Halopedia:Monitors of Halopedia/Regret (Level)

Halopedia &gt; Monitors of Halopedia &gt; FA Nomination &gt; 


 * Status: FEATURED ARTICLE NOMINATION

Support
- Pretty good-looking with transcript and long walkthrough. --Dragonc laws (talk ) 06:58, 3 November 2007 (UTC)

- Dragonclaws explanation sums up my views. General  Tony  Talk 11/03/2007

- per forgottenlord and above. -- Manticore   Talk 09:22, 6 November 2007 (UTC)

Disapprove
- No. More. Levels! I was going to oppose TGJ and change my vote when Manticore passed it. No more campaign levels! Cheers, RelentlessRecusant  'o the Halopedia Team http://images.wikia.com/rainbowsix/images/7/73/GDI2.jpg TALK • MESSAGE 15:47, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
 * ...Why? Shouldn't anything be able to be an FA as long as it's notable and stuff? Seems like a pretty lame reason to oppose something in my humble opinion. --Dragonc laws (talk ) 18:41, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Maybe I'm prejudiced, but maps just clearly aren't FA quality. They're a 1-paragraph summary, a transcript, and a walkthrough. It's honorable people put in the effort to compile transcripts and walkthroughs, but they simply aren't notable nor interesting nor sufficiently 'complicated'. Cheers, RelentlessRecusant  'o the Halopedia Team http://images.wikia.com/rainbowsix/images/7/73/GDI2.jpg TALK • MESSAGE 21:17, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
 * I'm sorry.....what? Correct me if I'm wrong, but Featured Articles should be held as an example of how to write an article.  Isn't there a very different standard for campaign levels as opposed to Battle write ups as opposed to equipment stats?  So why shouldn't we use this function to demonstrate the many types of articles and how best they should be written? --forgottenlord 02:16, 4 November 2007 (UTC)

More images. - E D  02:25, 19 December 2007 (UTC)

Things to do

 * Add more images. -- E D [[Image:ArmyROTC.gif|15px]] 02:25, 19 December 2007 (UTC)