Talk:Hydrostatic gel

Hydrostatic gel
I read this article and i was wondering, If it makes DIRECT contact with skin,then that means the spartans are naked in the armor?--Mac10&amp;Cheese 03:48, 9 April 2007 (UTC)


 * Probably. The armor would be bulkier with clothing. -- Dragonc laws ( talk ) 05:47, 9 April 2007 (UTC)


 * Of course! Wouldn't you like to kill a bunch of Covenant and Flood and stuff and then just suddenly yell in an obnoxiously high-pitched voice... "because I'm NAKED!!!!!"? I know I would... too bad my uncle's always here... and he spends most of his time in the room with my XBox... O_o G ü é ß Ł ¥ -∏ é Ґ ∫ ø ñ ¥ -† ħ <font color="#00cc00">î <font color="#00ff00">И <font color="#44ff44">g <font color="#99ff99">¥  07:24, 9 April 2007 (UTC)


 * What? Doesn't the armor count as clothing? It's like saying, "Underneath those clothes... nude." -- Dragon<font color="FF0000">c laws ( talk ) 07:27, 9 April 2007 (UTC)

I was just saying becouse it makes direct contact so you must be naked in the armor,i mean it dosent say direct contact with clothes.--Mac10&amp;Cheese 21:38, 12 April 2007 (UTC)

On page 114 of The Fall of Reach Dr. Halsey says "... Against the skin of the operator, there is a moisture-absorbing cloth suit...", so the hydrostatic gel layer is somewhere inside the armor, but it's not the innermost layer. Thats true,but then that conflicts with the page. revise it.