Halopedia:UNSC of Halopedia/Council/Archive/6th term

Removal (Passed)
Due to the increasing inactivity in the UoH, I am proposing that all members who have not edited since November 20th be removed from the UoH. I have already prepared a list, and all those who may be removed can return to the UoH and be reinstated with their former rank.

Also, I am suggesting that all new UoH members "prove" themselves by working on a major project.

Support
-- Sgt. johnson  17:09, 19 January 2008 (UTC)

-- Excellent idea.  General  simon   r  j  h 17:40, 19 January 2008 (UTC)

-- Good idea. General  Tony ,  Administrator of Halopedia  Talk 1/19/2008

Platoons/Companies (Passed)
After the Companies were disbanded last term, activity in the UoH dropped to a very low level. That is why I propose bringing the companies back. The companies got many, many more articles improved and helped keep the UoH neat and organized. I belive that active Majors should lead the companies. Also, with the ratification of the removal, we now have only 93 Privates. With that, we can organize them into four platoons, and organize those four platoons into two companies. I believe that the XO's for the Companies should be active Majors, with the XOOs and OOs to be Colonels or higher. In that respect, I also believe that active Lieutenants should lead the platoons, with active Gunnery Sergeants for further support.

Support
-- Sgt. johnson  17:09, 19 January 2008 (UTC)

-- As per AJ. General  Tony ,  Administrator of Halopedia  Talk 1/19/2008

-- E D  16:16, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

Neutral
Although I liked the companies and thought they were effective, there were still only about 3 active users per company, so I wonder whether it would be better to combine all our efforts.  General  simon   r  j  h 17:40, 19 January 2008 (UTC)

I'm not to willing to go down the path of the companies again, it was a mess. --Ajax 013 13:10, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

Who should lead? (Concluded)
As per my proposal, active Majors should lead the Companies, which will only be two in number at this time. That is why I am proposing Spartan-781 and Blemo for the company commanders. -- Sgt. johnson  16:22, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

Senior Enlisted Ranks Addition (Passed)
In this new term, I will propose many new things. And first off, I want to add one new rank to the Senior Enlisted rank structure. As well as one new billet position for the best and most experienced enlistedman.

Master Sergeant: In Halo 3, the rank of "Master Sergeant" is the correct term for the Gunnery Sergeant Grade 4. And since the UoH uses the Halo 3 ranks, we should delete the rank of Gunnery Sergeant Grade 4 and add the Master Sergeant rank in it's place.

This will even out the numerous Sergeant ranks in terms of members, and lower the number of Gunnery Sergeants by half it's current number.

Sergeant Major of the UoH: Like in the US Marine Corps, a SgtMaj of the UoH would be the senior enlistedman of the UoH. He or she would be elected to the position, just like any of the Generals.

The member would represent the enlistedman of the UNSC of Halopedia and would serve on the UoH Council, though have limited say in some proposals.

This person would be plucked from the Gunnery Sergeants and Master Sergeants, and has to be a member of the UoH for at least 4 months at the start of the elections.

The Sergeant Major would serve for four months, just as any member of the UoH council. And can either be elected to serve another term or be promoted to Lieutenant Grade 1.

Support
-- As per my nomination. General  Tony ,  Administrator of Halopedia  Talk 1/19/2008

-- Sgt. johnson  23:48, 19 January 2008 (UTC)

Good idea. --  General  simon   r  j  h 23:51, 19 January 2008 (UTC)

- E D  16:16, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

Caboose
-- Sgt. johnson  00:06, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

SPARTAN-077 (Chosen as of 27 January 2008)
General  Tony ,  Administrator of Halopedia  Talk 1/19/2008

-- Sgt. johnson  16:50, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

HaloDude

 * I Don't want to run for this position, so i'm out. Thanks anyway, bye!  Ha lo Du de 00:25, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

Activity
Activity in the UoH is now at an all time low, and I have no idea why. So, for all the Generals and any UoH Member, what do you think needs to be done to spur activity? -- Sgt. <font color="Black">johnson  16:59, 21 January 2008 (UTC)


 * Bungie announcing another Halo game. I know that's not really helpful, but thats what caused the rush of activity a few months ago, not the creation of the companies, in my opinion.  General  simon   r  j  h 17:03, 21 January 2008 (UTC)


 * If more info on Halo: Chronicles and Halo Wars came out, yeah, that may spur activity. I know that in June, activity is going to go waaay up. -- <font color="Black">Sgt. <font color="Black">johnson [[Image:General-gr1.gif|30px]] 17:25, 21 January 2008 (UTC)


 * Yes obviously if any new info is released regarding games, movies, books etc. Activity will skyrocket! Goheels619 00:15, 16 May 2008 (UTC)Goheels619

Lance Corporal and removal of Pvt Grade 2 (Passed)
Yes, another rank proposal by me. This time I want to propose a Junior Enlisted rank instead of a Senior Enlisted rank.

Lance Corporal: A corporal rank, which I hope moves all Private Grade 2's to this rank. Why you ask? Because there are too many Privates, even with the recent member removal project.

What this will do is cut the number of Privates by 20% percent and leave only one Private grade. A rank that really doesn't need grades in the first place.

Since it only effects a small portion of UoH members, I do not think this is serious enough for prolonged talk and will not effect the UoH in any way.

Thank you for reading this and I hope to pass this proposal soon!

Rawr,

General  Tony ,  Administrator of Halopedia  Talk 1/23/2008

Support
-- As per my proposal General  Tony ,  Administrator of Halopedia  Talk  1/23/2008

-- <font color="Black">Sgt. <font color="Black">johnson  01:12, 23 January 2008 (UTC)

--  General  simon   r  j  h 15:42, 23 January 2008 (UTC)

Removal of the Companies
Yeah, I was the biggest person on bringing them back, but now that I see, they've failed. I am now requesting a vote on the Removal of the Companies.

Support
I never wanted them back anyway...  General  simon   r  j  h 20:51, 24 March 2008 (UTC)