Talk:Cruiser

Discrepancy
"Even though both major fleets possessed warships of such classifications, the tactical philosophies of the two species were different. The Covenant, while possessing many different cruiser classifications, used carriers as the powerhouses of their fleets. The UNSC, on the other hand, used cruisers as their heaviest warships."

This makes absolutely no sense, aren't a powerhouse and a "heaviest ship" almost the same thing? I'm not entirely sure what we're going for here... Steve2frag 00:34, 29 March 2009 (UTC)


 * The Covenant use Carriers as the powerhouses, not Cruisers like the UNSC. --  Administrator  Specops306  -  Qur'a 'Morhek   Honour Light Your Way!  01:25, 29 March 2009 (UTC)

Oh, okay. A subtle C-word difference. Thanks for clearing that up! Steve2frag 16:21, 29 March 2009 (UTC)

UNSC Cruisers Template
In the UNSC Cruisers Template for the Halcyon-class, Marathon-class and Valiant-class cruisers, they appear to have their own lead ships linked presumably as how UNSC frigates have had their own lead ships, but even then, the UNSC frigate lead ships had their sources cited, I find it an inappropriate misuse of linking if it doesn't have an official source cited. I'm only bringing up this concern for the possible correction or deletion of 57 linked edits that lead to pages that don't exist. Bronze98 (talk) 06:40, 29 January 2014 (EST)


 * It has been suggested by Stephen Loftus (username ScaleMaster117) that each cruisers are named after their lead ships. It should be noted that this is a confirmation from a third-party who was involved in the process of editing the H4 Visual Guide. — subtank   12:56, 29 January 2014 (EST)