Talk:UNSC carrier

This artical needs more!

Armament
Cite armament. Cheers,  Relentless Recusant  16:06, 19 November 2006 (UTC)

Marathon-class vs Carrier
The cruiser in Battlegroup Stalingrad was never stated as a Marathon-class, if it were a Halcyon-class then it would only make sense that a modern carrier was the flagship. With that being said, at the Battle of Sigma Octanus the Leviathan (a Marathon-class) was the flagship despite there being carriers present. The simple definition of a carrier would make it less effective against Covenant capital ships as Longswords lack the capability to break through shields. It's highly unlikely a carrier is more powerful and in lesser abundance than a Marathon-class especially since prior to the fall of reach there were only 20 cruisers still active and it's stated explicitly that they are the most powerful vessels made by human hands.

i believe it was stated as a marathon but i will check J!MMY8806 09:58, 24 January 2007 (UTC)

i believe that the reason for all these diferent ships bieng made flagship, i believe the best explanation for this would be that the ship put in 'command' would have the highest ranking officer on, it is the only way to put all this together and make sense. J!MMY8806 22:19, 24 January 2007 (UTC)

Power
I think everyone is too obsessed with Which-Ship-Is-More-Powerful. i mean, look at the ships of today. each performs a different purpose. the Carrier in GoO had command because THAT'S WHAT THEY'RE FOR!! Carriers are lightly armed, but carry plenty of Fighters. they're not as POWERFUL as other ships, but they're more USEFUL. -SpecOps306

it doesnt state they are lightly armed, so we do not know J!MMY8806 10:00, 24 January 2007 (UTC)

About the cruiser bieng more powerful = if the UNSC ships that we do not know about are anything like the covenant in terms of the CCS battle cruiser bieng weaker than the Assualt carrier i belive this could be the same with the UNSC ships seen as though these are starships not little poxy things that float on water. J!MMY8806 22:19, 24 January 2007 (UTC)

But they perform the same role. look it up sometime, you'll be amazed what those "little poxy things that float on water" can do. they patrol space, like modern ships, they engage enemy units similar to todays navy (except for the whole movement-in-three-dimensions thing), and carry armaments that are being considered for naval warships these days. each type has a role: you wouldnt send a Carrier after a submarine, no more than you'd send a Frigate to launch airstrikes against somalia. -SpecOps306

well all that is obvious i know that but you have to take in fact these: kk thanks, J!MMY8806 12:41, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
 * we currently do not have interstellar travel and the ships of today are made to float on water not fly through space which is completely and utterly diffrent in almost every way so we can not state what we do not know about. (and the reason i refered to them as poxy little ships is because the ships in halo range from just over 1km, if you know any ship today that comes near that then please speak up?)
 * another point is that the UNSC call the ships based on thier own classifications, yes? so if they refer to them by tonage as it is predicted and stated they do e.g Halcyon class cruiser bieng made the smallest ship designated the Cruiser classification, then from the looks of things the carrier would be a bigger tonage egualing more power based on the predictions used by the way they name the Covenant ships
 * and lastly i know that there are different roles but you have to take in consideration that these do travel through space, and it is stated that the Cruisers carried Longswords, pelicans aswell as the frigates evan carrying these, so if you could name me a Battlecruiser of todays modern age that carrys fighters and mass helicopters and evan better frigates that do, then go ahead but from the information we have been given and from pure general knowledge space vessels are extremely diffrent to vessels of today, there?