Talk:Andrew Del Rio

Page Picture
I think we should go back to the last one, the current one is at an odd angle with odd lighting, and for lack of a better term makes him look dumb.ArchedThunder 19:05, 26 September 2012 (EDT)
 * While I disagree entirely, your assesement of the screenshot fits perfectly with his personality in both The Thursday War and Halo 4.
 * I'm confused, are you saying he is dumb?ArchedThunder 19:12, 26 September 2012 (EDT)
 * Becoming a ship captain means you have some level of competency (unless you're CDR Miranda Keyes). I'm not saying that he's dumb either as all senior officers go through a myriad of training regimens, simply that he makes incredibly poor decisions as a commander of a cR hemorrhaging warship housing nearly 20,000 crew.
 * Um.... okay, like what? Anyways he also looks lifeless in that still shot being used.ArchedThunder 19:20, 26 September 2012 (EDT)
 * At the very least, in The Thursday War, it's established that Parangosky doesn't have too high an opinion of Del Rio and would have preferred Lasky as the ship commander (or something similar, been awhile since I've read the excerpt). On the other, I do admit to preferring the old image.--Hawki 19:25, 26 September 2012 (EDT)
 * I don't see where you get "lifeless." To me, I see a look of curiosity as well as contempt, disdain and lack of trust towards John-117 [seen in the full screenshot].
 * I don't see that, his expression and the lighting make him look like a lifeless dummy. It looks really bad.ArchedThunder 19:35, 26 September 2012 (EDT)
 * Not all mid-aged men can look like Brad Pitt. I suggest you look at the full-resolution image, which is nearly to scale if you zoom it in correctly, and stare at it for a good while, see if you have any thoughts that he's a "dummy" and lifeless. Otherwise, the image that is currently in the infobox is fine.
 * This has nothing to do with him looking handsome, it has to do with it being a bad picture.ArchedThunder 19:44, 26 September 2012 (EDT)
 * Yeah, I got that the first few times, and I'm saying that you don't know what you're talking about.
 * I have honestly no idea how you can look at that and not think it looks bad, one eye is squinted while the other isn't, he has a shadow cast over one eye, his head is cocked back in an awkward fashion and the lighting makes his skin look extremely fake. Besides this current picture is WAY to situational to be a page picture, the previous one was a more neutral expression. We shoud either use that one or this one. http://www.halopedia.org/File:Del_Rio_bodyshot.png ArchedThunder 19:53, 26 September 2012 (EDT)
 * I'm not saying its the best picture that we could have of him, only that its the best one we currently posses. Referring back to my "Brad Pitt" statement which you largely ignored, I was implying that not everyone has superior bone structure or a squad of lighting experts with them at all times. There's nothing wrong with a "situational" portrait, we've never enforced any such preference anyhoo, as long as it accurately portrays the personality and/or a key moment of the character. Seeing Del Rio have the aforementioned expression towards John is a great example of the sort of person he is and sets the tone for his biographical content in the article. As for your suggested image, you would trade a "dummy" expression with a properly lifeless, robotronic appearance? He's not in MJOLNIR and therefore has a face that can display emotion, why would you simplify a readers experience by introducing them with an image that tells them nothing about the man they are going to learn about?
 * (reset indent) I say keep it. It is as good as any other, in fact, probably even better. I mean, just look at all the Halo: Reach Noble Team infobox portraits! What's wrong with them? This seriously has to stop! --Xamikaze330 20:04, 26 September 2012 (EDT)Xamikaze330