User talk:Spartacus/Archive

'Please do not post messages here, as they will likely go unnoticed. Please post messages on my actual talk page'.

Welcome, to Halopedia, the definitive source for Halo information!

Please read our introduction, where you'll find out what this site is and what we're trying to accomplish.


 * Need help? Visit our help section where you can find how to add images and get assistance with editing.


 * Sign your edits! We only sign our edits when posting on Talk pages; to do this, just put the following code after your post: -- ~ . Then, when you press the "Save Page" button, Halopedia will replace the code with your username and the time and date you posted! For more information on how to customize your signature visit our help page.

Interested in chatting with fellow users? Then check out our IRC Channel.

You nominated my article for deletion.
Why? It's about a glitch. There are plenty of more glitches on this wiki, did I do something wrong with mine? Sgt. Dynamo Jet 21:42, 7 March 2011 (EST)
 * Can provide like a video of it?-Forgive My English 21:46, 7 March 2011 (EST)

This is the same guy by the way let's talk about it on the actual talk page. Sgt. Dynamo Jet 21:51, 7 March 2011 (EST)

Signature
I think you need to fix your signature, as it links back to the page you're on instead of your userpage. -- Am I a Lion, or a Lamb? Or a Boy?  Saint o r Sinner? The Lost Books 17:06, 18 March 2011 (EDT)


 * its like because i use the Use Wiki Userpage button onForgive My English 17:11, 18 March 2011 (EDT)

Opinions
where can i put my options if i cant put it on disscuion pages butthead4


 * Not really anywhereForgive My English 00:58, 25 March 2011 (EDT)

Maturity
Can you be mature about your edits? Maybe even not screaming in caps when someone doesn't agree with you?-- Shade  21:35, 31 March 2011 (EDT)


 * I just wanted you to notice that you made an incorrect edit Caps is easy to notice Forgive My English TALK TO ME BABY 21:44, 31 March 2011 (EDT)
 * Just don't use caps again. When someone uses caps, they assume the user is yelling and being an idiot (not saying you are one), where you will usually get bad attention or end up ignored.-- Shade  21:47, 31 March 2011 (EDT)

Mate, I understand you're trying to help the Wiki and all, but you don't control pages :)

I trust the person who put the edit there, and I have a question: Why is it that when I make an edit, you appear to be watching, waiting for it?-- Shade  13:41, 25 May 2011 (EDT)

Edit Warring
-- Shade  13:51, 25 May 2011 (EDT)
 * 1) I wasn't ACCUSING you, I was ASKING you why you appear to be watching my edits.
 * 2) How was that user's edit "bad" or "not making sense"?
 * 3) He is not my superior, and neither am I his.
 * 4) I am not edit-warring, I am adding back info that people remove just because they either want points, do it "for teh lulz", or simply don't want to bother researching it, in this case, the SPARTAN dude who removed those multiple pieces of info and the minor info at the top of the page.

Just got your other reply. No, it's not harassment. Admins, normal users, and Rollbacks call people many names worse than "little kid", so "little kid" I shall say.-- Shade  13:52, 25 May 2011 (EDT)


 * I sure hate edit conflicts oh well I let you keep your edit happy now? And I don't feel like arguing all day. "A Penny saved is a Penny earned" 14:01, 25 May 2011 (EDT)


 * I've been gone for a few hours, but I'm sure you guys are talking about Wilc0. Those edits were legitimate, albeit minor. Reverting his edits gave you points, which may appear to suggest that you are point-whoring.--  Fore  run  ner '' 19:29, 25 May 2011 (EDT)
 * Not talking about Wilc0. I was referring to some theory edits that some SPARTAN guy removed... then after they were restored, it was about 10 minutes until they were removed and the page was protected :(.-- Shade  19:40, 25 May 2011 (EDT)
 * I understand but I'm not trying to point whore, I really don't care much for points "A Penny saved is a Penny earned" 19:39, 25 May 2011 (EDT)


 * Ah - just checking. :) --  Fore  run  ner '' 20:15, 25 May 2011 (EDT)

That's good to know *hides spanking fish*-- Shade  14:02, 25 May 2011 (EDT)

Start=

You need to aggressive up i dont need to calm down.

Help
Someone please get this user off my back, hes been stalking my high-quality edits even where they dont need to be reverted, ie if i say leeds is in the north of england which it IS because I was born in Northern England so i know these things. Dont say its unneeded detail because otherwise portsmouth wouldnt have been put as being on the south coast of england. Only saying.

Your edits were in bad grammar and that's why i undid them. Sign you comments!!! "A Penny saved is a Penny earned" 09:57, 5 June 2011 (EDT)


 * Actually, I think CookieMonstersayhello's edits are grammatically correct, as opposed to you... I mean, you past signature was "Forgive my English" and on this talk page, your posts lack in punctuation and sentence fluency... Well, "I got better" (Monty Python reference), but still, I think Cookie's edits are fine as they are. He is a native British, and you are an American. If you're saying that Halo is from an American company, so Halopedia should be using American English, then you are implying that Bungie.net forums should also be in American English. Furthermore, the existence of Halo International would be unnecessary. I'm trying to resolve a conflict here, but if I'm failing at it, please "PARDON MY DUST" and I will continue to be a janitor. — S331 Bubbleshieldhud.svg (Talk • Contributions) 11:25, 5 June 2011 (EDT)

Yo, Spartan331 as much as im slightly annoyed you called me "British" (though that is simply a silly patriotism thing), I must apart from that thank you first of all: for having the initiative to step in and try and break up the fight. Secondly, understanding where im coming from and appreciating that my edits were fine (I cant really say nought about Halofan1234's edits other than he shouldnt have reverted them). Thirdly, letting me know how to archive my talk page, thanks. Im serious not trolling btw.

As for YOU, Halofan1234 stop reverting my english-related edits or YOU will be sorry, imbecile no im only joking about the imbecile bit haha lol. --CookieMonstersayshello 11:58, 5 June 2011 (EDT)


 * S331 that's not what I'm implying Halopedia rules specifically say we use American English. As for you cookie don't threaten me on my own talk page I have the backing of an admin on this. "A Penny saved is a Penny earned" 15:10, 5 June 2011 (EDT)

Just cause an administrator may back you up, doesnt mean you are right. --CookieMonstersayshello 15:18, 5 June 2011 (EDT)


 * To the both of you: CALM DOWN AND SHUT UP. Stop arguing, stop bickering towards each other, settle your differences like the mature young adults I hope both of you are. Any more from the both of you, and you'll get a three-day, all expenses paid suspension.


 * Sorry Tony I wasn't trying to cause an argument, but I do have one question don't we use American English on Halopedia? "A Penny saved is a Penny earned" 16:19, 5 June 2011 (EDT)


 * I don't recall it being written though it is generally-agreed by the community, including most Commonwealth speakers.--  Fore  run  ner '' 16:22, 5 June 2011 (EDT)


 * Alright thanks! "A Penny saved is a Penny earned" 16:27, 5 June 2011 (EDT)

And how is saying north of england, NOT american english, I dont understand --CookieMonstersayshello 16:36, 5 June 2011 (EDT)
 * In America we say northern England as opposed to saying in the north of England. "A Penny saved is a Penny earned" 16:38, 5 June 2011 (EDT)

Okay, thanks now that I know, I can say northern england then. Geez wasnt hard was it. --CookieMonstersayshello 16:58, 5 June 2011 (EDT)

halo 3 campaign
send me a friend request and what time do you want to play?butthead4 How about now? "A Penny saved is a Penny earned" 21:25, 9 June 2011 (EDT)

do you happen to have the invasion map saucered?butthead4

I do not right now. "A Penny saved is a Penny earned" 00:30, 15 June 2011 (EDT)

halo 3
when do you want to finish it with me butthead4 Sometime remember to sign your comments with ~ "A Penny saved is a Penny earned" 23:14, 19 June 2011 (EDT)

Stalking my edits again and being biased in favour of the humans
I swear to god if you stalk my edits again, I will report you to the administrators do you want history to repeat itself (and you know EXACTLY what I mean)? Because I sure as hell dont. So, please understand that the covenant do use tactics and strategy like the UNSC (if not more so) especially Elites, Jackals and Brutes, they do have a mind you know I mean 1 single Major Elite could take on 4 marines and still win so thats saying something.
 * Buddy you do realize that I'm not the only one undoing your edits. You were blocked for vandalism so I'd think they would be on my side. Cheers! PRESIDENT1234 12:11, 7 July 2011 (EDT)
 * You also should realize that None of your recent edits were undone by me. Seriously take it up with the people who undo your edits. PRESIDENT1234 12:17, 7 July 2011 (EDT)


 * You can't compare Covenant and UNSC battle tactics and say that one is better - they are too different; it's like saying that Bungie is better at making games than Ensemble, despite your most comparisons being FPS and RPG games. The Covenant military tactic is based on brute force and numbers - they send out Unggoy to their deaths to slow down the enemy. The Sangheili spend their time either shooting in the open or punching their enemies - that's nothing like the UNSC's tactics which involve shooting from behind walls and guerilla warfare strategies. Both the UNSC and Covenant are experienced warriers, but the Covenant, despite campaign successes, cannot be called "tacticians". That word better suits militaries that use strategy to limit casualties, not the Stalin method of throwing in as many as it takes to make it go away.--  Fore  run  ner '' 12:28, 7 July 2011 (EDT)

So Fore, you saying even the Elites arent tacticians you told a different story to 90. MAKE UP YOUR MIND, either the elites are good tacticians or they arent. The humans spray fire and link it thats all THEY do. --CookieMonstersayshello 13:17, 7 July 2011 (EDT)


 * The Sangheili are smart - they just don't see the need in using tactics to defeat the enemy. Remember that they have little regard for personal-safety, thereby considering the majority of warfare strategies as unnecessary. Furthermore take note that they have shielding and strong armour plated uniforms - do you think there's a point in sneaking around if you'd consider yourself unbeatable? Cookiemonster, although the Jiralhanae can easily defeat humans in battle, they are not tacticians - they follow the standard Covenant military strategy of attacking head-on - they're only effective because they're naturally stronger than humans. So in conclusion: the Jiralhanae use their strength and the Sangheili don't see the point in it. However, also note that winning a battle is not automatically a tactical/strategic victory. Were the Sangheili to use the UNSC's more covert strategies like the SPARTANS (which active camoflague users use to a limited extent), then their Army wouldn't suffer such heavy losses.--  Fore  run  ner '' 13:36, 7 July 2011 (EDT)

As for you HaloFan1234 youve been worse, YOU caused the argument, I have not been blocked for vandalism cause im still editing now. Stop golding up UNSC tactics or the covenant will continue to be golded up by me, who plays halo 1,2 and 3 hours on end just to watch the moments where unsc and covenant fight. The elites and brutes are very superior fighters to the humans considering the humans have spartans on there side, YOUR SAYING ELITES arent as smart, Elites arent as smart, ELITES ARENT AS SMART!? Does not compute. Does not compute. "Dalek voice" DOES- NOT- COMPUTE --CookieMonstersayshello 13:21, 7 July 2011 (EDT)

I am not trolling, I am mad as hell with you tho Halofan1234. --CookieMonstersayshello 13:23, 7 July 2011 (EDT) Do me a favour fore, and shut him up please.

I think you should give the Talk: Covenant Empire military section a look, i think youll find it very interesting --CookieMonstersayshello 13:30, 7 July 2011 (EDT)
 * Wow if you're really irritated about this then get the heck off and find something else to do! And look at the block log,

15:55, 11 June 2011 CommanderTony (Talk | contribs) blocked CookieMonstersayshello (Talk | contribs) with an expiry time of 2 weeks (account creation disabled, e-mail blocked) ‎ (Vandalism) Yeah I think you were blocked for vandalism...PRESIDENT1234 14:26, 7 July 2011 (EDT)

777
Woah! I just realized that according to my statistics that I have 777 mainspace edits!!! And no I won't add it to 7 article. PRESIDENT1234 20:23, 7 July 2011 (EDT)

Why?
Why did you undo the edit i made on the BOB article?

Thanks. Siul S-249 17:59, 8 August 2011 (EDT)
 * You were undoing a rollbacked edit and removing information without giving a reason.--ハローファン (H1234-NET) 18:04, 8 August 2011 (EDT)
 * Well, in that case, someone did undo my edit before, if he gave a reason (and i dont know where it is displayed) why did that user undo my edit before? Siul S-249 18:08, 8 August 2011 (EDT)
 * He was probably thinking the same as me. Do you have a reason for removing it?--ハローファン (H1234-NET) 18:13, 8 August 2011 (EDT)
 * Of course, i mentioned the reason at the discussion section.Siul S-249 18:17, 8 August 2011 (EDT)
 * Well do you have a source that states that?--ハローファン (H1234-NET) 18:24, 8 August 2011 (EDT)
 * http://www.bungie.net/Forums/posts.aspx?postID=59238815&viewreplies=true&postRepeater1-p=162 post by Paul Torrance. Also, i was on a private group called New Reach Secrets, we discussed about that i got the banshee BOB and a golden BOB at the same time one day before the challenge. Siul S-249 18:35, 8 August 2011 (EDT)
 * Alright thanks, I'll revert my revision. Could you also post this to the talk page?--ハローファン (H1234-NET) 19:19, 8 August 2011 (EDT)
 * Sure, one sec. Thanks for you time BTW.Siul S-249 19:22, 8 August 2011 (EDT)
 * Any time.--ハローファン (H1234-NET) 19:23, 8 August 2011 (EDT)

Signature
Why hello there! 32| Regarding my signature, I used to be SPARTAN-A110 on the site. Ask SPARTAN-118, CommanderTony and Subtank. Regards, Nanosoldier.


 * No worries. I've forgotten my old account password, judging by the last time I edited on my old account, I have no clue anymore. —Nanosoldier

"Poorly Written"
I would just like to note that "poorly written" isn't a good reason why we undo people's edit. It will be a good reason if we have something else, like "redundant", which is something you did. When someone contributes something that is poorly written, we help them by rewording it. I know I undid someone's edit because it was "poorly written" some time ago. Just telling you. <:) — S331 (When I played Halo: CE, we didn't have any fancy-shmancy armor abilities...) 01:11, 2 September 2011 (EDT)
 * And what edit are you talking about?--ハローファン (H1234-NET) 20:35, 3 September 2011 (EDT)

Was it this one? http://www.halopedian.com/index.php?title=Halo:_The_Fall_of_Reach&diff=943790&oldid=943633 --ハローファン (H1234-NET) 20:40, 3 September 2011 (EST)

UserWiki
Thank you! It's not done but I'm starting to figure it out! Ιι  Ηη   Ππ  16:18, 30 October 2011 (EDT)
 * Need any more help just let me know.-- Lt. Commander  光环的家伙  Talk ( Contribs ) ( Edits ) 18:38, 30 October 2011 (EDT)
 * Will do! and thank you, you too! Ιι   Ηη   Ππ  18:40, 30 October 2011 (EDT)
 * Your welcome.-- Lt. Commander  光环的家伙1234   Talk  ( Contribs ) ( Edits ) 18:44, 30 October 2011 (EDT)

User talk
Thanks for letting me know about my user talk! PuRe WoZZy UserWiki
 * Your welcome.-- Lt. Commander  光环的家伙1234   Talk  ( Contribs ) ( Edits ) 21:43, 31 October 2011 (EDT)

EDT)

Question about making a new article
Hi there! Since you helped me before i was wondering if you could tell me if i can create an article similar to the campaign levels walkthrough guides, but instead, i want to make it related to the BOBs. This because the current article its just about where they are, and has no specific strategies to kill them.

If it can be done i have several videos of all of them (except for 2) to provide sources. Or if it can be done inside the same BOB article would be nice too.

Thanks!Siul S-249 16:02, 1 November 2011 (EDT)
 * I would ask an administrator about this. It seems like a good idea though. A list of admins can be found | here. Try asking Forerunner, he's online a lot.-- Lt. Commander  光环的家伙1234   Talk  ( Contribs ) ( Edits ) 19:13, 1 November 2011 (EDT)
 * I will do it right now, thanks! Siul S-249 19:53, 1 November 2011 (EDT)
 * Uh, then i use the link i get an error, it says "The requested page title was invalid, empty, or an incorrectly linked inter-language or inter-wiki title. It may contain one or more characters which cannot be used in titles."Siul S-249 19:55, 1 November 2011 (EDT)
 * Uh sorry for stalking, but Halopedia:Administrators seems to be a more accurate page. And you can name the page you suggested "BOB/Gameplay", so you can place the template " " on the BOB's article trivia section. See Sangheili article's Trivia section for reference.— S331  Bubbleshieldhud.svg(Tank beats Everything!) 20:33, 1 November 2011 (EDT)
 * Well hello S331, I was trying to link to Special:Userlist/sysop lol, but I phailed.-- Lt. Commander  光环的家伙1234   Talk  ( Contribs ) ( Edits ) 22:22, 1 November 2011 (EDT)
 * Uh, well, its not good that the admin never said anything when i asked... What do you suggest i should do? Siul S-249 16:12, 5 January 2012 (EST)
 * You could probably make the page. If you do, name it "BOB/Gameplay". Then you can add the " " to the trivia section of the BOB article.--Pipboy300.jpg  Commander Spartacus  ~  ŤДŁĶ  ~  ĈʘŃŤṜǏΒŨŤǏʘŃŞ  ~  ĚṂДǏŁ  16:18, 5 January 2012 (EST)

Bullet in the barrel of your best guy's gun
Well then, if Forerunner insists on it, alright, but I say that it's better to keep them. It helps keep an overall standard, and when there's only a single trivia point it causes the section to look like it's solely about that sentence rather than a miscellaneous section. Additionally, a new user might come along and not realize that one has to add a bullet to add a new trivia bit. Sure, it could be fixed ourselves, but it's best to minimize the risk of confusion to begin with. Overall it helps maintain a constant page standard. Tuckerscreator (stalk ) 15:20, 12 November 2011 (EST)
 * Yeah that sounds good.-- Lt. Commander  光环的家伙1234   Talk  ( Contribs ) ( Edits ) 16:32, 12 November 2011 (EST)
 * ^LOL^ section title.-- Lt. Commander  光环的家伙1234   Talk  ( Contribs ) ( Edits ) 16:44, 12 November 2011 (EST)


 * "Yeah that sounds good." I can't tell if that means you agree or disagree with me on whether the bullet points should be returned? Tuckerscreator (stalk ) 17:58, 12 November 2011 (EST)
 * I agree with your point, but I think they should stay off for now.-- Lt. Commander  光环的家伙1234   Talk  ( Contribs ) ( Edits ) 19:47, 12 November 2011 (EST)

Mona Lisa
I placed some points on the talk page. I think we've seen the whole "between Halos 1 and 2" concept before... it turns out that it means "Between the end of Halo: Combat Evolved and the start of part 2 of Halo 2" (Remember that there is a big gap between "Metropolis" and "Delta Halo") Halo: Uprising "bridges the gap", despite the fact that it occurs before the Halo 2 ending. The whole thing is awkward as hell.--  Fore  run  ner '' 15:47, 25 November 2011 (EST)


 * Just saw it. Though I can actually agree with both parts of the argument. Do you think there's any way we could get clarification on this from 343 or something?-- Commander  光环的家伙1234   Talk  ( Contribs ) ( Edits ) 15:52, 25 November 2011 (EST)


 * We used to send letters (read: emails) to end disputes; perhaps we could do it, again. My guess is that there was some oversight by the authors of The Mona Lisa on the part of the escapades of High Charity's defence fleet. I guess, if either viewpoint can be supported, we could, for the time being, note-out the "Battle of Earth" positioning and instead have something like Usually we just work-around these things. For example, the re-print of Halo: The Flood shows the Ascendant Justice being at Installation 04 when the Pillar of Autumn arrived; the original and reprint versions of First Strike instead say that it was part of a detatchment sent by High Charity to investigate. We concluded that the Covenant had reached Installation 04 some time before the Autumn's arrival and that High Charity had sent a scout group ahead of it while it made its approach. --  Fore  run  ner '' 16:01, 25 November 2011 (EST)
 * Alright that sounds good.-- Commander  光环的家伙1234   Talk  ( Contribs ) ( Edits ) 17:05, 25 November 2011 (EST)

RE: User Page
Thanks! I'm so flattered. XD I wanted to use the Forge World concept art as a background, but I can't find any way to do it, so I just made a Portal 2 reference instead. — S331 (COM • Mission Log • Profile) 01:49, 14 December 2011 (EST)
 * Yeah I noticed those references...they're really good.-- Commander   Spartacus  ( Tenth Roman   Battalion ) 01:50, 14 December 2011 (EST)

Double redirects
Could you please fix your former userpages so that it doesn't create a double redirect? :) 07:41, 19 December 2011 (EST)
 * Sure thing. :) -- Commander   Spartacus  ( Tenth Roman   Battalion ) 21:39, 20 December 2011 (EST)
 * I fixed one of them, but I can't edit the other one as it seems to be protected.-- Commander   Spartacus  ( Tenth Roman   Battalion ) 21:41, 20 December 2011 (EST)
 * Odd... no protection has been logged on both pages. I suggest pester Nicmavr. :P — subtank  07:00, 21 December 2011 (EST)
 * I asked him. Must be some sort of glitch.-- Commander   Spartacus  ( Tenth Roman   Battalion ) 11:20, 21 December 2011 (EST)
 * Fixed, although weird since no protection was made. Oh well. - Major.png Nìcmávr  ( Tálk  ) 12:14, 21 December 2011 (EST)
 * Thanks.-- Commander   Spartacus  ( Tenth Roman   Battalion ) 12:17, 21 December 2011 (EST)

The Ark's Destruction
Commander Spartacus, I reply to your statement to say that I do not understand how it is possible for a premature firing of halo ring could completely destroy a megastructure such as the Ark which is several times larger than a halo ring. I would like you to ask these questions to prove my point: 1. The Ark is larger than the Earth and is larger than some gas giants in our own solar system. If it is true that the premature firing of Installation 04B did destroy the Ark, would that make it true that a premature firing of a incomplete Halo in general would be capable of destroying whole planets or objects of the Arks magnitude in size 2. A halo's pulse in designed to fire a blast of supermassive neutrinos that are tuned to possess a harmonic frequency that would destroy the nervous system of any macroscopic animal. How would a blast such as this be capable of destroying a entire megastructure over 100,000 km in diameter. 3. Cortana's statement that the ring "did a number on the Ark" is a phrase that indicates that the Ark was damaged, not destroyed 4. 343 Guilty Spark statement may obviously prove your point, however, given the state he was at the time and the fact of the sudden realization his installation was about to be destroyed again, he may have said it to convince Sargent Johnson to not place the index and start the firing sequence. 5. During the short film Origins from Halo Legends, a part of it shows briefly Installation 00. If one looks carefully when paused, they may see the surface charred and with what appears to be firestorms spreading along its arms. This may indicate that the Ark was moderately damaged, but not destroyed. If fates could remain unknown or uncertain, however, there is nothing that actually show the Ark remains or it being destroyed nor does anything specifically show the Ark damaged but intact. Well this is my reply to your statement, I stand for what I think is true as so do you. I will not change anymore pages, unless this evidence show that the Ark did survive. Thank you P.S. I am the person who wishes to know why the Ark said to have been destroyed.
 * Here are your answers. I will start of with this. Four sources have confirmed that the firing of the incomplete ring destroyed the Ark. That is a fact.
 * 1.If the firing and destruction of the ring destroyed the Ark, it is reasonable to think it could destroy planetary objects at or near the same size.
 * 2.It was not the firing of the ring that destroyed the Ark, it was the ring shaking itself apart and the debris from it that destroyed the Ark.
 * 3.Most people interpret Cortana's statement as proof that the Ark was destroyed.
 * 4.Sergeant Johnson told Spark to deal with it. Spark killed him because he didn't want another one of his installations to be destroyed. He also did not want the Ark to be destroyed. He was in rampancy, but he still was enough normal to know what a firing of an unfinished ring would do if fired within close proximity to the Ark.
 * 5.We don't even know at what time the film of the Ark in origins is. For all we know, it could be before the ring fired. The fires on the surface have an easy explanation: They could simply be the remains of the ships from the Prophet of Truth's fleet.
 * I finally leave you with the fact that there is no source that states the Ark was not destroyed, while we have many sources that state the Ark was destroyed. Furthermore, the reasons your edits were reverted was because they contradicted previously established canon. For all we knew, you were inserting false information, which is a bannable offense. I am glad that you decided to respond to me, but please do not continue to add to the relevant articles that the Ark was only damaged, when we have so many sources statiing otherwise. Also sign your name on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ) and also avoid making multiple edits in an article. Please use the Preview feature before saving. Thanks.--Pipboy300.jpg Commander Spartacus  ~  ŤДŁĶ  ~  ĈʘŃŤṜǏΒŨŤǏʘŃŞ  ~  ĚṂДǏŁ  00:38, 1 January 2012 (EST)

Ark Destruction
Thank you for answering my questions. Now I know how the Ark was destroyed. I also did not mean to vandalize the article if that what it would be called. I just thought it was true when I thought about it for a while that the Ark most likely survived, but was severely damaged. Also if your wondering when the Ark is shown in the short movie Origin you must watch the whole second part. That is where I got the idea that the Ark most likely survived.
 * You're welcome. I watched Origins and saw that part and now I understand why you thought the Ark was only damaged. As I said earlier, it's likely that the stuff burning on the surface is the remnants of Truth's fleet.--Pipboy300.jpg Commander Spartacus  ~  ŤДŁĶ  ~  ĈʘŃŤṜǏΒŨŤǏʘŃŞ  ~  ĚṂДǏŁ  11:49, 2 January 2012 (EST)

Re: Multiple Edits
Sorry about that. I forgot some of the characters' names and plot details as I remembered what I had read and looked them up on the wiki as a went along. 21:26, 21 January 2012 (EST)