User:Pathfinder11

Pathfinder11

1,800 points

(Private)

Contributions

Awards

1 of 1

Statistics

Edits 14

Personal Information

Real nameDan

Recent activity

advanced to level Private

advanced to level Private

Sent a message to VadersFist666

"Trying to but I still have not quiet figured out how to do it yet."

Sent a message to Smoke.

"I will have them check it again when we go to the range this month and h..."

Sent a message to VadersFist666

"I wasn't randomly adding and the conjecture delete was by mistake. My so..."

Sent a message to Smoke.

"Anyway thanks for the help on this i have tried mailing a few other admi..."

Sent a message to Smoke.

"My source for the BR55 was the original Halo 2 User guide that had the n..."

Sent a message to Smoke.

"I do understand why you changed. My question I guess is where are these ..."

Board

7 of 7

You must be logged in to post messages to other users

VadersFist666

creating a page?

Send VadersFist666 a message Board-to-board

VadersFist666

Well then I'm sorry...maybe make the pathfinder, and 390 pages first then add it, so it doesn't seem random lol.

)

Send VadersFist666 a message Board-to-board

Smoke.

Also, the reason I asked for a source is because even though that information is technically wrong, Bungie/343 Industries has screwed up before and it might actually be canonically correct.

Send Smoke. a message Board-to-board

Smoke.

I didn't say you didn't have anything useful to add, just that that particular information you added was incorrect. I have no idea what you tried to add to the UNSC Army article, and to be honest I probably don't know enough to verify or refute any information you did add to that article.

However, I work on and shoot firearms (in particular, AR rifles) as a hobby. I tend to go over those articles and make sure that they are correct from a technical perspective. That is why you ran into me when editing the BR55 articles.

Send Smoke. a message Board-to-board

Smoke.

Your information is not solid. I told you why.

Send Smoke. a message Board-to-board

Smoke.

First of all, fix your tone. No one is getting "bent out of shape" except for you right now. Go see the talk page and read why I reverted your edits.

Seeing as 7.62 NATO is quite a bit longer than the 9.5x40mm, it will take more than a simple bolt and barrel switch to interchange rounds; the receiver would need to be lengthened because the magazine well isn't long enough to feed 7.62 NATO rounds.

Send Smoke. a message Board-to-board

VadersFist666

You had no sources and it seemed like you were just randomly added things. Plus you deleted the conjecture markers and those need to be there.

Send VadersFist666 a message Board-to-board