picture in the very top-right corner? Why not expand that, where stubs gets an Easy symbol, good articles get a Normal image, and great articles get a Heroic image? Respect them Grunts, Mouse Squeak to me. The mouse's work.
 * We would have to make some pretty extensive criteria for that. Right now, the symbol just represents FA status, just like the master chief helmet in the corner of admin's unserpages represent admin status. -ED 01:34, 3 March 2007 (UTC)

If anyone wants to do it, I have an idea for how that might be structured. --  Manticore  TalkundefinedCSV 00:08, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Featured articles - Legendary icon
 * Nominated to be featured articles - Heroic
 * Stubs - Easy
 * Not sure what Normal would be for, it'd be stupid to have it on every other page.

IDEA
I just had the best idea in the jole wiki of halo!! HAloepedia could have 3 different political parties kinda. Each admit would be kinda in charge. it might be the differnt friend groups maybe or somthing. like the one id be in would have Caboose, climax, digipatd, josh-29, Terror, Forerunner, maybe rot and more. we'd have dragonclaws as our admit repersentive maybe. and we have a vote every month or 3 or something. That would be really cool and would bring users together. It would be great. maybe for the fan art thing. the 3 admits and one elected person from each there parties would have a set on in it. or something. It could be used for alot. we could have more userboxs more new users would feel involed and alot of other stuff. it would defenitly bring a new kinda order to halopedia that no other wiki's have ever known! What do you all think?-- Lieutenant   Colonel   ryan  n  green  day 19:20, 2 March 2007 (UTC)


 * This is a great idea, instead of have one person controlling everything, we could have 3 parties that debate and discuss things about Halopedia.-- Joshua 029 19:46, 2 March 2007 (UTC)


 * It sounds kind of weird to make it into a republic when this sort of communist system works already. Frankly, it sounds better suited to a MUD than a wiki. -- Dragonc laws ( talk ) 20:45, 3 March 2007 (UTC)


 * I have no idea what the purpose of the three parties would be from that description. I don't think we need to start a whole new project merely so there can be a userbox put on people's pages either. --  Manticore  [[Image:Fleet Admiral.jpg|25px]] TalkundefinedCSV 00:11, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Isnt' this what the Covenant of Halopedia is? -- Esemono 01:41, 4 March 2007 (UTC)

Esemono is correct. This is the Covenant of Halopedia. It is a very intriguing idea, but I don't think it would work in practical terms. =D Cheers, Gho st I nsi de the M ach ine ''(Whisper through the Storm ) (My Journeys ) (<font color="#808080">Omens ) 14:30, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Plus, Halopedia still "officially" has at least four admins. If Seethroo ever comes back, he will get his status back, too. -ED 01:52, 5 March 2007 (UTC)