Talk:Eridanus system

Eridanus System
There is a page Eridanus system, which is a stub, as well as Eridanus Star System, which redirects to Epsilon Eridani System. Are they the same, or is this a mistake? --Dragonclaws 22:05, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Eridanus and Epsilon Eradini are two different systems. Eridanus system contains Eridanus II, Epsilon Eradini contains Reach. I'd say the redirect was accidental or mistaken. -ED 02:17, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Okay, thanks. --Dragonclaws 02:44, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Just to make it more confusing the real life Epsilon Eridani Star System is IN the Constellation Eridanus -- Esemono 06:23, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
 * That's probably where the confusion arose. --Dragonclaws 20:38, 2 November 2006 (UTC)

Since when was Joshua-029 from Eridanus II? I removed it.  Specops306 ,  Kora 'Morhek  04:47, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

That picture, currently Image:Eridanus system.jpg, is of HD 20606, which isnt even in the Eridanus constellation, and is well outside UNSC space at 202 lightyears. All it has is Eridanus near it, misleading people into believing its a planet in the system. I'm removing it.  Specops306 ,  Kora 'Morhek  20:16, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

On the page about Mamore it says that mamore is in the Eridanus System so I am going to put it there.


 * Actually, that may not be entirely accurate. Halsey's journal mentions a "Eridanus sector", not system. Judging how the UNSC uses "sectors" as a definition for regions of space consisting of multiple systems, it's possible that "Eridanus sector" is actually a larger area consisting of many star systems, including Eridanus and Epsilon Eridani. This would also make sense considering the name "Eridanus" has popped up in strange places before where it apparently referred to a larger area than a single system. --Jugus (Talk  | Contribs ) 08:25, 21 October 2010 (EDT)


 * fair enough