User talk:Sangheili Commando 021

Regarding your latest edit
While you are correct in the fact that "its" is a possessive noun, it was not Specops306 that changed it. He reverted some other nonsense that was inserted into the article. Just clearing that up. Smoke My pageMy talkMy Editcount 17:12, 29 March 2009 (UTC)

The Halo Encyclopedia
While I do not own the book, I can tell you right now that from what I have heard, there have been considerable errors. However, I'd like to tell you right now several things. One, it is likely just somebody who screwed up. Two, chances are, though slim, that we've been wrong all along about the origin of Drones and whatnot. Though unlikely, it is possible. Finally, I heard you remark that you appear to be the only person to care about Halopedia. I'd like you to bring this up to CommanderTony, Devout Atheist or Smoke., and then say that to them. - DinoBenn says "Fight to the End,  Never Give In"   00:11, October 28, 2009 (UTC)
 * Er, that isn't what I said. I just stated that it seems that I am one of the few people who is "overzealous" about the story of Halo. Not anything 'bout the Halopedia. And at least most of the mistakes are mistakes, such as Rogue armor showing a picture of Scout. Just so you know.--Sangheili Commando 021: Fluffball Gato 04:38, October 28, 2009 (UTC)

Hello!
Thanks for leaving a message on my Talk Page. Ugh, due to a XBL screwup i lost all my campaign progress. i had the game beat on legendary with all skulls. &#91;&#91;User:PoopskinTheLiar&#124;PoopskinTheLiar, local retrocomputing geek&#93;&#93; 23:19, January 28, 2010 (UTC)
 * Yeah... You have to do that for all those points achievements, right? --Fluffball Gato 23:25, January 28, 2010 (UTC)


 * Yeah, i've got the points but all my armors are gone. &#91;&#91;User:PoopskinTheLiar&#124;PoopskinTheLiar, local retrocomputing geek&#93;&#93; 23:29, January 28, 2010 (UTC)

(P.S: just noticed this, but Guilty spark bears a bit of a resemblance to a boss from another game series i like. Comparison: Guilty Spark and Tetran: Long Lost Brothers?


 * Holy whoa! What game is that?--Fluffball Gato 23:50, January 28, 2010 (UTC)


 * Tetran first appeared in Salamander (Lifeforce in the US/NES versions) in 1988, but has also appeared in the boss rushes of the other games in the Gradius series. The Gradius II arcade boss rush Skip to 1:53 to see the fight with Tetran in Gradius II arcade. &#91;&#91;User:PoopskinTheLiar&#124;PoopskinTheLiar, local retrocomputing geek&#93;&#93; 23:56, January 28, 2010 (UTC)

Regarding Your Crusade on Machinima
If you ever plan to start such crusade which affects all machinima articles in Halopedia, please do so in a form of a Blog.-  5 əb'7 aŋk (7alk ) 00:15, February 16, 2010 (UTC)


 * It wasn't all the machinima articles, just the ones that really didn't have anything to do with Bungie, Microsoft, or the Halo Universe. Machinima such as "This Spartan Life" deserve to stay, while "Spriggs" does not (in my opinion, of course).--Fluffball Gato 00:18, February 16, 2010 (UTC)


 * Why "This Spartan Life", a machinima which has been put on hold ever since Halo 3 came out?-  5 əb'7 aŋk (7alk ) 00:24, February 16, 2010 (UTC)


 * Well, because Bungie employees have been featured in it. That means it is supported by them, which I believe to be the only reason to have a machinima on the Halopedia.--Fluffball Gato 02:41, February 16, 2010 (UTC)

Reply to your statement...
I get what you mean by your statement. If it makes you feel better, I'll at least stop putting the delete boxes. But I would still create the pages. That way, it will be more fair. Also, once the pages are deleted, the number of edits * 50 are deducted from your point total. --  General5 7    talk    contribs    email   00:09, February 25, 2010 (UTC)

You have a chance to win
Keep up the great editing and you could become the HOTM of the month of May! Just take a look at the Halopedian of the Month page. Hope you win! (_)LTR/-\ FRCE 03:21, April 2, 2010 (UTC)
 * Wow, that's great! I hope I win! --Fluffball Gato 06:10, April 2, 2010 (UTC)
 * I lost... @#$%!!--Fluffball Gato 22:28, May 12, 2010 (UTC)
 * You will get a chance some day. -->Captain Grade One.png  My Page  Talk Page   Contributions Page   All Edits Page   Email Page  ( Wiki Page ) ( Favourite Page ) ( Opinion Page ) 12:23, May 23, 2010 (UTC)

Re: Edit warring
There were various sources stating the endangerment of the Skirmisher race, and all you could do was delete the section stating so every time somebody re-added it. Your various summaries went as far as to be considered violent, and somewhat irrational. If it meant so much to you, why couldn't you just place a proposal on the talk page? Edit warring is condemned at the Halopedia, and you're opinion was vastly unpopular. Please don't keep doing that! Contact me if you want any clarification.--Fluffball Gato 06:24, June 6, 2010 (UTC)

Mmmmm.... Mmmm hmmm. Yeah, "violent".
 * 1) Nothing I stated was violent. Here are my edit summaries: 1. Give me a source on how it is canon. 2. How would you know they were not featured anywhere else because of being rare? They weren't THOUGHT OF until Halo: Reach was being made. And: Because they were thought of specifically for Reach. They weren't made in other games because of being rare, they weren't there because they weren't thought of. Nothing in those two summaries were what you considered "violent".
 * 2) Vastly unpopular? The only people that seemed to dislike my "opinion" (which was merely me removing information that wasn't true) was you and JEA13.
 * 3) I didn't see any sources stating that Skirmishers weren't put in other games because of being rare. As I have said several times, they weren't thought of until Halo: Reach was in production.
 * 4) I chose the 3 revert rule. If one of you was to put it back, I would have talked about it on the talk page.

I ask for you to reply back about this if you have something else.--Shade  12:48, June 6, 2010 (UTC)

Forgot to add something: The other admins that protected the page agreed that it wasn't needed. Notice they chose not to add it back. That means they also believe the information is fake/unneeded.--Shade  12:49, June 6, 2010 (UTC)


 * The above is untrue. I protected the article and chose to just leave the info as it is, while also improve some of the contents (grammar, layout, etc). -  <font color="#FF4F00">5 əb<font color="#FF4F00">'7 aŋk (<font color="#FF4F00">7alk ) 14:37, June 6, 2010 (UTC)

Also, as much as you claimed my summaries (see above) were violent, they weren't. In fact, I saw some rudeness in your summaries, rather than mine. Oh, and why exactly is a normal, un-righted user telling me what I am doing "wrong", yet I deleted the false information with good intention?--<span style="background:Black;display:inline-block;height:16px;padding-right:4px;line-height:1em;position:relative;top:-3px;-moz-border-radius:0 50% 50%"><font color="Blue">Shade  13:06, June 6, 2010 (UTC)


 * I meant borderline violent, you don't have to get so angry about it. =( The only person who thought it was worthy of deletion was you, and your opinion is no greater than anybody else's. I believe you are kind of stepping out of your boundaries for deleting something just because it was your opinion. I didn't mean to sound so accusatory, or make you so upset, but please propose a content deletion if it means so much to you. Constant deletion is not the answer, and everybody should follow this rule. --Fluffball Gato 16:39, June 6, 2010 (UTC)


 * Oh, I forgot to add this. Remember how you said how their were no sources to that information? Well, we got it from the Xbox website, where they have said a couple things stating their extinction or near extinction by the Battle of Reach. Here is one that I found, "It could also introduce such new enemies as Skirmishers and fit them into Halo's lore with the explanation that the vast extent of the battle and destruction of the planet caused their extinction." I don't know if that's proof enough for you, so you can search Xbox.com for more. I was just saying that there are sources, so your deletions are unfounded. --Fluffball Gato 16:50, June 6, 2010 (UTC)

Once again Fluffball Gato, I wasn't the only one who thought it was worthy of deletion. Also, I wasn't giving an opinion; it's a fact that it is unneeded. I wasn't "stepping out of my borderlines because it was my opinion"; as I have said, Skirmishers weren't created until Halo: Reach was in production. I have another question: Why exactly does my "opinion" (which is not an opinion) not matter, yet yours does? I am not upset, I am just curious why only your opinion seems to matter. And it wasn't "constant deletion", it was good intention; For the... *counts* 4th or 5th time, Skirmishers weren't absent in other games because of being rare; they just weren't created. I'm not against you or anything, just to let you know.--<span style="background:Black;display:inline-block;height:16px;padding-right:4px;line-height:1em;position:relative;top:-3px;-moz-border-radius:0 50% 50%"><font color="Blue">Shade  16:54, June 6, 2010 (UTC)


 * I don't think you can understand: we know the Skirmishers weren't in any previous games because they were not thought of. That does not make that trivia entry any less important, as canonically they were nearly wiped out. Did you skip the source I provided? And your opinion does not matter less than mine. I was saying that two opinions (which were the ones that weren't really opinions... look at the source!) are better than one. You appear to be the only one to believe that way. The page was not locked because you were "right", it was locked because you wouldn't stop your campaign until it had finished. Just looking at your contributions, I see a pattern. A deletion, a revert, a deletion, another deletion... please consider adding to the wiki, not destroying it. I don't understand why it appears to be so important to delete that factual information. Sorry, but I am getting really shocked at your reaction, seemingly focused on the smaller things I have said, yet not the bigger picture.--Fluffball Gato 17:02, June 6, 2010 (UTC)


 * Halopedia uses the "two-revert rule" (2RR) as opposed to Wikipedia's 3RR. You're closer to an edit war block than you think.--  Fore  run  ner  17:47, June 6, 2010 (UTC)

I didn't say it was locked because I was right. I am done arguing anyways, seeing neither of us can exactly listen to each other, Sangheili Commando.--<span style="background:Black;display:inline-block;height:16px;padding-right:4px;line-height:1em;position:relative;top:-3px;-moz-border-radius:0 50% 50%"><font color="Blue">Shade  17:50, June 6, 2010 (UTC)

Second, I am not "destroying" the wiki. A single user couldn't do that. Don't try to make me look like some blood-sucking villain--<span style="background:Black;display:inline-block;height:16px;padding-right:4px;line-height:1em;position:relative;top:-3px;-moz-border-radius:0 50% 50%"><font color="Blue">Shade  17:55, June 6, 2010 (UTC)


 * Look both of you are wrong for edit-warring and both of you have things wrong such as: Shade Link not destroying this Wiki, and Fluffball Gato was sort of right about the canon thing but just leav most of it alone because new releases cause speculation and leads to edit-wars so it should just be like it should normally until further information is released.

Agreed.--<span style="background:Black;display:inline-block;height:16px;padding-right:4px;line-height:1em;position:relative;top:-3px;-moz-border-radius:0 50% 50%"><font color="Blue">Shade  18:13, June 6, 2010 (UTC)

I wasn't attempting to edit war, which is why I initially contacted you. You said that you wanted evidence, so I gave it to you. I don't understand you're argument, sorry! Anyway, I'll be find to end it right here.--Fluffball Gato 18:33, June 6, 2010 (UTC)

Hello!
Hi there! What is your favorite Halo game? <font style="background:black"> Munchable901   |TALK?  03:41, July 4, 2010 (UTC)
 * Hmm, I suppose it would be Halo 3, as it is the culmination of all of Bungie Halo's so far. Halo: Reach will probably be my favorite when it comes out.--Fluffball Gato 06:29, July 4, 2010 (UTC)

Gallery Section
The proper use of the Slideshow feature is only for 14+ galleries. Anything below that must be in his code:. -- Ultra Force  18:01, July 15, 2010 (UTC)

I need a second opinion.
Can you (or someone else) confirm that there isn't any chin-gun on the Falcon in the RVB Deja View trailer. I posted this on the Falcon's talk page but no one responded =-(. I'd appreciate it if you'd respond there. Que   Sera,  Sera  02:34, July 26, 2010 (UTC)

Slideshows?
So um, I left the wikia for a bit and now have come back. When I left it was normal galleries, then it was these slideshow things and now your changing them to these portrait galleries. Is this what's happening with galleries now or what? If so do you want me to help change 'em? <font color="Blue"> Helljumper U T C
 * We make slideshows for galleries with more than fourteen images, but at first we were only using slideshows for everything. Now, we are replacing the slideshows with less than fourteen images with portraits. You make portraits by adding,  <gallery widths="120" orientation="portrait"> ii to the top of the gallery sections. I would love it if you would help me! =) -- <span style="background-color:purple; color:gold; -moz-border-radius-topleft:10px; -moz-border-radius-bottomleft:10px">Sangheili Commando 021: Fluffball Gato   22:42, July 15, 2010 (UTC)