Talk:CAA Heavy Burden

CAA, or UNSC?
If it's supposed to be CAA, then why does it say on the hull UNSC? This can easily be very confusing. -- Xamikaze330  [Transmit |Files ] 12:29, 10 June 2013 (EDT)Xamikaze330
 * Probably just a mistake on 343i's part (the 2012 E3 build had it designated as a frigate, so it's likely they just forgot to remove the "UNSC" from the hull). Anyways, I'd rather go with the map description.-- 12:32, 10 June 2013 (EDT)
 * Fair enough. Still, it does kinda irritate me. Sometimes I hate my freaking perfectionist tendencies. -- Xamikaze330  [Transmit |Files ] 12:34, 10 June 2013 (EDT)Xamikaze330
 * In the infobox, it is stated that the era is "Second Human-Covenant War", shouldn't it be "Human-Covenant War"? (The only thing we know about it is that it participated in the Battle of Kholo).


 * The vessel has not changed it's identity. Its name and registry number are the same as when it was a part of the CAA. But, recall that the UNSC took over the authority from the CAA at the beginning of the war. This mining ship was changed to ordnance transportation, but the CAA was now run by the UNSC even as of the Battle of Kholo, so you'd expect the UNSC might slap a UNSC logo on the side of the hull for it's re-purposed missions. Now, why it's a post-war UNSC icon and not the older style...well, if Halo 4 didn't already put that stuff all over the Dawn and its vehicle complement, I'd have said it was a slightly imperfect holographic recreation in the Spartan-IV training facilities on board Infinity where Adrift takes place. This freighter may be a very old design as well, since the Strategy Guide map content also alludes to it being from the UNSC's colonization days. ScaleMaster117 (talk) 16:35, 10 June 2013 (EDT)

Possible New Content Information?
Why was the New Content template removed? I put it there because Stephen Loftus speculated that there may possibly be new information coming soon, what with the Halo 4: Essential Visual Guide coming out in September this year. But it is just speculation. Another thing I'm speculating/wondering is, was or is the ship presumed lost? But still, maybe we should err on the side of caution... -- Xamikaze330  [Transmit |Files ] 12:49, 10 June 2013 (EDT)Xamikaze330