Talk:Core of Requiem

I hesitated between this title and "Core (Requiem)". I'd be glad if you had any suggestion, because I feel the current title may not be the best one. (especially regarding the future image category) Imrane-117 (talk) 15:41, 16 February 2016 (EST)


 * Honestly "Core of Requiem" works, as it is a pretty descriptive title, similar to Covenant cruiser at Longhorn Valley. Though, I would be fine with "Core (Requiem)" as well. -- NightHammer (talk)(contribs) 18:11, 16 February 2016 (EST)
 * I'm fine with Core of Requiem. Sith Venator Mega Blastoise.gif ( Dank Memes ) 19:49, 16 February 2016 (EST)
 * Is there a reason it's its own article and not just something within the entry for Requiem itself? Is it just to keep the info compartmentalized? -ScaleMaster117 (talk) 20:46, 16 February 2016 (EST)
 * Core of Requiem is alright but at the same time "Requiem's Core" seems more concise.-- 23:12, 16 February 2016 (EST)
 * Core of Requiem sounds fine to me as I prefer avoiding brackets whenever possible. @ScaleMaster117: It's compartmentalization and because it allows for a more in-depth examination of the subject without making the Requiem article too bloated. Same reason we have articles for other locations on Requiem. --Jugus (Talk  | Contribs ) 23:18, 16 February 2016 (EST)