Forum:Articles Needing Fact Cleanup

I have been looking over the Articles Needing Fact Cleanup page and I have to say that I think some people are over-reacting. I am OB (obbsessive compulsive) however, I do know that not all the articles can be perfect. Take the COM page for example(It is COMM by the way, but I cannot change that), How Can you put sources in when it listed what it is right there? Am I supposed to go into definition of what it really is, when it was invented, and EVERY SINGLE THING it is used for? Like the Arc Welder as well, Where are we going to put sources for something SO OBVIOUS. Should I list Reality-based Arc Welders if you unhappy with a lack of sources From the Halo Universe? It would be nice as well if the Admins could list what they want in clearer detail instead of "Sources Need to Be Sited" ALL THE TIME. Also, we need to start looking at pages that have already been cleaned up and remove the Fact or Fiction boxes. We can't pile them up to the point where every page has them. -- WR A IT H  COMM   CONTRIBS  17:26, 25 June 2007 (UTC)


 * Firstly, it is COM, not COMM; FLEETCOM, TACCOM, etc. Secondly, yes, you could change that, if COMM was correct; it's called "move." That's how everyone else changes it; you don't need to be special to be able to move pages. Thirdly, you can put in sources by putting in a == Sources == heading, with all the sources below that. If possible, EVERY time ANYthing is said about something that is also said in the article, that should be a source. Do that, and we're happy. g ü é ß Ł ¥ -π é Ґ ∫ ø ñ <font color="#000000">¥ -<font color="#000000">† <font color="#007700">ħ <font color="#00cc00">î <font color="#00ff00">И <font color="#44ff44">g <font color="#99ff99">¥  18:36, 25 June 2007 (UTC)

I have already been doing that. -- <font color="#D3D3D3">WR <font color="#A9A9A9">A <font color="#808080">IT <font color="#000000">H  COMM   CONTRIBS  19:12, 25 June 2007 (UTC)