Halopedia talk:Halopedian of the Month/07 2010

According to the Self-Voting Amendment, users may no longer vote for themselves until someone votes for them first.

Votes

 * Lovemuffin: Has been an excellent user ever since he's arrived on Halopedia. He's helped people, Newbies, Regulars, and Veterans alike, more than anyone else has. And always has a terrific attitude towards Halopedia. [[Image:CommanderTony Logo.PNG|25px]] General  Tony ,  Administrator of Halopedia  Talk 6/30/2008
 * "More than anyone else has." - I think Dragonclaws is the exception there.  Ha lo Du de 09:01, 11 July 2008 (UTC)


 * Lovemuffin: He's deserved this for a long time. As per CommanderTony. Pryo 'Zarkum,  [ iTalk ] [ iWork ] [ iWrite]|undefined 13:31, 30 June 2008 (UTC)


 * I'm going to wait a while and see how this plays out before I vote. Pryo 'Zarkum,  [ iTalk ] [ iWork ] [ iWrite]|undefined 11:49, 1 July 2008 (UTC)


 * Sitheris: He is one of the most co-operative users here at Halopedia, and he has done so much in an attempt to improve our communities. He is a friendly, helpful, and knowledgeable user who should be recognized. SSgt. Razgriz  23:34, 30 June 2008 (UTC)


 * EwCDnaudee419: A knowledgable and hardworking user. General   simon   r  j  h 11:15, 1 July 2008 (UTC)


 * EwCDnaudee419: He gets my vote.Bllasae 14:16, 1 July 2008 (UTC)


 * EwCDnaudee419: Hey! Wait! He gets my vote too. Halo and 24 fan 19:07, 1 July 2008 (UTC)


 * EwCDnaudee419: Reverts loads of unwanted edits, and contributes with many good edits of his own. The   Adm  iral  [[Image:1212237429_Rearadmiralinsignia.jpg|25px]] 15:33, 4 July 2008 (UTC)


 * EwCDnaudee419: He makes great contributions to Halopedia!  RaZoRKilleR117 ,  Zurxoz 'Warkum [[Image:1208489766 Elites standard 4.jpg|19px]]


 * Lovemuffin: As per the above Dragonblaze-052 02:07, 6 July 2008 (UTC)


 * Simon rjh: This is an abnormal move on my part (I think this is my second ever HotM vote) but Simon has made, perhaps, the most important contribution to this community this month with his petition and subsequent blog calling for the end of points. I make this only in part because of the specific contribution but because the contribution is a form that has rarely been utilized in Halopedia and should be commended.  --forgottenlord 02:19, 12 July 2008 (UTC)

Comments
Sitheris? Are you kitting me!? He has less than 100 mainspace edits, the other nominees have more than 1,000. Excuse me, but wtf? Pryo 'Zarkum, [ iTalk ] [ iWork ] [ iWrite]|undefined 11:53, 1 July 2008 (UTC)


 * It isn't just about editcount, it's about quality of those edits, communication and enthusiasm. Being an asset to Halopedia doesn't necessarily mean you contribute a lot to the articles. General   simon   r  j  h 11:55, 1 July 2008 (UTC)


 * I understand that. But obviously, you didn't look at some of the differences on his contribs. They are mostly the additions of links, or a spelling fix up. Forgottenlord, for example, doesn't have a huge amount of namespace edits, but has been a great asset to the community, and very enthusiastic and constructive on controversial blog posts. Sitheris lacks significant contributions and the kind of effort and enthusiasm shown by FL. Pryo 'Zarkum,  [ iTalk ] [ iWork ] [ iWrite]|undefined 12:01, 1 July 2008 (UTC)


 * I meant it as a guideline for voting in general, not just for Sitheris, who is a bad example because of the reasons you stated. Forgottenlord is a very good example, again, for the reasons you provided, although he used to contribute to articles a lot as well before his unofficial leaving. General   simon   r  j  h 12:06, 1 July 2008 (UTC)


 * I've never even seen this "Sitheris" guy on Halopedia.Bllasae 14:18, 1 July 2008 (UTC)

We really have a problem here, who's this Sitheris guys, and I think that no users with less than 100 edits are allowed to be nominated. Master Chief Petty Officer Spartan Contribution 14:23, 1 July 2008 (UTC)


 * I found nothing in the policy along the lines of requirements for nominees. Pryo 'Zarkum,  [ iTalk ] [ iWork ] [ iWrite]|undefined 21:09, 1 July 2008 (UTC)

Quit your whining. There are no requirements for being nominated, and if someone thinks the guy deserves it, so be it. You don't have to stand around shrieking "He is not worthy!" 15:32, 2 July 2008 (UTC)


 * Whining? Shrieking? Are you trying to piss people off? Pryo 'Zarkum,  [ iTalk ] [ iWork ] [ iWrite]|undefined 19:44, 2 July 2008 (UTC)

Yes Manticore has a very good point. However this is a little off-track. I thought Sitheris was a sockpuppet of someone or is that TheSodaFreak? It is definitely one of them which is a sockpuppet of Echo-1337-Rogue or whatever his name is. I however do not care if someone thinks this dude should be nominated then go and do just that. Halo and 24 fan 19:19, 2 July 2008 (UTC)


 * Now that's interesting, a sockpuppet?

Ok guys lets just settle down, its not a big deal. Spirit-of-HALO 19:47, 2 July 2008 (UTC)

Having sockpuppets is quite a big deal on halopedia. Master Chief Petty Officer Spartan Contribution 04:02, 6 July 2008 (UTC)


 * Yeah, I think it's pretty unlikly that Sitheris will get supported over the other two candidates, so there's no need to complain. Everyone is entitled to a vote. General   simon   r  j  h 09:57, 3 July 2008 (UTC)

Agreed. Councilor Εw C 'Dnaudee Battle Net<font color="Green"> My Editcount 14:02, 3 July 2008 (UTC)