Halopedia:Covenant of Halopedia/Article for Improvement

Article for Improvement
Our current Article for Improvement is the Energy Projector article!

The Covenant of Halopedia will vote on articles that they feel need improvement. Much like the "Improvement Drive", but our Improvement Articles have to be Covenant related.

Any member can suggest an article to improve. To suggest an article, simply add it to the "Nominated Articles" section and vote either  ,    or    below that in the "Comtemplations" section.

You can vote for all the articles, or none, there's no limit on your votes. However, you can only vote once per article, no double voting for an article.

Only members can vote.

Nominated Articles

 * Supreme Commander (3)
 * Pious Inquisitor (3)
 * Xytan 'Jar Wattinree (3)
 * The Punished Deeds (12)
 * Assault Cannon (5)
 * Type-2 Antipersonnel Fragmentation Grenade (2)
 * Brute Chieftain (10)
 * Age of Discovery (1)

Supreme Commander
-It has very little information. I will edit it imediately. Dragonblaze-052 21:24, 25 February 2009 (UTC)

I am not quite sure whether or not enough information is at hand to edit this article and extend it without hurting it. I don't know if there is much we can do here. --Councilor Εw C 'Dnaudee  Battle Net My Editcount Administration 21:28, 25 February 2009 (UTC)

A little shaky on this one...like EwCDnaudee, I'm not sure we can write a huge amount without making lots of verbose sentences and repeated content. The 888th Avatar (Talk) 11:45, 28 February 2009 (UTC)

- It needs a complete re-write, and that picture needs to be edited! Down with the speech bubble! — Weapons  Master   Kouger  03:23, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Changed vote. — Weapons  Master   Kouger  03:21, 2 March 2009 (UTC)

I guess it may need more, but I also find myself agreeing with Dnaudee's opinion. Ascy undefined 'Vamal  Ultra Elite   contribs  08:40, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

- Due to my cleaning up of the article, it is no longer in bad condition. — Weapons  Master   Kouger  03:21, 2 March 2009 (UTC)

- As I've just cleaned it up...Cheers. 03:43, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Fix your sig Imp.  High  DEFIN ITION  21:26, 9 March 2009 (UTC)

- Articles like this need to be as detailed as possible; Supreme Commanders have a lot of background stories in the series. Fishsticks64 18:15, 20 April 2009 (UTC)

- Supreme Commanders deserve better information about them and better pictures User:Spartan Arbiter 17:30, 2 May 2009

Pious Inquisitor
As per my nomination for it last time, it's in a terrible state and seriously needs improvement. Immediently . Ascy undefined 'Vamal  Ultra Elite   contribs  08:40, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

- I tidied it up and it looks a lot better... It still needs a tiny but of help, but not enough to warrant being the Article for Improvement. — Weapons  Master   Kouger  00:55, 2 March 2009 (UTC)


 * I meant that it's quite a small article for a Covenant ship, which is why I think it needs more. Hence, the reason I nominated it. But the choicer is on the votes of course. Ascy undefined 'Vamal   Ultra Elite   contribs  15:27, 3 March 2009 (UTC)


 * We can't add more information... we don't have any to add! We would just be hurting the article by adding more unsolicited info. — Kouger masters  15:33, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Surely there must be something to add! For a covie ship, surely there's more? Hmm.... :/ Ascy undefined 'Vamal   Ultra Elite   contribs  15:47, 3 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Just as a note Kougermasters, adding a heading "Summary" does not amount to a clean-up. "Summary" should never be used as the name of a title, because the introduction is supposed to be a summary. The 888th Avatar  (Talk) 13:49, 11 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Well, someone could have told me that before I added a "Summary" heading to over 50 articles! Besides, everyone else, including Wikia and Wikipedia AND Halopedia, seem to think a Summary heading is ok. And plus, Summary headings look nice and neat. AND I don't just add Summary headings. I am offended. lol that's a lot of fragment sentences :P — Kougermasters 05:16, 18 March 2009 (UTC)

- It needs improvement.Odysseas-Spartan 53  16:23, 2 March 2009 (UTC)

- Even though I've gone and cleaned it up a bit, it needs more verification... ImperatorExercitus

- It needs more informationUser:Spartan Arbiter 17:30, 2 May 2009

- We can't find much information on it. It was probably the ship of the deleted level between Cairo Station and Outskirts (Level). But it is a short article. With truth, Jora 'Mantak -Battlenet --Combat History 00:49, 3 May 2009 (UTC)

Xytan 'Jar Wattinree
- I feel like every time I read the book, than our page, like I don't even know what I'm reading. GEARS OF WAR 2

- Just no. — Kougermasters [ Lt. Commander - Weapons Master - Veteran - Rollbacker  ] 21:23, 9 March 2009 (UTC)

I doubt there is anything we can do with it. There's just not enough information. Ascy undefined 'Vamal  Ultra Elite   contribs  12:44, 19 March 2009 (UTC)

While I agree there is not much information, most of the page is solely speculation and should at least be labelled as such.  Vadamee  23:52, 19 March 2009 (UTC)

As with Ascy above, there isn't enough information to know about this high ranking elite, what is there is all of what we know. Grunt minion22

The article shouldn't be expanded, but I think it needs quite an overhaul. The description sounds like fan fiction and the quotes section is filled to the brim with unnecessary things ("You disagree, Ship Master" does not make a noteworthy quote). lil azn man 13:48, 10 April 2009 (UTC)

The Punished Deeds
- Needs to be written in a more important manner. This probably one of the only sources of Covenant knowledge or type of Covenant book we know of. Perhaps we could have the exact extracts from the Halo Wars timeline quoted here? I believe there's three altogether. It'd be good to have a section for each exerpt and analysis on each one, as well as a brief description of how scarce evidence of Covenant writing/books/databases is.  High  DEFIN ITION  21:31, 9 March 2009 (UTC)

- As per HaloDude. — Kougermasters [ Lt. Commander - Weapons Master - Veteran - Rollbacker  ] 23:18, 9 March 2009 (UTC)

- Per HD, this is rare stuff, and we need to get as much of it as we possibly can. Spec Ops  Commander   Spartansniper  4  50  14:51, 10 March 2009 (UTC)

As per HD and kouger, it needs more doing to it. Ascy undefined 'Vamal  Ultra Elite   contribs  14:53, 10 March 2009 (UTC)

- Reasons explained above.--Odysseas-Spartan 53  19:17, 10 March 2009 (UTC)

- Sounds good. The 888th Avatar (Talk) 13:51, 11 March 2009 (UTC)

- I agree with HD and I think we should incorperate some of our known exerts into the article. That Geek 11:42 18 March 2009 (UTC)

- As per HaloDude. --

- I also agree. It needs more info. the only problem of course is where to find it.  Vadamee  23:54, 19 March 2009 (UTC)

- It's a new article, and the information has only recently been released, what else can we add to it? I'm sure when new info is released we'll add it, so I think this article is far from needing improvement. SevenCycles 00:18, 20 March 2009 (UTC)

As per Halo Dude. Maybe ROBOT will release the DLC with new Timeline info? TAK  ( Speak your mind! ) 20:43, 22 March 2009 (UTC)

I beleive that it can be edited into a muchmore perfect state, especially with help from the Halo Wars timeline (Note: I do not have Halo Wars yet, so please bear with me) User:'Nra Vadumee

I don't have Halo Wars but as the banner says on Gruntipedia, "This article is too damned short, Marine! You will help Gruntipedia by making it larger so it will fit the screen, fool!"

- Gruntipedia --I killed Yapyap with a Needler. 00:25, 15 April 2009 (UTC)

Assault Cannon
- The Punished Deeds are indeed important, but as it's new info, we can add to it later. The Assault Cannon, however, has existed for some time, but needs better/clearer sources, possibly less unneeded links, and maybe better explaining. Although there's small descriptions, it doesn't tell distinct differences between the Assault Cannon and the other variations of the weapon, such as the mortar version etc. SevenCycles 19:48, 12 March 2009 (UTC)

- This article makes me sick. — Kougermasters [ Lt. Commander - Weapons Master - Veteran - Rollbacker  ] 23:25, 12 March 2009 (UTC)

Yes, definately needs more. Ascy undefined 'Vamal  Ultra Elite   contribs  23:03, 13 March 2009 (UTC)

I didn't think an article existing for this long could be so bad. Roker1039 21:26, 14 March 2009 (UTC)

- It needs improvement more than any other nominated article right now. <font color="#7BA05B">Odysseas-Spartan<font color="#4B5320"> 53 </tt> 05:51, 16 March 2009 (UTC)

I recently added a bit more and rewrote it in a better way, and even added an image, so for now I'll stay neutral. Ascy undefined 'Vamal  Ultra Elite   contribs  13:31, 16 March 2009 (UTC)

- As per Nicmavr. — Kougermasters [ Lt. Commander - Weapons Master - Veteran - Rollbacker  ] 09:32, 17 March 2009 (UTC)

- This article at least needs a picture of the Hunter's Cannon so people know what the assault cannon looks like. Sir Finnbar 02:53, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
 * It does have a picture of a hunter's assault cannon. Take a look. Ascy undefined 'Vamal   Ultra Elite   contribs  12:42, 19 March 2009 (UTC)

- While I suppose it could be improved, recent edits have made it suitable.  Vadamee  23:57, 19 March 2009 (UTC)

- This article needs more information about the assault cannon. I have added an image of the assault cannon firing a pellet. But this article needs work. An elite &#39;92 01:39, 6 April 2009 (UTC) - I will clean it up and check it. Zealot master, may 18th 09 - Could someone here tell me the main things that need improvement. Zealot master may 18th 09

Type-2 Antipersonnel Fragmentation Grenade
- The Trivia section is more than half of the article. The article needs to be reorganized. An elite &#39;92 23:47, 6 April 2009 (UTC)

- The article doesn't provide an awful lot of information, but do we really need a lot for a single type of grenade? Fishsticks64 18:10, 20 April 2009 (UTC)

Perhaps, as a solution, move some of it's trivia to the main article area? Councillor  Nicmavr  -  Ascy   'Vamal  Light your way with honour! 17:13, 20 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Exactly what I meant. Jora 'Mantak - Battlenet -Brothers- Combat History  03:45, 25 April 2009 (UTC)

I agree with User:An elite '92. User:Lekgolo123

Brute Chieftain
- The article is a mess, it needs general cleanup.--<font color="#7BA05B">Odysseas-Spartan<font color="#4B5320"> 53 </tt> 14:44, 21 April 2009 (UTC)

Agreed, I will attend to it asap. Councillor  Nicmavr  -  Ascy   'Vamal  Light your way with honour! 15:07, 21 April 2009 (UTC)

- Agreed. — Councillor  Kougermasters  15:25, 21 April 2009 (UTC)

- Yeah, the "Counter-tactics" covers pretty mush the entire page, and I've seen some incorrect data, for example, it said the Arbiter killed Tartarus on Installation 00. Nra 'Vadumee

- The article provides enough information, but is definitely way too messy. It needs to be fixed. Fishsticks64

- Lots of bullets, little organization. I have fixed part of it, but it still needs work. Some of the content applies to War Chieftains and the Chieftain of the Jiralhanae. Jora 'Mantak - Battlenet -- Combat History 05:42, 25 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Since I last edited this article, there were 24 revisions that were made and reverted. It didn't seem to get much better--revisions seem to be closer to an edit war than to improvement. With truth, <span style = "color:#2D1925; font-family: georgia, times">Jora 'Mantak -<span style = "color:#5D1A39; font-family: georgia, times">Battlenet -<span style = "color:#B7608A; font-family: georgia, times">Brothers-<span style = "color:#CCCCCC; font-family: georgia, times">Combat History  20:38, 5 May 2009 (UTC)

- Good article, a little messy, could do with a cleanup, possibly a separate page for chieftains in general to show all three main articles with links to them. User:Kawplach

- The Counter-Chieftain section can leave one's eyes sore. lil azn man 21:47, 2 May 2009 (UTC)

-It needs a lot of help.Kasa &#39;Makonee 19:07, 5 May 2009 (UTC)

-What if I put all the counter-tactics into one group called tactics? Zealot master 19th may 2009

Age of Discovery
-It needs help and it's disputed.Kasa &#39;Makonee 19:18, 9 May 2009 (UTC)